Optimal Environmental Targeting in the Amazon Rainforest

被引:13
作者
Assuncao, Juliano [1 ]
McMillan, Robert [2 ,3 ]
Murphy, Joshua [4 ]
Souza-Rodrigues, Eduardo [2 ]
机构
[1] Pontificia Univ Catolica Rio de Janeiro, Dept Econ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Econ, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] NBER, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[4] Nat Resources Canada, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
Policy targeting; Optimal regulation; Monitoring; Deforestation; Amazon; Carbon emissions; Changes-in-changes; Resource constraints; Partial identification; Minimax ambiguity; Treatment assignment; PARTIAL KNOWLEDGE; CLIMATE-CHANGE; SOCIAL COST; DEFORESTATION; CARBON; ENFORCEMENT; IDENTIFICATION; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1093/restud/rdac064
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This article sets out a data-driven approach for targeting environmental policies optimally in order to combat deforestation. We focus on the Amazon, the world's most extensive rainforest, where Brazil's federal government issued a "Priority List" of municipalities in 2008-a blacklist to be targeted with more intense environmental monitoring and enforcement. First, we estimate the causal impact of the Priority List on deforestation (along with other relevant treatment effects) using "changes-in-changes" due to Athey and Imbens (2006), finding that it reduced deforestation by 43% and cut emissions by almost 50 million tons of carbon. Second, we develop a novel framework for computing targeted optimal blacklists that draws on our treatment effect estimates, assigning municipalities to a counterfactual list that minimizes total deforestation subject to realistic resource constraints. We show that the ex post optimal list would result in carbon emissions over 10% lower than the actual list, amounting to savings of more than $1.2 billion (34% of the total value of the Priority List), with emissions over 23% lower on average than a randomly selected list. The approach we propose is relevant both for assessing targeted counterfactual policies to reduce deforestation and for quantifying the impacts of policy targeting more generally.
引用
收藏
页码:1608 / 1641
页数:34
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   SAMPLING-BASED VERSUS DESIGN-BASED UNCERTAINTY IN REGRESSION ANALYSIS [J].
Abadie, Alberto ;
Athey, Susan ;
Imbens, Guido W. ;
Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. .
ECONOMETRICA, 2020, 88 (01) :265-296
[2]   Only One Tree from Each Seed? Environmental Effectiveness and Poverty Alleviation in Mexico's Payments for Ecosystem Services Program [J].
Alix-Garcia, Jennifer M. ;
Sims, Katharine R. E. ;
Yanez-Pagans, Patricia .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-ECONOMIC POLICY, 2015, 7 (04) :1-40
[3]  
Andersen L.E., 2002, DYNAMICS DEFORESTATI
[4]  
ANDRADE L., 2016, 201632 U SAO PAUL DE
[5]   Public policies can reduce tropical deforestation: Lessons and challenges from Brazil [J].
Arima, Eugenio Y. ;
Barreto, Paulo ;
Araujo, Elis ;
Soares-Filho, Britaldo .
LAND USE POLICY, 2014, 41 :465-473
[6]  
ASSUNCAO J., 2017, DETERING DEFORESTATI
[7]  
Assuncao J., 2019, The Forest Awakens: Amazon Regeneration and Policy Spillover
[8]   Getting greener by going black: the effect of blacklisting municipalities on Amazon deforestation [J].
Assuncao, Juliano ;
Rocha, Romero .
ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2019, 24 (02) :115-137
[9]   Identification and inference in nonlinear difference-in-differences models [J].
Athey, S ;
Imbens, GW .
ECONOMETRICA, 2006, 74 (02) :431-497
[10]   Estimated carbon dioxide emissions from tropical deforestation improved by carbon-density maps [J].
Baccini, A. ;
Goetz, S. J. ;
Walker, W. S. ;
Laporte, N. T. ;
Sun, M. ;
Sulla-Menashe, D. ;
Hackler, J. ;
Beck, P. S. A. ;
Dubayah, R. ;
Friedl, M. A. ;
Samanta, S. ;
Houghton, R. A. .
NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2012, 2 (03) :182-185