QTAR: A Q-learning-based topology-aware routing protocol for underwater wireless sensor networks*

被引:30
作者
Nandyala, Chandra Sukanya [1 ]
Kim, Hee-Won [2 ]
Cho, Ho-Shin [1 ]
机构
[1] Kyungpook Natl Univ, Sch Elect & Elect Engn, Daegu 41556, South Korea
[2] Def Agcy Technol & Qual, Jinju, South Korea
关键词
Q-learning; Routing; Reinforcement learning; Topology-aware; Underwater wireless sensor networks;
D O I
10.1016/j.comnet.2023.109562
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In this paper, an energy-efficient Q-learning-based routing protocol, called the Q-learning-based topology-aware routing (QTAR) protocol, is proposed for underwater wireless sensor networks. Unlike existing protocols, QTAR considers the network topology to determine the next-forwarder (NF) candidates along the routing path and adopts Q-learning to aid in the optimal global decision-making of an NF from the NF candidates. In addition, QTAR utilizes implicit cut-vertex recognition to optimize NF selection, alleviating the energy wastage that arises from forwarding data packets away from the sink. In our study, we evaluated the performance of QTAR by comparing it with the Q-learning-based energy-efficient and lifetime-aware routing protocol (QELAR), energy-efficient depth-based routing protocol (EEDBR), Q-learning-based delay-aware routing (QDAR), and reinforcement learning-based opportunistic routing protocol (RLOR) in terms of the energy consumption, latency, and network lifetime. Our results revealed that QTAR demonstrated the advantages of a lower energy consumption, shorter latency, and longer network lifetime in the percentage ranges of 26.08 to 70.12, 22.2 to 50, and 37.8 to 75, respectively, than QELAR, EEDBR, QDAR, and RLOR.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Abdul Karim O., 2018, EAI ENDORSED T ENERG, V5
[2]  
Abramson N., 1970, Proceedings of the 1970 fall joint computer conference, P281, DOI 10.1145/1478462.1478502
[3]  
Ahn G.S., 2006, Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems, P293
[4]  
Akyildiz I.F., 2006, UNDERWATER NETWORKS, P7, DOI DOI 10.1145/1161039.1161043
[5]   Wireless sensor networks: a survey [J].
Akyildiz, IF ;
Su, W ;
Sankarasubramaniam, Y ;
Cayirci, E .
COMPUTER NETWORKS, 2002, 38 (04) :393-422
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2021, MATLAB R2021B
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2022, 903 SERIES ATM 903
[8]   An efficient Dynamic Addressing based routing protocol for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks [J].
Ayaz, Muhammad ;
Abdullah, Azween ;
Faye, Ibrahima ;
Batira, Yasir .
COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS, 2012, 35 (04) :475-486
[9]   Harnessing HyDRO: Harvesting-aware Data ROuting for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks [J].
Basagni, Stefano ;
Di Valerio, Valerio ;
Gjanci, Petrika ;
Petrioli, Chiara .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 THE NINETEENTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON MOBILE AD HOC NETWORKING AND COMPUTING (MOBIHOC '18), 2018, :271-279
[10]  
Boyan J. A., 1994, P INT C NEUR INF PRO, P671