A Safety Huddle Intervention in In-Patient Surgical Units: A Mixed-Methods Study

被引:2
作者
Lee, Seung Eun [1 ]
Dahinten, V. Susan [2 ]
Kim, Eunkyung [3 ,4 ]
Lee, Sang Hwa [3 ]
Han, Soo Young [5 ]
Kim, Phill Ja [5 ]
Kim, Jung Yeon [5 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Mo Im KIM Nursing Res Inst, Coll Nursing, Seoul 03722, South Korea
[2] Univ British Columbia, Sch Nursing, Vancouver, BC V6T 2B5, Canada
[3] Yonsei Univ, Coll Nursing, Seoul 03722, South Korea
[4] Yonsei Univ, Brain Korea 21 FOUR Project, Seoul 03722, South Korea
[5] Severance Hosp, Div Nursing, Seoul 03722, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
PATIENT SAFETY; PSYCHOLOGICAL SAFETY; VOICE; SPEAKING; IMPLEMENTATION; PERCEPTIONS; VALIDATION; TEAMWORK; CULTURE; STAFF;
D O I
10.1155/2023/8929993
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Open communication about patient safety concerns is necessary to enable a learning environment where lessons can be learned to improve patient safety, but nurses often hesitate to speak up even in situations where their patients may be at risk. One way to create a safe environment for speaking up is through the use of unit-level daily huddles. This study aimed to assess the effects of a 12-week huddle intervention on nine unit, nurse and patient care outcomes and describe nurses' experiences with the intervention. We used a single group, pre- and post-test mixed-methods design, with a dominant quantitative thread, and a final sample of 89 staff nurses. The intervention was conducted in four surgical units in a tertiary teaching hospital in Seoul, Korea. The intervention included two educational workshops for huddle leaders, two workshops for staff nurses, and 12-week huddles with coaching visits. We collected quantitative data on nine outcomes using online surveys before and after the intervention and qualitative data on nurse experiences of the intervention after the intervention. Paired t-tests were used for quantitative data analysis, and content analysis was used for qualitative data. We examined four unit-level outcomes (organizational learning, situation monitoring, mutual support, and speaking-up climate), three nurse-level outcomes (promotive and prohibitive voice behaviors and job satisfaction), and two patient care outcomes (patient safety and quality of care). Significant improvements were found in six of the nine outcomes. Findings from the qualitative data confirmed the benefits of the intervention but also identified challenges to huddle participation. Patient safety huddles can contribute to a learning environment by flattening hierarchies and encouraging nurses to speak up regarding safety issues. Leadership is a key in role modelling and creating the foundation for a more collaborative patient safety culture in healthcare organizations, for example, through the use of daily huddles.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   A human factors intervention in a hospital-evaluating the outcome of a TeamSTEPPS program in a surgical ward [J].
Aaberg, Oddveig Reiersdal ;
Hall-Lord, Marie Louise ;
Husebo, Sissel Iren Eikeland ;
Ballangrud, Randi .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2021, 21 (01)
[2]  
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), 2017, TEAMSTEPPS TEAMW PER
[3]  
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), 2017, DAIL HUDDL COMP KIT
[4]  
Agency for Healthcare Research and Qualtiy (AHRQ), 2021, NURS PAT SAF
[5]   Enhancing teamwork communication and patient safety responsiveness in a paediatric intensive care unit using the daily safety huddle tool [J].
Aldawood, Fatima ;
Kazzaz, Yasser ;
AlShehri, Ali ;
Alali, Hamza ;
Al-Surimi, Khaled .
BMJ OPEN QUALITY, 2020, 9 (01)
[6]   Speaking up about patient safety concerns: the influence of safety management approaches and climate on nurses' willingness to speak up [J].
Alingh, Carien W. ;
van Wijngaarden, Jeroen D. H. ;
van de Voorde, Karina ;
Paauwe, Jaap ;
Huijsman, Robbert .
BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2019, 28 (01) :39-48
[7]   The effects of power, leadership and psychological safety on resident event reporting [J].
Appelbaum, Nital P. ;
Dow, Alan ;
Mazmanian, Paul E. ;
Jundt, Dustin K. ;
Appelbaum, Eric N. .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2016, 50 (03) :343-350
[8]  
Arnold A, 2017, J MED RADIAT SCI, V64, P163, DOI 10.1002/jmrs.242
[9]  
Bengtsson M., 2016, NURSINGPLUS OPEN, V2, P8, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.NPLS.2016.01.001
[10]   A meta-analytic examination of the construct validity of the Michigan Organizational Assessment Questionnaire Job Satisfaction Subscale [J].
Bowling, Nathan A. ;
Hammond, Gregory D. .
JOURNAL OF VOCATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2008, 73 (01) :63-77