Shape-based clustering for demand response potential evaluation: A perspective of comprehensive evaluation metrics

被引:2
|
作者
Li, Zhaoyu [1 ]
Zhang, Yufan [1 ]
Ai, Qian [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Key Lab Control Power Transmiss & Convers, Minist Educ, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
来源
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY GRIDS & NETWORKS | 2023年 / 36卷
基金
国家重点研发计划;
关键词
Demand response; Load profiling; k -Shape clustering; Markov chain; Adaptive piecewise aggregate approximation; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.segan.2023.101213
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
With the wide deployment of smart meter and advanced communication technology, customers in demand side have large potential to participate in demand response (DR). Therefore, suitable DR potential evaluation methods are needed to select customers for proper DR programs. In this work, an evaluation procedure based on multiple metrics is proposed. First, a bi-level clustering method is proposed to group load profiles into clusters based on the similarity in shape. Adaptive k-Shape clustering is proposed to automatically generate clusters based on the defined threshold. To evaluate the variability of the load profiles in each cluster, adaptive piecewise aggregate approximation (APAA) method is proposed to divide time series into segments based on load features. Then, onestep Markov chain is utilized to model the dynamics of load profiles. And the multiple evaluation metrics is calculated which can reflect variability, sensitivity, and quantity of electricity consumption to generate potential evaluation criterion. A numerical case study based on Low Carbon London dataset is conducted. The results show that the proposed method is feasible in terms of cluster division, metric calculation, and customer selection.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of shape descriptors for shape-based image retrieval
    Amanatiadis, A.
    Kaburlasos, V. G.
    Gasteratos, A.
    Papadakis, S. E.
    IET IMAGE PROCESSING, 2011, 5 (05) : 493 - 499
  • [2] Shape-based Trajectory Clustering
    Pires, Telmo J. P.
    Figueiredo, Mario A. T.
    ICPRAM: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PATTERN RECOGNITION APPLICATIONS AND METHODS, 2017, : 71 - 81
  • [3] Shape-based features selection for microcalcification evaluation
    Marti, J
    Cufi, X
    Regincos, J
    Espanol, J
    Pont, J
    Barcelo, C
    MEDICAL IMAGING 1998: IMAGE PROCESSING, PTS 1 AND 2, 1998, 3338 : 1215 - 1224
  • [4] SPARCL: Efficient and Effective Shape-based Clustering
    Chaoji, Vineet
    Al Hasan, Mohammad
    Salem, Saeed
    Zaki, Mohammed J.
    ICDM 2008: EIGHTH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DATA MINING, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, : 93 - 102
  • [5] Shape-Based Clustering in Wireless Sensor Networks
    Okeke, Ijeoma
    Verdicchio, Fabio
    2017 IEEE SENSORS, 2017, : 367 - 369
  • [6] Shape-Based Quality Metrics for Large Graph Visualization
    Eades, Peter
    Hong, Seok-Hee
    Klein, Karsten
    Nguyen, An
    GRAPH DRAWING AND NETWORK VISUALIZATION, GD 2015, 2015, 9411 : 502 - 514
  • [7] Shape-Based Alignment of Hippocampal Subfields: Evaluation in Postmortem MRI
    Yushkevich, Paul A.
    Avants, Brian B.
    Pluta, John
    Minkoff, David
    Detre, John A.
    Grossman, Murray
    Gee, James C.
    MEDICAL IMAGE COMPUTING AND COMPUTER-ASSISTED INTERVENTION - MICCAI 2008, PT I, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, 5241 : 510 - +
  • [8] A Comprehensive Evaluation Method and Incentive Mechanism for Demand Response
    Meng, Jinling
    Huang, Xin
    Feng, Yunhe
    Xu, Bing
    Zhao, Wei
    Luo, Min
    2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON POWER SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY (POWERCON), 2018, : 703 - 707
  • [9] A new shape-based clustering algorithm for time series
    Li, Yucheng
    Shen, Derong
    Nie, Tiezheng
    Kou, Yue
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2022, 609 : 411 - 428
  • [10] A shape-based quality evaluation and reconstruction method for electrical impedance tomography
    Antink, Christoph Hoog
    Pikkemaat, Robert
    Malmivuo, Jaakko
    Leonhardt, Steffen
    PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2015, 36 (06) : 1161 - 1177