Mechanical Characterization of Compliant Cellular Robots. Part I: Passive Stiffness

被引:1
作者
Singh, Gaurav [1 ]
Nawroj, Ahsan [2 ]
Dollar, Aaron M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Dept Mech Engn, New Haven, CT 06511 USA
[2] Yale Univ, Dept Mech Engn & Mat Sci, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF MECHANISMS AND ROBOTICS-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME | 2023年 / 15卷 / 02期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
bio-inspired design; compliant mechanisms; robot design; soft robots; TOPOLOGY OPTIMIZATION; HOMOGENIZATION; PREDICTION; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1115/1.4054615
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Modular active cell robots (MACROs) are a design paradigm for modular robotic hardware that uses only two components, namely actuators and passive compliant joints. Under the MACRO approach, a large number of actuators and joints are connected to create mesh-like cellular robotic structures that can be actuated to achieve large deformation and shape change. In this two-part paper, we study the importance of different possible mesh topologies within the MACRO framework. Regular and semi-regular tilings of the plane are used as the candidate mesh topologies and simulated using finite element analysis (FEA). In Part 1, we use FEA to evaluate their passive stiffness characteristics. Using a strain-energy method, the homogenized material properties (Young's modulus, shear modulus, and Poisson's ratio) of the different mesh topologies are computed and compared. The results show that the stiffnesses increase with increasing nodal connectivity and that stretching-dominated topologies have higher stiffness compared to bending-dominated ones. We also investigate the role of relative actuator-node stiffness on the overall mesh characteristics. This analysis shows that the stiffness of stretching-dominated topologies scales directly with their cross-section area whereas bending-dominated ones do not have such a direct relationship.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Large strain compressive response of 2-D periodic representative volume element for random foam microstructures [J].
Alsayednoor, J. ;
Harrison, P. ;
Guo, Z. .
MECHANICS OF MATERIALS, 2013, 66 :7-20
[2]   Mechanical metamaterials: a state of the art [J].
Barchiesi, Emilio ;
Spagnuolo, Mario ;
Placidi, Luca .
MATHEMATICS AND MECHANICS OF SOLIDS, 2019, 24 (01) :212-234
[3]   Flexible mechanical metamaterials [J].
Bertoldi, Katia ;
Vitelli, Vincenzo ;
Christensen, Johan ;
van Hecke, Martin .
NATURE REVIEWS MATERIALS, 2017, 2 (11)
[4]  
Chen IM, 2016, SPRINGER HANDBOOK OF ROBOTICS, P531
[5]  
Gibson L.J., 1997, CELLULAR SOLIDS STRU, DOI [DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139878326, 10.1017/CBO9781139878326]
[6]  
Grunbaum B., 1977, Mathematics Magazine, V50, P227, DOI [DOI 10.1080/0025570X.1977.11976655, 10.2307/2689529]
[7]   Programmable Elastic Metamaterials [J].
Haghpanah, Babak ;
Ebrahimi, Hamid ;
Mousanezhad, Davood ;
Hopkins, Jonathan ;
Vaziri, Ashkan .
ADVANCED ENGINEERING MATERIALS, 2016, 18 (04) :643-649
[8]   A review of homogenization and topology optimization I - homogenization theory for media with periodic structure [J].
Hassani, B ;
Hinton, E .
COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 1998, 69 (06) :707-717
[9]   MECHANISMS OF PERISTALSIS [J].
HIRST, GDS .
BRITISH MEDICAL BULLETIN, 1979, 35 (03) :263-268
[10]  
Lieber RL, 2000, MUSCLE NERVE, V23, P1647, DOI 10.1002/1097-4598(200011)23:11<1647::AID-MUS1>3.0.CO