Validation of Blood Pressure Devices as per 2020 World Health Organization Technical Specifications: A Scoping Review of Global Literature

被引:2
作者
Murthy, Shruti [2 ]
Rajwar, Eti [3 ]
Johnson, Rosemol [3 ]
Shrivastava, Krati [3 ]
Kamath, Prashanthi [3 ]
Rahman, Rinsy [3 ]
Devaria, Abhinav [3 ]
Ismavel, Vijay Anand [3 ]
Vetter, Beatrice N. [6 ]
Jacob, Anil G. [3 ]
John, Oommen [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] George Inst Global Hlth, Jasola Dist Ctr, 308,Third Floor,Elegance Tower,Plot 8, New Delhi 110025, India
[2] George Inst Global Hlth, Hyderabad, Pakistan
[3] George Inst Global Hlth, New Delhi, India
[4] Univ New South Wales, George Inst Global Hlth, New Delhi, India
[5] Manipal Acad Higher Educ, Prasanna Sch Publ Hlth, Manipal, India
[6] FIND, Geneva, Switzerland
关键词
blood pressure; blood pressure monitors; review; review literature as topic; validation studies as topic; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION/EUROPEAN SOCIETY; HYPERTENSION-INTERNATIONAL-PROTOCOL; INDEPENDENT RISK-FACTOR; EUROPEAN-SOCIETY; HYPERTENSION/INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION; UNIVERSAL STANDARD; ADVANCEMENT; ASSOCIATION; ACCURACY; GUIDANCE;
D O I
10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.122.20425
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Background: To identify and summarize the global research literature on validation of automated noninvasive blood pressure measurement devices (BPMDs) with upper arm cuff, develop a repository of validated BPMDs in compliance with the 2020 World Health Organization technical specifications, and identify challenges and gaps in evidence base on validated BPMDs.Methods: A scoping review was conducted. Primary research validating BPMDs complying with the 2020 World Health Organization technical specifications (ie, semiautomated/automated noninvasive devices with upper arm cuff), published in English between January 2000 and December 2021, was included. We searched MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, ProQuest and the dabl website.Results: We included 269 studies validating 251 BPMDs across 89 manufacturers. Omron (29%), Microlife (10%), and A&D Company (8%) were the top 3 manufacturers. The 3 most frequently used validation protocols were the European Society of Hypertension-international protocol 2002 (27%), European Society of Hypertension-international protocol 2010 (25%), and modified British Hypertension Society protocol 1993 (16%), respectively. Nearly 45% of the validated BPMDs were intended for use in clinical settings, 38% were for home or self-measurement use, and 48% were for general adults. Most studies reported that BPMDs passed the validation criteria. There was inadequate reporting across studies, especially pertaining to validation settings.Conclusions: Most BPMDs fulfilled the validation criteria. However, there are considerable gaps in BPMD research in terms of geographical representation, including specific target populations and diseases/conditions, and a range of arm circumferences. Additionally, a potential strategy is required to accelerate the adoption of the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI)/European Society of Hypertension/International Organization for Standardization Universal Standard (International Organization for Standardization 81060-2:2018) for BPMD validation.
引用
收藏
页码:1110 / 1116
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2009, ISO10993-5 Tests for in Vitro Cytotoxicity
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1993, American national standard. Electronic or automated sphygmomanometers
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, 810602 ANSIAAMIISO
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2004, 10604 EN EUR COMM ST
[5]  
[Anonymous], PICO Portal.
[6]  
Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation, 2009, 8106022009 ANSIAAMII, P1
[7]  
Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation, 1987, NAT STAND EL AUT SPH
[8]   Accuracy of Blood Pressure Measurement Devices in Pregnancy A Systematic Review of Validation Studies [J].
Bello, Natalie A. ;
Woolley, Jonathan J. ;
Cleary, Kirsten Lawrence ;
Falzon, Louise ;
Alpert, Bruce S. ;
Oparil, Suzanne ;
Cutter, Gary ;
Wapner, Ronald ;
Muntner, Paul ;
Tita, Alan T. ;
Shimbo, Daichi .
HYPERTENSION, 2018, 71 (02) :326-335
[9]   Blood pressure measurement device selection in low-resource settings: Challenges, compromises, and routes to progress [J].
Brady, Tammy M. ;
Padwal, Raj ;
Blakeman, Drew E. ;
Farrell, Margaret ;
Frieden, Thomas R. ;
Kaur, Prabhdeep ;
Moran, Andrew E. ;
Jaffe, Marc G. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL HYPERTENSION, 2020, 22 (05) :792-801
[10]   History and Justification of a National Blood Pressure Measurement Validated Device Listing [J].
Cohen, Jordana B. ;
Padwal, Raj S. ;
Gutkin, Michael ;
Green, Beverly B. ;
Bloch, Michael J. ;
Germino, F. Wilford ;
Sica, Domenic A. ;
Viera, Anthony J. ;
Bluml, Benjamin M. ;
White, William B. ;
Taler, Sandra J. ;
Yarows, Steven ;
Shimbo, Daichi ;
Townsend, Raymond R. .
HYPERTENSION, 2019, 73 (02) :258-264