Relation Between Objective Space Normalization and Weight Vector Scaling in Decomposition-Based Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms

被引:6
作者
He, Linjun [1 ,2 ]
Shang, Ke [1 ]
Nan, Yang [1 ]
Ishibuchi, Hisao [1 ]
Srinivasan, Dipti [3 ]
机构
[1] Southern Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Guangdong Prov Key Lab Brain Inspired Intelligent, Shenzhen 518055, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Singapore 117575, Singapore
[3] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Singapore 117575, Singapore
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Decomposition-based multiobjective evolutionary algorithm (MOEA); evolutionary multiobjective optimization (EMO); objective space normalization; weight vector adjustment; weight vector scaling; OPTIMIZATION; DESIGN; MOEA/D;
D O I
10.1109/TEVC.2022.3192100
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Real-world multiobjective optimization problems (MOPs) usually have conflicting and differently scaled objectives. To deal with such problems, objective space normalization is widely used in the multiobjective evolutionary algorithm (MOEA) design, especially, in the design of decomposition-based MOEAs. It has been demonstrated that uniformly distributed solutions can be obtained for badly scaled MOPs by decomposition-based MOEAs with objective space normalization. Recently, weight vector scaling has also been used for badly scaled MOPs. In some studies, it was argued that weight vector scaling and objective space normalization are essentially the same when applied to decomposition-based MOEAs. In this article, we theoretically and empirically show the relation between objective space normalization and weight vector scaling. Our results demonstrate that similarities and differences between the two methods depend on the choice of a scalarizing function. How the choice between normalization and weight vector scaling affects decomposition-based MOEAs with solution assignment mechanisms is also analyzed.
引用
收藏
页码:1177 / 1191
页数:15
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
Blank Julian, 2019, Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization. 10th International Conference, EMO 2019. Proceedings: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS 11411), P229, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-12598-1_19
[2]   The balance between proximity and diversity in multiobjective evolutionary algorithms [J].
Bosman, PAN ;
Thierens, D .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2003, 7 (02) :174-188
[3]   Effect of Objective Normalization and Penalty Parameter on Penalty Boundary Intersection Decomposition-Based Evolutionary Many-Objective Optimization Algorithms [J].
Chen, Lei ;
Deb, Kalyanmoy ;
Liu, Hai-Lin ;
Zhang, Qingfu .
EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2021, 29 (01) :157-186
[4]   A Reference Vector Guided Evolutionary Algorithm for Many-Objective Optimization [J].
Cheng, Ran ;
Jin, Yaochu ;
Olhofer, Markus ;
Sendhoff, Bernhard .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2016, 20 (05) :773-791
[5]  
Deb K, 2002, IEEE C EVOL COMPUTAT, P825, DOI 10.1109/CEC.2002.1007032
[6]   An Evolutionary Many-Objective Optimization Algorithm Using Reference-Point-Based Nondominated Sorting Approach, Part I: Solving Problems With Box Constraints [J].
Deb, Kalyanmoy ;
Jain, Himanshu .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2014, 18 (04) :577-601
[7]  
Fukumoto H, 2019, 2019 IEEE SYMPOSIUM SERIES ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE (IEEE SSCI 2019), P2138, DOI 10.1109/SSCI44817.2019.9002760
[8]   A Multiple Surrogate Assisted Decomposition-Based Evolutionary Algorithm for Expensive Multi/Many-Objective Optimization [J].
Habib, Ahsanul ;
Singh, Hemant Kumar ;
Chugh, Tinkle ;
Ray, Tapabrata ;
Miettinen, Kaisa .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2019, 23 (06) :1000-1014
[9]   A Survey of Normalization Methods in Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms [J].
He, Linjun ;
Ishibuchi, Hisao ;
Trivedi, Anupam ;
Wang, Handing ;
Nan, Yang ;
Srinivasan, Dipti .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2021, 25 (06) :1028-1048
[10]  
He LJ, 2020, IEEE C EVOL COMPUTAT