Root Growth and Defense Response of Seedlings against Fusarium oxysporum in Sand Culture and In Vitro-A Comparison of Two Screening Approaches for Asparagus Cultivars

被引:2
作者
Farahani-Kofoet, Roxana Djalali [1 ]
Graefe, Jan [1 ]
Zrenner, Rita [1 ]
机构
[1] Leibniz Inst Vegetable & Ornamental Crops IGZ eV, D-14979 Grossbeeren, Germany
关键词
Asparagus officinalis; Fusarium oxysporum f; sp; asparagi; gene expression; root morphology; test tubes; PLANT DEFENSE; PATHOGENICITY; RESISTANCE; INFECTION;
D O I
10.3390/horticulturae9060656
中图分类号
S6 [园艺];
学科分类号
0902 ;
摘要
Two rapid asparagus (Asparagus officinalis L.) screening methods, in sand culture and in vitro, were tested to evaluate the response of young seedlings against F. oxysporum f. sp. asparagi (isolate Foa1). Root morphological parameters were evaluated and correlated with the symptomatology and expression of the defense-related genes at 5 and 7 dpi. In sand cultivation, the Foa1-inoculated cultivars showed no visible disease symptoms on their roots until 7 dpi. Two-factorial ANOVA statistics found no significant interaction between the cultivars and treatments for most root parameters but some differences between the cultivars. The in vitro Foa1-inoculated cultivars showed high susceptibility according to their symptomatology and differed greatly in the length of the primary root at 5 dpi. In some cultivars, the primary root length and root surface area were higher upon Foa1 inoculation. The expression changes were very different among the cultivars, with significant induction of PR1, POX, and PAL at 5 dpi in all cultivars in vitro but only in two cultivars in sand cultivation. The in vitro screening method, although more artificial, seemed to be more reliable than sand cultivation since the fungus was able to develop well in the culture medium. In sand-filled pots, the fungus may have been hindered in its development, even though a considerable higher amount of Foa1 was inoculated. In addition, the fungal growth was easily trackable in tubes, while in sand cultivation, the results were only visible after pulling the seedlings out of the pots 12 dpi.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Class III peroxidases in plant defence reactions [J].
Almagro, L. ;
Ros, L. V. Gomez ;
Belchi-Navarro, S. ;
Bru, R. ;
Barcelo, A. Ros ;
Pedreno, M. A. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2009, 60 (02) :377-390
[2]   Aggressiveness of Fusarium Species and Impact of Root Infection on Growth and Yield of Soybeans [J].
Arias, Maria M. Diaz ;
Leandro, Leonor F. ;
Munkvold, Gary P. .
PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2013, 103 (08) :822-832
[3]   Etiology of asparagus replant-bound early decline [J].
Blok, WJ ;
Bollen, GJ .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PATHOLOGY, 1996, 102 (01) :87-98
[4]   Effects of Verticillium dahliae on tomato root morphology considering plant growth response and defence [J].
Buhtz, A. ;
Hohe, A. ;
Schwarz, D. ;
Grosch, R. .
PLANT PATHOLOGY, 2017, 66 (04) :667-676
[5]  
DAVIS D, 1963, PHYTOPATHOLOGY, V53, P133
[6]   The phenylpropanoid pathway and plant defence - a genomics perspective [J].
Dixon, RA ;
Achnine, L ;
Kota, P ;
Liu, CJ ;
Reddy, MSS ;
Wang, LJ .
MOLECULAR PLANT PATHOLOGY, 2002, 3 (05) :371-390
[7]   Tissue-specific signatures of metabolites and proteins in asparagus roots and exudates [J].
Doell, Stefanie ;
Farahani-Kofoet, Roxana Djalali ;
Zrenner, Rita ;
Henze, Andrea ;
Witzel, Katja .
HORTICULTURE RESEARCH, 2021, 8 (01)
[8]  
Elmer W., 2018, Acta Horticulturae, P195, DOI 10.17660/ActaHortic.2018.1223.27
[9]   Management of Fusarium crown and root rot of asparagus [J].
Elmer, Wade H. .
CROP PROTECTION, 2015, 73 :2-6
[10]  
Elmer WH, 2001, FUSARIUM: PAUL E. NELSON MEMORIAL SYMPOSIUM, P248