Economic and Environmental Sustainability Assessment of an Innovative Organic Broccoli Production Pattern

被引:5
|
作者
Scuderi, Alessandro [1 ]
Timpanaro, Giuseppe [1 ]
Branca, Ferdinando [1 ]
Cammarata, Mariarita [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Catania, Dept Agr Food & Environm, I-95129 Catania, Italy
来源
AGRONOMY-BASEL | 2023年 / 13卷 / 03期
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
gross income; horticulture; Italy; LCA; vegetable; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; CARBON; AGRICULTURE; IMPACT; CROPS; LCA;
D O I
10.3390/agronomy13030624
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Organic farming nowadays is held up as a model of sustainability; however, this is not always an economic advantage for farmers due to the reduced yields compared to the conventional regime. The aim of the study is therefore to provide an environmental and economic analysis of the innovative organic model proposed by the Bresov project to assess its sustainability. The study is therefore based on a Life Cycle Assessment methodology and the economic evaluation, through the calculation of the gross income of innovative organic and conventional broccoli cultivation in Sicily. The impact categories analysed reported a 60-100% reduction in impact in the case of innovative organic compared to conventional. From an economic point of view, although there is a minimal reduction in yield in organic compared to conventional, there is an increase in production costs that translates into a reduction in the gross income of approximately 61%. These gaps are filled when the organic product is granted a premium price and thanks to aid from the Common Agricultural Policy. The innovative organic approach, characterised by new products and soil management methods, confirms it as an alternative to conventional. This approach contrasts with the mere substitution of synthetic products.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Life cycle environmental and economic assessment of raw silk production in China
    Wu, Zhaoshan
    Xu, Wenqiang
    Wu, Xiongying
    Ding, Xuemei
    SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2025, 55 : 11 - 23
  • [42] Assessment of economic viability and production costs for the innovative microfiltered digestate
    Pappalardo, Gioacchino
    Trimarchi, Ettore
    Selvaggi, Roberta
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 332
  • [43] A Life Cycle and Economic Assessment of the Peggy Guggenheim Collection in Venice for Environmental and Economic Sustainability
    Onofri, Laura
    Ojeda, Cristina
    Ruiz-Gauna, Itziar
    Greno, Francisco
    Markandya, Anil
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (16)
  • [44] Environmental Impact and Sustainability of Bioplastic Production from Food Waste
    Synani, Katerina
    Abeliotis, Konstadinos
    Velonia, Kelly
    Maragkaki, Angeliki
    Manios, Thrassyvoulos
    Lasaridi, Katia
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (13)
  • [45] Life Cycle Assessment and Economic Analysis of an Innovative Biogas Membrane Reformer for Hydrogen Production
    Di Marcoberardino, Gioele
    Liao, Xun
    Dauriat, Arnaud
    Binotti, Marco
    Manzolini, Giampaolo
    PROCESSES, 2019, 7 (02):
  • [46] Economic and environmental assessment of organic waste to biomethane conversion
    Gupta, Rohit
    Miller, Royce
    Sloan, William
    You, Siming
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 345
  • [47] Assessing the Environmental and Economic Sustainability of Functional Food Ingredient Production Process
    Priyadarshini, Anushree
    Tiwari, Brijesh K.
    Rajauria, Gaurav
    PROCESSES, 2022, 10 (03)
  • [48] Economic and environmental sustainability of maize-wheat rotation production when substituting mineral fertilizers with manure in the North China Plain
    Li, Shuo
    Wu, Jiechen
    Wang, Xiaoqin
    Ma, Lin
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 271
  • [49] Environmental sustainability assessment of bio-ethanol production in Thailand
    Silalertruksa, Thapat
    Gheewala, Shabbir H.
    ENERGY, 2009, 34 (11) : 1933 - 1946
  • [50] Sustainability assessment of energy systems: integrating environmental, economic and social aspects
    Santoyo-Castelazo, Edgar
    Azapagic, Adisa
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2014, 80 : 119 - 138