共 50 条
Somatosensory omissions reveal action-related predictive processing
被引:3
作者:
Dercksen, Tjerk T.
[1
,2
]
Widmann, Andreas
[1
,3
]
Noesselt, Toemme
[2
,4
]
Wetzel, Nicole
[1
,2
,5
]
机构:
[1] Leibniz Inst Neurobiol, Res Grp Neurocognit Dev, Magdeburg, Germany
[2] Ctr Behav Brain Sci, Magdeburg, Germany
[3] Univ Leipzig, Wilhelm Wundt Inst Psychol, Leipzig, Germany
[4] Otto von Guericke Univ, Dept Biol Psychol, Magdeburg, Germany
[5] Univ Appl Sci Magdeburg Stendal, Stendal, Germany
关键词:
EEG;
efference copy;
motor;
predictive coding;
AUDITORY-EVOKED POTENTIALS;
POSTERIOR PARIETAL CORTEX;
MISMATCH NEGATIVITY;
N1;
WAVE;
REPETITION SUPPRESSION;
NEURAL BASIS;
ATTENUATION;
ATTENTION;
COMPONENT;
RESPONSES;
D O I:
10.1002/hbm.26550
中图分类号:
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号:
071006 ;
摘要:
The intricate relation between action and somatosensory perception has been studied extensively in the past decades. Generally, a forward model is thought to predict the somatosensory consequences of an action. These models propose that when an action is reliably coupled to a tactile stimulus, unexpected absence of the stimulus should elicit prediction error. Although such omission responses have been demonstrated in the auditory modality, it remains unknown whether this mechanism generalizes across modalities. This study therefore aimed to record action-induced somatosensory omission responses using EEG in humans. Self-paced button presses were coupled to somatosensory stimuli in 88% of trials, allowing a prediction, or in 50% of trials, not allowing a prediction. In the 88% condition, stimulus omission resulted in a neural response consisting of multiple components, as revealed by temporal principal component analysis. The oN1 response suggests similar sensory sources as stimulus-evoked activity, but an origin outside primary cortex. Subsequent oN2 and oP3 responses, as previously observed in the auditory domain, likely reflect modality-unspecific higher order processes. Together, findings straightforwardly demonstrate somatosensory predictions during action and provide evidence for a partially amodal mechanism of prediction error generation. Participants repeatedly pressed a button that mostly (88%), sporadically (50%), or never (motor) resulted in a tactile stimulus. Comparing tactile omissions between conditions, a brain response was only recorded in the 88%-condition, where a stimulus prediction was present. This response presumably reflects prediction error on multiple levels in the brain.image
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条