The relevance of ERG immunoexpression intensity for prostatic adenocarcinoma in radical prostatectomy of 635 samples

被引:0
作者
Feitosa, Priscilla Mariana Freitas Aguiar [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Hirth, Carlos Gustavo [1 ,3 ]
Silva-Fernandes, Isabelle Joyce De Lima [4 ]
Dornelas, Conceicao Aparecida [1 ,3 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Ceara, Dept Pathol & Forens Med, Fortaleza, Brazil
[2] Argos Lab Fortaleza, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Ceara, Fortaleza, Brazil
[4] Haroldo Juacaba Hosp, Ceara Canc Inst, Genet Dept, Fortaleza, Brazil
[5] Univ Fed Ceara, Fac Med Med Surg Med Sci, Fortaleza, Brazil
[6] Univ Estado Rio De Janeiro, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
关键词
prostate cancer; ERG; immunohistochemistry; prostatectomy; prostatic neoplasm; pathology of tumors; CANCER; FUSION; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; TMPRSS2;
D O I
10.1111/apm.13330
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Prostate cancer is the world's most frequently diagnosed malignancy in men. Recent work suggests that patients with high ERG expression intensity are significantly more likely to develop biochemical relapse and metastasis, and die of prostate cancer. The objective of this study was to determine the relationship between the intensity of ERG protein expression and the staging of prostate cancer and the formation of metastases in 635 samples. A retrospective cohort analysis was performed using immunohistochemistry reactions in tissue microarray samples taken from non-neoplastic and neoplastic prostate tissue from patients who underwent radical prostatectomies at a reference hospital from 2009 to 2016. For the ERG marker analysis, the samples were scored for the presence or absence of nuclear signals. Weak, moderate, or strong intensity of the nuclei of the observable tumor cells was considered to be positive markers. All told, 635 samples were evaluated, and the ERG expression was inconclusive in 9% of cases, while 30% were positive and 61% were negative. Of the samples with positive result: 25.8% were weak and focal, 53.2% were moderate, and 21% were strong. Finally, 21% of the cases with a positive ERG had a high Gleason score. Metastasis was detected in 41% of the patients who were ERG positive, and of these, the majority had moderate marking and were aged older than 60 years, although there was no statistically significant difference between the older and younger age groups. Patients with moderate to strong ERG staining had higher staging compared to the others, and no increase in metastasis was detected in patients with more intense ERG expression. More studies should be carried out to corroborate these results and to reach a consensus on the intensity and scoring of the expression levels of ERG markers.
引用
收藏
页码:465 / 471
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Andrade Victor Piana de, 2007, J. Bras. Patol. Med. Lab., V43, P55, DOI 10.1590/S1676-24442007000100011
  • [2] Molecular Subtypes of Prostate Cancer
    Arora, Kaveri
    Barbieri, Christopher E.
    [J]. CURRENT ONCOLOGY REPORTS, 2018, 20 (08)
  • [3] Duplication of the fusion of TMPRSS2 to ERG sequences identifies fatal human prostate cancer
    Attard, G.
    Clark, J.
    Ambroisine, L.
    Fisher, G.
    Kovacs, G.
    Flohr, P.
    Berney, D.
    Foster, C. S.
    Fletcher, A.
    Gerald, W. L.
    Moller, H.
    Reuter, V.
    De Bono, J. S.
    Scardino, P.
    Cuzick, J.
    Cooper, C. S.
    [J]. ONCOGENE, 2008, 27 (03) : 253 - 263
  • [4] Clinical utility of assessing PTEN and ERG protein expression in prostate cancer patients: a proposed method for risk stratification
    Bismar, Tarek A.
    Hegazy, Samar
    Feng, Zhaoyong
    Yu, Darryl
    Donnelly, Bryan
    Palanisamy, Nallasivam
    Trock, Bruce J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 144 (11) : 2117 - 2125
  • [5] ERG protein expression reflects hormonal treatment response and is associated with Gleason score and prostate cancer specific mortality
    Bismar, Tarek A.
    Dolph, Michael
    Teng, Liang-Hong
    Liu, Shuhong
    Donnelly, Bryan
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 48 (04) : 538 - 546
  • [6] Effect of pathologic revision and Ki67 and ERG immunohistochemistry on predicting radical prostatectomy outcome in men initially on active surveillance
    Bokhorst, Leonard P.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    Bangma, Chris H.
    van Leenders, Geert J.
    [J]. PROSTATE, 2017, 77 (10) : 1137 - 1143
  • [7] Risk Assessment Among Prostate Cancer Patients Receiving Primary Androgen Deprivation Therapy
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    Hinotsu, Shiro
    Namiki, Mikio
    Ito, Kazuto
    Broering, Jeanette
    Carroll, Peter R.
    Akaza, Hideyuki
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (26) : 4306 - 4313
  • [8] Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer
    D'Amico, AV
    Whittington, R
    Malkowicz, SB
    Schultz, D
    Blank, K
    Broderick, GA
    Tomaszewski, JE
    Renshaw, AA
    Kaplan, I
    Beard, CJ
    Wein, A
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (11): : 969 - 974
  • [9] TMPRSS2-ERG fusion is frequently observed in gleason pattern 3 prostate cancer in a canadian cohort
    Darnel, Andrew D.
    LaFargue, Christopher J.
    Vollmer, Robin T.
    Corcos, Jacques
    Bismar, Tarek A.
    [J]. CANCER BIOLOGY & THERAPY, 2009, 8 (02) : 125 - 130
  • [10] Gasi D, 2011, METHODS MOL BIOL, V776, P335, DOI 10.1007/978-1-61779-243-4_19