Social Media Users' Concerns Regarding Algorithmic News Personalisation

被引:0
作者
Slavnic, Danka Ninkovic [1 ]
Milivojevic, Snjezana [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Beogradu, Fak Politickih Nauka, Belgrade, Serbia
关键词
algorithmic news personalisation; social media; echo-chamber; media users; news audience; AUDIENCE FRAGMENTATION; ECHO CHAMBERS;
D O I
10.2298/SOC2303435N
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
The paper asks if social media users are concerned regarding algorithmic news personalisation and how their concerns connect with other factors. We took the influential concepts of echo chambers and filter bubbles as a starting point to explore three dimensions of concern about news personalisation: missing important information, missing opposite opinions and jeopardising privacy because of personalised news. The survey among social media news users (N=1481) shows that concern exists, but more than a third of users do not have an evident attitude regarding news personalisation. Additionally, the concern is connected with knowledge about the algorithmic selection process, the importance of social networks in users' media repertoire and, to a small extent, negative attitude towards the selection principle. The findings contribute to our understanding of users' perspectives on news personalisation which is particulary relevant considering the increasing use of personalised news and the fact that it is individual citizens' responsibility to be accurately and comprehensively informed in a media environment where the news content is fragmented.
引用
收藏
页码:435 / 457
页数:23
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] "News comes across when I'm in a moment of leisure": Understanding the practices of incidental news consumption on social media
    Boczkowski, Pablo J.
    Mitchelstein, Eugenia
    Matassi, Mora
    [J]. NEW MEDIA & SOCIETY, 2018, 20 (10) : 3523 - 3539
  • [2] INTERESTED IN DIVERSITY The role of user attitudes, algorithmic feedback loops, and policy in news personalization
    Bodo, Balazs
    Helberger, Natali
    Eskens, Sarah
    Moller, Judith
    [J]. DIGITAL JOURNALISM, 2019, 7 (02) : 206 - 229
  • [3] Should we worry about filter bubbles?
    Borgesius, Frederik J. Zuiderveen
    Trilling, Damian
    Moller, Judith
    Bodo, Balazs
    de Vreese, Claes H.
    Helberger, Natali
    [J]. INTERNET POLICY REVIEW, 2016, 5 (01):
  • [4] Bruns A., 2019, Submission No. 19771. Mediated communication, public opinion and society section
  • [5] Filter bubble
    Bruns, Axel
    [J]. INTERNET POLICY REVIEW, 2019, 8 (04):
  • [6] A New Algorithmic Identity Soft Biopolitics and the Modulation of Control
    Cheney-Lippold, John
    [J]. THEORY CULTURE & SOCIETY, 2011, 28 (06) : 164 - 181
  • [7] Cotter K, 2020, INT J COMMUN-US, V14, P745
  • [8] The echo chamber is overstated: the moderating effect of political interest and diverse media
    Dubois, Elizabeth
    Blank, Grant
    [J]. INFORMATION COMMUNICATION & SOCIETY, 2018, 21 (05) : 729 - 745
  • [9] Eskens S., 2017, J MEDIA LAW, V9, P259, DOI [10.1080/17577632.2017.1387353, DOI 10.1080/17577632.2017.1387353]
  • [10] Filter Bubbles, Echo Chambers, and Online News Consumption
    Flaxman, Seth
    Goel, Sharad
    Rao, Justin M.
    [J]. PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2016, 80 : 298 - 320