Techno-economic analysis of lithium-ion battery price reduction considering carbon footprint based on life cycle assessment

被引:21
作者
Chen, Wei-Hsuan [1 ]
Hsieh, I-Yun Lisa [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ, Dept Chem Engn, Taipei 10617, Taiwan
[2] Natl Taiwan Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Taipei 10617, Taiwan
关键词
Lithium-ion battery; Techno-economic analysis; Learning curve model; Life cycle assessment; Carbon footprint; Carbon price; ENERGY-STORAGE; PERFORMANCE; SYSTEMS; COSTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139045
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) play a crucial role in driving energy transitions, particularly in electric vehicles (EVs) and energy storage systems. Forecasting LIB prices has received significant attention due to the tightening of raw material markets. Additionally, the implementation of carbon pricing policies has highlighted the need to incorporate the carbon footprint of LIBs in price evaluation. This study presents a comprehensive analysis of the carbon footprint, pricing trajectories, and forthcoming carbon pricing ramifications associated with LIBs. Firstly, the findings derived from the life-cycle carbon footprint assessment indicate that the global production volumeweighted average carbon footprint of EV battery packs spans 49.2-81.1 kgCO2eq/kWh, depending on the chosen end-of-life treatment. Strategic end-of-life selections, aligned with battery chemical composition, can diminish the carbon footprint by up to 46% relative to improper disposal methods. Notably, direct cathode recycling of NCA and NMC622 batteries exhibits superior environmental performance. Secondly, techno-economic analysis predicts that the mean price of EV battery packs with diverse chemical compositions will decline to $75.1/kWh by 2030, factoring in the compound annual growth rate of critical raw material prices over the past decade. LFP batteries emerge as the top economic performers. Lastly, the results reveal that monetizing a battery's carbon footprint may offset battery price reductions through learning effects. This underscores the imperative of effective recycling for curtailing the carbon footprint and ensuring the enduring economic and environmental competitiveness of LIBs.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 68 条
  • [1] Abbasi S., 2014, Graduate Theses and Dissertations.
  • [2] A cascaded life cycle: reuse of electric vehicle lithium-ion battery packs in energy storage systems
    Ahmadi, Leila
    Young, Steven B.
    Fowler, Michael
    Fraser, Roydon A.
    Achachlouei, Mohammad Ahmadi
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2017, 22 (01) : 111 - 124
  • [3] Effects of battery chemistry and performance on the life cycle greenhouse gas intensity of electric mobility
    Ambrose, Hanjiro
    Kendall, Alissa
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 47 : 182 - 194
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2022, Trading Economics
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2022, Consumer price index
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2006, ISO 14040 2006 ENV M
  • [7] Arias P., 2021, KEY TOP SEMANT PRAGM
  • [8] CO2 Footprint and Life-Cycle Costs of Electrochemical Energy Storage for Stationary Grid Applications
    Baumann, M.
    Peters, J. F.
    Weil, M.
    Grunwald, A.
    [J]. ENERGY TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 5 (07) : 1071 - 1083
  • [9] Black S., 2022, IMF Blog
  • [10] BloombergNEF, 2022, LITHIUM ION BATTERY