Effect of filler contents on the bond strength of CAD/CAM resin crowns: New resin primer versus conventional silane agents

被引:5
作者
Hagino, Ryosuke [1 ,6 ]
Mine, Atsushi [1 ,6 ]
Aoki-Matsumoto, Mariko [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Miura, Jiro [5 ]
Yumitate, Masahiro [1 ]
Ban, Shintaro [1 ]
Ishida, Masaya [1 ]
Takaishi, Munechika [1 ]
Van Meerbeek, Bart [3 ,4 ]
Yatani, Hirofumi [1 ]
Ishigaki, Shoichi [1 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Univ, Grad Sch Dent, Dept Fixed Prosthodont, Osaka, Japan
[2] Hokkaido Univ, Dept Restorat Dent, Grad Sch Dent Med, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
[3] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Univ Leuven, BIOMAT, Leuven, Belgium
[4] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Univ Leuven, Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Oral Hlth Sci, Leuven, Belgium
[5] Osaka Univ, Dent Hosp, Div Interdisciplinary Dent, Osaka, Japan
[6] Osaka Univ, Grad Sch Dent, Dept Fixed Prosthodont, 1 8 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 5650871, Japan
关键词
Adhesive dentistry; Longevity; Micro-tensile bond strength; Scanning electron microscopy; Transmission elec-tron microscopy; SURFACE TREATMENTS; COMPOSITE RESIN; SELF-ADHESIVE; DENTAL APPLICATIONS; COUPLING AGENTS; CEMENTS; BLOCKS; TEETH;
D O I
10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_22_00301
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the effects of resin primers containing methyl methacrylate (MMA) and silane agent on the bonding effectiveness of indirect resin composite blocks with three different filler contents.Methods: A commercially available computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) resin composite block and two experimental resin composite blocks with different filler contents were alumina-blasted and two surface treatments (primer and silane agent) were applied. The resin cement was built up, and the micro-tensile bond strength (mu TBS) was measured after 24 hours, 1 month or 3 months of water storage (n = 24 per group). The fracture surfaces after mu TBS measurements and resin block/cement interface were observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM).Results: The primer treatment group showed a significantly higher bond strength than the silane group only in F0 (filler content 0 wt%) group (P < 0.001). In the primer group, F0 and F41 (filler content 41 wt%) groups showed significantly higher bond strengths than F82 (filler content 82 wt%) group (P < 0.001). In contrast, in the silane group, F41 group showed significantly higher bond strength than F0 and F82 groups (P < 0.001), and F82 group showed significantly higher bond strength than F0 group (P < 0.001). SEM revealed that the matrix resin was partially destroyed on the fracture surface of the primer group, and an uneven interface surface was observed compared with that of the silane group.Conclusions: MMA-containing primers showed higher bonding effectiveness to CAD/CAM resin composite blocks than the silane treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 289
页数:7
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Microtensile Bond Strength of Lithium Disilicate Ceramics to Resin Adhesives [J].
Aboushelib, Moustafa N. ;
Sleem, Donia .
JOURNAL OF ADHESIVE DENTISTRY, 2014, 16 (06) :547-552
[2]   The hydrolysis/condensation behaviour of methacryloyloxyalkylfunctional alkoxysilanes: Structure-reactivity relations [J].
Altmann, S ;
Pfeiffer, J .
MONATSHEFTE FUR CHEMIE, 2003, 134 (08) :1081-1092
[3]   Load-bearing capacity of handmade and computer-aided design-computer-aided manufacturing-fabricated three-unit fixed dental prostheses of particulate filler composite [J].
Basaran, Emine Goncu ;
Ayna, Emrah ;
Vallittu, Pekka K. ;
Lassila, Lippo V. J. .
ACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2011, 69 (03) :144-150
[4]   Effect of different etching periods on the bond strength of a composite resin to a machinable porcelain [J].
Chen, JH ;
Matsumura, H ;
Atsuta, M .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 1998, 26 (01) :53-58
[5]   The Effect of Surface Treatments on the Bond Strength Between CAD/CAM Blocks and Composite Resin [J].
Duzyol, Mustafa ;
Sagsoz, Omer ;
Sagsoz, Nurdan Polat ;
Akgul, Nilgun ;
Yildiz, Mehmet .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2016, 25 (06) :466-471
[6]   Microtensile bond strength testing of luting cements to prefabricated CAD/CAM ceramic and composite blocks [J].
El Zohairy, AA ;
De Gee, AJ ;
Mohsen, MM ;
Feilzer, AJ .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 2003, 19 (07) :575-583
[7]  
Fujii T, 2017, ADHES DENT, V35, P83
[8]   Bonding between CAD/CAM resin and resin composite cements dependent on bonding agents: three different in vitro test methods [J].
Gilbert, Simona ;
Keul, Christine ;
Roos, Malgorzata ;
Edelhoff, Daniel ;
Stawarczyk, Bogna .
CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2016, 20 (02) :227-236
[9]   Effect of surface treatments on shear bond strength of resin composite bonded to CAD/CAM resin-ceramic hybrid materials [J].
Gungor, Merve Bankoglu ;
Nemli, Secil Karakoca ;
Bal, Bilge Turhan ;
Unver, Senem ;
Dogan, Aylin .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED PROSTHODONTICS, 2016, 8 (04) :259-266
[10]  
Hagino R, 2020, ADHES DENT, V38, P15