The latent failure probability: A conceptual basis for robust, reliability-based and risk-based design optimization

被引:21
作者
Beck, Andre T. [1 ]
da Silva, Lucas A. Rodrigues [1 ]
Miguel, Leandro F. F. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Struct Engn, Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Santa Catarina, Dept Civil Engn, Florianopolis, SC, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Optimal redundancy allocation; Design optimization; System reliability; RBDO; Risk-based optimization; Robust design; Latent failure probability; Epistemic uncertainties; Progressive collapse; Non-technical factors; R3DO; HUMAN ERROR; STRUCTURAL DESIGN; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ress.2023.109127
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The safety of structural systems depends on social, political, financial, organizational, behavioral, and other non-structural factors. These factors are related to use of the structure and its environment, malevolent and other unanticipated accidental loading, construction method and experience of construction crews, gross errors, monitoring to prevent abuse, etc. The above can broadly be classified as non-technical factors, involving sig-nificant epistemic uncertainty. In this manuscript, we formalize a procedure to handle non-technical factors and/ or epistemic uncertainties in Robust, Reliability-based and Risk-based structural Design Optimization (R3DO). We propose that latent failure probabilities, subjective point-estimates reflecting non-technical factors and/or epistemic uncertainties, be added to the nominal member failure probabilities, calculated from objective aleatory uncertainty (technical factors). Latent failure probabilities are subjectively estimated by the analysis team, based on a holistic risk analysis addressing the technical and non-technical factors above. The relevance and impact of latent failure probabilities in R3DO have already been demonstrated elsewhere; these results are briefly recapped herein. We demonstrate that structural systems should be made redundant, not because of objective aleatory uncertainties in loads and material strengths, but to cope with the large impact of subjective epistemic un-certainties related to non-technical factors.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   Reliability-based optimization of structural systems by adaptive target safety - Application to RC frames [J].
Aoues, Younes ;
Chateauneuf, Alaa .
STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2008, 30 (02) :144-161
[2]   On the assessment of robustness [J].
Baker, Jack W. ;
Schubert, Matthias ;
Faber, Michael H. .
STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2008, 30 (03) :253-267
[3]   Risk-Based Design of Regular Plane Frames Subject to Damage by Abnormal Events: A Conceptual Study [J].
Beck, Andre T. ;
Ribeiro, Lucas da Rosa ;
Valdebenito, Marcos ;
Jensen, Hector .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 148 (01)
[4]   Risk-based cost-benefit analysis of frame structures considering progressive collapse under column removal scenarios [J].
Beck, Andre T. ;
Ribeiro, Lucas da Rosa ;
Valdebenito, Marcos .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2020, 225
[5]   Optimal design of redundant structural systems: fundamentals [J].
Beck, Andre T. .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2020, 219
[6]   System reliability-based design optimization and risk-based optimization: a benchmark example considering progressive collapse [J].
Beck, Andre T. ;
Tessari, Rodolfo K. ;
Kroetz, Henrique M. .
ENGINEERING OPTIMIZATION, 2019, 51 (06) :1000-1012
[7]   A comparison between robust and risk-based optimization under uncertainty [J].
Beck, Andre T. ;
Gomes, Wellison J. S. ;
Lopez, Rafael H. ;
Miguel, Leandro F. F. .
STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2015, 52 (03) :479-492
[8]   ON THE ROBUSTNESS OF STRUCTURAL RISK OPTIMIZATION WITH RESPECT TO EPISTEMIC UNCERTAINTIES [J].
Beck, Andre T. ;
Gomes, W. J. S. ;
Bazan, F. A. V. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION, 2012, 2 (01) :1-20
[9]  
Beck AT, 2008, LAT AM J SOLIDS STRU, V5, P187
[10]   A comparison of deterministic, reliability-based and risk-based structural optimization under uncertainty [J].
Beck, Andre Teofilo ;
de Santana Gomes, Wellison Jose .
PROBABILISTIC ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 2012, 28 :18-29