Prenatal ultrasound for the diagnosis of the agenesis of corpus callosum: a meta-analysis

被引:4
作者
Zhang, Yan [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ, Nanjing Drum Tower Hosp, Affiliated Hosp Med Sch, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Nanjing, Peoples R China
关键词
Prenatal ultrasound; agenesis; corpus callosum; diagnosis; meta-analysis; UPDATED SONOGRAPHIC EXAMINATION; NERVOUS-SYSTEM ANOMALIES; FETAL MRI; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; NEUROSONOGRAPHY; PERFORMANCE; FETUSES; ABNORMALITIES;
D O I
10.1080/14767058.2023.2228454
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background Prenatal ultrasound has been regularly used as the screening tool for agenesis of corpus callosum (ACC) of the fetuses, which were mainly suspected on the basis of indirect signs rather than the visualization of the CC. However, the diagnostic accuracy of prenatal ultrasound for ACC, compared to the gold standard of postmortem diagnosis or postnatal images, is still unknown. This meta-analysis was performed to comprehensively evaluate the efficacy of prenatal ultrasound for the diagnosis of ACC. Methods Studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of prenatal ultrasound for ACC compared to postmortem diagnosis or postnatal images were retrieved by searching PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated with a random-effects model. The diagnostic accuracy was measured by summarized area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curve. Results Twelve studies involving 544 fetuses with suspected anomalies of central nervous system were included, and 143 of them were with validated diagnosis of ACC. Pooled results showed that prenatal ultrasound has satisfying diagnostic efficacy for ACC, with the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios of 0.72 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.39-0.91), 0.98 (95% CI: 0.79-1.00), 43.73 (95% CI: 3.42-558.74, and 0.29 (95% CI: 0.11-0.74), respectively. The pooled AUC was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.92-0.96), suggesting good diagnostic performance of prenatal ultrasound. Subgroup analysis according to the prenatal ultrasound procedures showed a better diagnostic efficacy of neurosonography than that of regular ultrasound screening (sensitivity: 0.84 versus 0.57, specificity: 0.98 versus 0.89, and AUC: 0.97 versus 0.78). Conclusions Prenatal ultrasound, particularly for the neurosonography, confers satisfying efficacy for the diagnosis of ACC.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 44 条
[41]   Verification of anomalies of the central nervous system detected by prenatal ultrasound [J].
Wald, M ;
Lawrenz, K ;
Deutinger, J ;
Weninger, M .
ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN, 2004, 25 (03) :214-217
[42]   Fetal central nervous system anomalies: Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography for diagnosis [J].
Wang Guang-bin ;
Shan Rui-qin ;
Ma Yu-xiang ;
Shi Hao ;
Chen Li-guang ;
Liu Wen ;
Qiu Xiu-ling ;
Wei Yu-long ;
Guo Li ;
Qu Lei ;
Li Hui-hua .
CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 119 (15) :1272-1277
[43]   Usefulness of additional fetal magnetic resonance imaging in the prenatal diagnosis of congenital abnormalities [J].
We, Ji Sun ;
Young, Lee ;
Park, In Yang ;
Shin, Jong Chul ;
Im, Soo Ah .
ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2012, 286 (06) :1443-1452
[44]   QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies [J].
Whiting, Penny F. ;
Rutjes, Anne W. S. ;
Westwood, Marie E. ;
Mallett, Susan ;
Deeks, Jonathan J. ;
Reitsma, Johannes B. ;
Leeflang, Mariska M. G. ;
Sterne, Jonathan A. C. ;
Bossuyt, Patrick M. M. .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2011, 155 (08) :529-U104