Robust multi-objective optimization of safety barriers performance parameters for NaTech scenarios risk assessment and management

被引:11
作者
Di Maio, Francesco [1 ]
Marchetti, Stefano [1 ]
Zio, Enrico [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Politecn Milan, Energy Dept, Via La Masa 34, I-20156 Milan, Italy
[2] PSL Res Univ, MINES ParisTech, CRC, Sophia Antipolis, France
关键词
Process safety; NaTech accidents; Safety barriers; Dynamic modeling; Robust Multi -Objective Optimization; NSGA-II; MODEA; MOPSO; MSSA; FIRE PROTECTION; ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.1016/j.ress.2023.109245
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Safety barriers are to be designed to bring the largest benefit in terms of accidental scenarios consequences mitigation at the most reasonable cost. In this paper, we formulate the problem of the identification of the optimal performance parameters of the barriers that can at the same time allow for the consequences mitigation of Natural Technological (NaTech) accidental scenarios at reasonable cost as a Multi-Objective Optimization (MOO) problem. The MOO is solved for a case study of literature, consisting in a chemical facility composed by three tanks filled with flammable substances and equipped with six safety barriers (active, passive and proce-dural), exposed to NaTech scenarios triggered by either severe floods or earthquakes. The performance of the barriers is evaluated by a phenomenological dynamic model that mimics the realistic response of the system. The uncertainty of the relevant parameters of the model (i.e., the response time of active and procedural barriers and the effectiveness of the barriers) is accounted for in the optimization, to provide robust solutions. Results for this case study suggest that the NaTech risk is optimally managed by improving the performances of four-out-of-six barriers (three active and one passive). Practical guidelines are provided to retrofit the safety barriers design.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Coello CAC, 2002, IEEE C EVOL COMPUTAT, P1051, DOI 10.1109/CEC.2002.1004388
  • [2] A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II
    Deb, K
    Pratap, A
    Agarwal, S
    Meyarivan, T
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2002, 6 (02) : 182 - 197
  • [3] Deb K., 2011, MULTIOBJECT EVOL OPT, P3, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-0-85729-652-8_1, 10.1007/978-0-85729-652-8_1]
  • [4] Introducing robustness in multi-objective optimization
    Deb, Kalyanmoy
    Gupta, Himanshu
    [J]. EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2006, 14 (04) : 463 - 494
  • [5] A framework of sensitivity analysis for the performance assessment of safety barriers impacted by NaTech accidents
    Di Maio, Francesco
    Marchetti, Stefano
    Zio, Enrico
    [J]. PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2023, 171 : 1022 - 1030
  • [6] A novel vulnerability model considering synergistic effect of fire and overpressure in chemical processing facilities
    Ding, Long
    Khan, Faisal
    Ji, Jie
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2022, 217
  • [7] Multi-objective optimisation for safe multi-floor process plant layout using the Dow's Fire & Explosion Index
    Ejeh, Jude O.
    Liu, Songsong
    Papageorgiou, Lazaros G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2022, 76
  • [8] Erik M., 2010, HL1001
  • [9] Ewan B.C.R., 2014, I CHEM ENG S SERIES
  • [10] Hamadi Y., 2013, EVOLUTIONARY ALGORIT, DOI [10.1007/978-3-642-21434-9, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-21434-9]