The performance of artificial intelligence language models in board-style dental knowledge assessment A preliminary study on ChatGPT

被引:18
作者
Danesh, Arman [1 ,5 ]
Pazouki, Hirad [2 ]
Danesh, Kasra [3 ]
Danesh, Farzad
Danesh, Arsalan [4 ]
机构
[1] Western Univ, Schulich Sch Med & Dent, London, ON, Canada
[2] Western Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, London, ON, Canada
[3] Florida Atlantic Univ, Coll Engn & Comp Sci, Boca Raton, FL 33431 USA
[4] Nova Southeastern Univ, Coll Dent Med, Dept Periodontol, Ft Lauderdale, FL 33314 USA
[5] Nova Southeastern Univ, Coll Dent Med, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, 3200 S Univ Dr, Davie, FL 33328 USA
关键词
Artificial intelligence; ChatGPT; dental board examination; dental education; dentistry; Integrated National Board Dental Examination;
D O I
10.1016/j.adaj.2023.07.016
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background. Although Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT) (OpenAI) may be an appealing educational resource for students, the chatbot responses can be subject to misinfor-mation. This study was designed to evaluate the performance of ChatGPT on a board-style mul-tiple-choice dental knowledge assessment to gauge its capacity to output accurate dental content and in turn the risk of misinformation associated with use of the chatbot as an educational resource by dental students.Methods. ChatGPT3.5 and ChatGPT4 were asked questions obtained from 3 different sources: INBDE Bootcamp, ITDOnline, and a list of board-style questions provided by the Joint Commis-sion on National Dental Examinations. Image-based questions were excluded, as ChatGPT only takes text-based inputs. The mean performance across 3 trials was reported for each model.Results. ChatGPT3.5 and ChatGPT4 answered 61.3% and 76.9% of the questions correctly on average, respectively. A 2-tailed t test was used to compare 2 independent sample means, and a 2-tailed c2 test was used to compare 2 sample proportions. A P value less than .05 was considered to be statistically significant.Conclusion. ChatGPT3.5 did not perform sufficiently well on the board-style knowledge assess-ment. ChatGPT4, however, displayed a competent ability to output accurate dental content. Future research should evaluate the proficiency of emerging models of ChatGPT in dentistry to assess its evolving role in dental education. Practical Implications. Although ChatGPT showed an impressive ability to output accurate dental content, our findings should encourage dental students to incorporate ChatGPT to sup-plement their existing learning program instead of using it as their primary learning resource.
引用
收藏
页码:970 / 974
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Views of health sciences undergraduates on ChatGPT, an artificial intelligence-powered language model: A qualitative study [J].
Yigit, Sedat ;
Berse, Soner ;
Dirgar, Ezgi ;
Guner, Secil Gulhan .
INNOVATIONS IN EDUCATION AND TEACHING INTERNATIONAL, 2024,
[32]   Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence, Including Large Language Models Such as ChatGPT, in Scientific Publications: Policies of KJR and Prominent Authorities [J].
Park, Seong Ho .
KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2023, 24 (08) :715-718
[33]   Success of ChatGPT, an AI language model, in taking the French language version of the European Board of Ophthalmology examination: A novel approach to medical knowledge assessment [J].
Panthier, C. ;
Gatinel, D. .
JOURNAL FRANCAIS D OPHTALMOLOGIE, 2023, 46 (07) :706-711
[34]   Does Artificial Intelligence Speak Our Language?: A Gadamerian Assessment of Generative Language Models [J].
Pinell, Phillip .
POLITICAL RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 2024, 77 (03) :713-728
[35]   Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging: Analyzing the Performance of ChatGPT and Microsoft Bing in Scoliosis Detection and Cobb Angle Assessment [J].
Fabijan, Artur ;
Zawadzka-Fabijan, Agnieszka ;
Fabijan, Robert ;
Zakrzewski, Krzysztof ;
Nowoslawska, Emilia ;
Polis, Bartosz .
DIAGNOSTICS, 2024, 14 (07)
[36]   Artificial Intelligence, the ChatGPT Large Language Model: Assessing the Accuracy of Responses to the Gynaecological Endoscopic Surgical Education and Assessment (GESEA) Level 1-2 knowledge tests [J].
Payone, M. ;
Palmieri, L. ;
Bizzarri, N. ;
Rosati, A. ;
Campolo, F. ;
Innocenzi, C. ;
Taliento, C. ;
Restaino, S. ;
Catena, U. ;
Vizzielli, G. ;
Akladios, C. ;
Ianieri, M. M. ;
Marescaux, J. ;
Campo, R. ;
Fanfani, F. ;
Scambia, G. .
FACTS VIEWS AND VISION IN OBGYN, 2024, 16 (04) :449-456
[37]   The Transparency of Science with ChatGPT and the Emerging Artificial Intelligence Language Models: Where Should Medical Journals Stand? [J].
Donato, Helena ;
Escada, Pedro ;
Villanueva, Tiago .
ACTA MEDICA PORTUGUESA, 2023, 36 (03) :147-148
[38]   Performance of large language artificial intelligence models on solving restorative dentistry and endodontics student assessments [J].
Kuenzle, Paul ;
Paris, Sebastian .
CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2024, 28 (11)
[39]   Artificial Intelligence Language Model Performance for Rapid Intraoperative Queries in Plastic Surgery: ChatGPT and the Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap [J].
Atkinson, Connor J. ;
Seth, Ishith ;
Xie, Yi ;
Ross, Richard J. ;
Hunter-Smith, David J. ;
Rozen, Warren M. ;
Cuomo, Roberto .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (03)
[40]   Comparitive performance of artificial intelligence-based large language models on the orthopedic in-training examination [J].
Xu, Andrew Y. ;
Singh, Manjot ;
Balmaceno-Criss, Mariah ;
Oh, Allison ;
Leigh, David ;
Daher, Mohammad ;
Alsoof, Daniel ;
Mcdonald, Christopher L. ;
Diebo, Bassel G. ;
Daniels, Alan H. .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2025, 33 (01)