Fire-smart solutions for sustainable wildfire risk prevention: Bottom-up initiatives meet top-down policies under EU green deal

被引:40
作者
Ascoli, Davide [1 ]
Plana, Eduard [2 ]
Oggioni, Silvio Daniele [3 ]
Tomao, Antonio [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Colonico, Mario [4 ]
Corona, Piermaria [4 ,5 ]
Giannino, Francesco [7 ]
Moreno, Mauro [7 ]
Xanthopoulos, Gavriil [8 ]
Kaoukis, Konstantinos [8 ]
Athanasiou, Miltiadis [8 ]
Colaco, Maria Conceicao
Rego, Francisco [9 ]
Sequeira, Ana Catarina [9 ]
Acacio, Vanda
Serra, Marta [2 ]
Barbati, Anna [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Torino, Dept Agr Forest & Food Sci, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, I-10095 Grugliasco, Italy
[2] Forest Sci & Technol Ctr Catalonia, Crta St Llorenc Morunys km 2, Lleida 25280, Spain
[3] Univ Milan, Dept Agr & Environm Sci, Via Giovanni Celoria 2, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[4] Univ Tuscia, Dept Innovat Biol Agrofood & Forestry Syst, Via San Camillo Lellis, I-01100 Viterbo, Italy
[5] CREA Res Ctr Forestry & Wood, Viale St Margher 80, I-52100 Arezzo, Italy
[6] Univ Udine, Dept Agr Food Environm & Anim Sci, Via Sci 206, I-33100 Udine, Italy
[7] Univ Naples Federico II, Dept Agr, Via Univ 100, I-80055 Portici, Napoli, Italy
[8] Hellen Agr Org Dimitra, Inst Mediterranean Forest Ecosyst, Athens 11528, Greece
[9] Univ Lisbon, Ctr Appl Ecol Prof Baeta Neves CEABN InBIO, Sch Agr, P-1349017 Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
Wildfire risk prevention; Fire resistant and resilient landscapes; Fire smart; Fuel management; EU Green deal; Bioeconomy; MANAGEMENT; BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103715
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Fuel management for wildfire risk prevention generally lacks economic sustainability. In marginal areas of southern Europe, this limits fuel treatment programs from reaching the critical mass of required treated area to modify landscape flammability, the fire regime and its impacts. This study investigates key fuel management initiatives for wildfire risk prevention in southern EU countries. We compared local approaches through a bottom-up selection of 38 initiatives, which we analyzed systematically through a set of fire-smart criteria: sustainability, cost-benefit ratio, synergies and inter-sectoral cooperation, integration between strategic prevention planning and multiple land governance goals (e.g., rural development, biodiversity conservation, energy supply), innovation and knowledge transfer, and adaptive management. We summarized lessons learned from the most innovative initiatives, by identifying solutions and functional approaches for building sustainable fuel management at the landscape scale, under fire-smart management principles. These make synergistic use of private, public and European resources to activate value chains that valorize the products, by-products and services generated by fuel management activities and their positive externalities on ecosystem services. The multiple mechanisms include fire-marketing, Payment for Ecosystem Services schemes, specific taxes, or environmental compensatory measures. These mechanisms catalyze the interest of multiple stakeholders (economic actors, private owners, land and fire management agencies) improving the cost-efficiency of landscape fuel management. We contend that the EU Green Deal offers the political backing and framework (mainstreaming of EU strategies and funding opportunities) to enable the replication of documented fire-smart models and functional approaches to wildfire risk prevention.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2021, COM202182FINAL EUR C
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2020, EUR-Lex, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.APENERGY.2020.115846
[3]  
[Anonymous], Annals of Silvicultural Research, V39, P1, DOI [DOI 10.12899/ASR-946, 10.12899/ASR-946]
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2020, FARM FORK STRATEGY F
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2021, COM2021572FINAL EUR
[6]   The Potential of Agricultural Conversion to Shape Forest Fire Regimes in Mediterranean Landscapes [J].
Aquilue, Nuria ;
Fortin, Marie-Josee ;
Messier, Christian ;
Brotons, Lluis .
ECOSYSTEMS, 2020, 23 (01) :34-51
[7]   Tree encroachment dynamics in heathlands of north-west Italy: the fire regime hypothesis [J].
Ascoli, D. ;
Bovio, G. .
IFOREST-BIOGEOSCIENCES AND FORESTRY, 2010, 3 :137-143
[8]  
Ascoli D., 2017, SHERWOOD, V230, P28
[9]  
Ascoli D., 2018, ENCY WILDFIRES WILDL, P1, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-51727-8_70-1
[10]  
Ascoli Davide, 2021, Annals of Silvicultural Research, V46, P177, DOI 10.12899/asr-2264