Sociology from a Distance: Remote Interviews and Feminist Methods

被引:8
作者
O'Quinn, Jamie [1 ]
Slaymaker, Erika [1 ]
Goldstein-Kral, Jess [1 ]
Broussard, Kathleen [1 ]
机构
[1] Calif State Univ, Dept Sociol, 5500 Univ Pkwy, San Bernardino, CA 92407 USA
关键词
Qualitative Research; Remote methods; Feminism; Embodiment; SKYPE;
D O I
10.1007/s11133-024-09556-y
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted many aspects of life, including how social scientists develop and conduct research. Transitioning to remote interview methods was one methodological adjustment made by many qualitative researchers. In this article, we draw on in-depth interviews (N=106) and fieldnotes from three qualitative research projects conducted remotely during the COVID-19 pandemic, all of which center the experiences of women across a wide range of topics. In this article, we consider the opportunities and challenges of remote interviewing as a feminist method of research, analyzing how remote interviews impact both those who participate in and conduct research. We find that remote interview methods offer potential advantages for conducting participant-centered research, as they provide an opportunity for new forms of emotional engagement and options for privacy. In addition, remote methods have the capacity to increase accessibility for both participants and researchers alike. As such, remote interview methods address several feminist methodological and epistemological concerns about qualitative social scientific research, including those related to accessibility, privacy, and relationality. We weigh these advantages with the unique challenges that remote interviewing brings, including potential technological difficulties and additional considerations regarding privacy. We conclude by discussing the future of remote interview methods and consider their ability to address structural factors that shape feminist qualitative research.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 67
页数:25
相关论文
共 63 条
[11]  
Collins P H., 2000, BLACK FEMINIST THOUG, DOI [10.4324/9780203900055, DOI 10.4324/9780203900055]
[12]  
Compton D'Lane., 2018, OTHER PLEASE SPECIFY
[13]   Decolonizing Sociology [J].
Connell, Raewyn .
CONTEMPORARY SOCIOLOGY-A JOURNAL OF REVIEWS, 2018, 47 (04) :399-407
[14]   The Paradox of Positionality: Avoiding, Embracing, or Resisting Feminist Accountability [J].
Davis, Georgiann ;
Khonach, Torisha .
FAT STUDIES-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF BODY WEIGHT AND SOCIETY, 2020, 9 (02) :101-113
[15]   Skype interviewing: reflections of two PhD researchers [J].
Deakin, Hannah ;
Wakefield, Kelly .
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH, 2014, 14 (05) :603-616
[16]   Flexible Coding of In-depth Interviews: A Twenty-first-century Approach [J].
Deterding, Nicole M. ;
Waters, Mary C. .
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 2021, 50 (02) :708-739
[17]  
DeVault M.L., 2012, Handbook of feminist research: Theory and practice, V2nd, ppp, DOI [10.4135/9781483384740, DOI 10.4135/9781483384740]
[18]   Talking back to sociology: Distinctive contributions of feminist methodology [J].
DeVault, ML .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY, 1996, 22 :29-50
[19]  
Fields Jessica., 2016, Women's Studies Quarterly, V44, P31, DOI [10.1353/wsq.2016.0034, DOI 10.1353/WSQ.2016.0034]
[20]  
Frederiksen B, 2021, Womens Experiences with Health Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Findings from the KFF Womens Health Survey