Self-citation behavior within the health allied professions' scientific sector in Italy: a bibliometric analysis

被引:3
|
作者
Vercelli, Stefano [1 ]
Pellicciari, Leonardo [2 ]
Croci, Andrea
Cornaggia, Cesare Maria [3 ]
Cecchi, Francesca [2 ,4 ]
Piscitelli, Daniele [3 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Inst Veruno, Phys & Rehabil Med Unit, Ist Clin Sci Maugeri, IRCCS, Gattico Veruno, NO, Italy
[2] IRCCS Fdn Don Carlo Gnocchi, Via Scandicci 269, I-50143 Florence, Italy
[3] Univ Milano Bicocca, Sch Med & Surg, Milan, Italy
[4] Univ Florence, Dept Expt & Clin Med, Florence, Italy
[5] McGill Univ, Sch Phys & Occupat Therapy, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[6] Univ Connecticut, Dept Kinesiol, Phys Therapy Program, Storrs, CT USA
关键词
Academic productivity; Bibliometrics; Citation analysis; H-index; Physiotherapy; Rehabilitation; ACADEMIA; INDEX;
D O I
10.1007/s11192-022-04599-w
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
National scientific qualification (NSQ) is a procedure to regulate access to Italian academic positions. An increased use of self-citations could favor the achievement of the minimum bibliometric requirements. The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze the self-citing behavior of successful candidates who applied for the NSQ in the Allied Health Professions (AHP) scientific field. Bibliometric indexes of all candidates qualified in the three first sessions (2012, 2013, and 2016) were retrieved from the Scopus database. We developed a new index (delta SCR) to detect changes in the candidate's habits based on the difference between the Self Citation Rate (SCR) in the year preceding NSQ and that of the previous 10 years. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to analyze the delta SCR between sessions. Multivariate regressions were run to investigate the relationship between delta SCR and six independent factors. Differences in delta SCR were found between 2012 and 2013 (p = 0.008), between 2013 and 2016 (p < 0.0001), but not between 2012 and 2016 (p = 1.000). Regressions showed highest R-2 in delta SCR >= 10 subsets (2012: R-2 = 0.373; 2013: R-2 = 0.645; 2016: R-2 = 0.511). The difference in citation habits (delta C) was a significant delta SCR predictor in 2012 and 2013, while publication habits (delta P) and the difference in the H-index with vs. without self-citations (delta H) were significant variables in 2012 and 2016, respectively. In the AHP sector, there was an increase in the use of self-citations in the 2013 session. Higher delta SCR was associated with delta C, delta H and delta P.
引用
收藏
页码:1205 / 1217
页数:13
相关论文
共 3 条
  • [1] Self-citation behavior within the health allied professions’ scientific sector in Italy: a bibliometric analysis
    Stefano Vercelli
    Leonardo Pellicciari
    Andrea Croci
    Cesare Maria Cornaggia
    Francesca Cecchi
    Daniele Piscitelli
    Scientometrics, 2023, 128 : 1205 - 1217
  • [2] JOURNAL SELF-CITATION RATES AND IMPACT FACTORS IN DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY, AND MEDICINE: A 3-YEAR BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS
    Livas, Christos
    Delli, Konstantina
    JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASED DENTAL PRACTICE, 2018, 18 (04) : 269 - 274
  • [3] The Hirsch-index in self-citation rates with articles in Medicine (Baltimore) Bibliometric analysis of publications in two stages from 2018 to 2021
    Liu, Mei-Yuan
    Chien, Tsair-Wei
    Chou, Willy
    MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (45) : E31609