Interdisciplinary trainee networks to promote research on aging: Facilitators, barriers, and next steps

被引:1
|
作者
Harvey, Kelsey [1 ]
Sangrar, Ruheena [2 ]
Weldrick, Rachel [3 ]
Garnett, Anna [4 ]
Kalu, Michael [5 ]
Hatzifilalithis, Stephanie [6 ]
Patocs, Audrey [7 ]
Kajaks, Tara [5 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, MacPherson Inst Leadership Innovat & Excellence T, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Occupat Sci & Occupat Therapy, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Simon Fraser Univ, Dept Gerontol, Burnaby, BC, Canada
[4] Western Univ, Arthur Labatt Family Sch Nursing, London, ON, Canada
[5] McMaster Univ, Sch Rehabil Sci, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[6] McMaster Univ, Dept Hlth Aging & Soc, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[7] McMaster Univ, McMaster Inst Res Aging, Hamilton, ON, Canada
关键词
Aging; interdisciplinary; collaboration; trainee; network; research; non-formal education; FRAMEWORK; EDUCATION; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1080/02701960.2022.2088534
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Interdisciplinary education and research foster cross disciplinary collaboration. The study of age and aging is complex and needs to be carried out by scholars from myriad disciplines, making interdisciplinary collaboration paramount. Non-formal, extracurricular, and interdisciplinary networks are increasingly filling gaps in academia's largely siloed disciplinary training. This study examines the experiences of trainees (undergraduate, graduate, and post-graduate students) who belonged to one such network devoted to interdisciplinary approaches to education and research on aging. Fifty-three trainees completed the survey. Among respondents, some faculties (e.g., Health Sciences) were disproportionately represented over others (e.g., Business, Engineering, and Humanities). Most trainees valued their participation in the interdisciplinary network for research on aging. They also valued expanding their social and professional network, the nature of which was qualitatively described in open-text responses. We then relate our findings to three types of social capital: bonding; bridging; and linking. Finally, we conclude with recommendations for the intentional design and/or refinement of similar networks to maximize value to trainees, provide the skills necessary for interdisciplinary collaboration, and foster egalitarian and representative participation therein.
引用
收藏
页码:429 / 448
页数:20
相关论文
共 3 条
  • [1] Using participatory research to identify actionable facilitators and barriers to effective inpatient interdisciplinary communication
    Jenkins, Ashley M. M.
    Weber, Danielle E. E.
    Arfaa, Jennifer Jasmine E.
    Arken, Andrew
    Clark, Danielle L. L.
    Dobbs, Emily
    Lahbabi, Betina
    Myers, Kurt
    Tu, Jamie
    Clarke-Myers, Katherine
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 2023, 18 (02) : 130 - 138
  • [2] Barriers, facilitators and views about next steps to implementing supports for evidence-informed decision-making in health systems: a qualitative study
    Ellen, Moriah E.
    Leon, Gregory
    Bouchard, Gisele
    Ouimet, Mathieu
    Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
    Lavis, John N.
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2014, 9 : 179
  • [3] Implementing CAPABLE With Care Partners Through an Area Agency on Aging: Identifying Barriers and Facilitators Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research
    Toto, Pamela E.
    Alchin, Tucker
    Yanes, Caylee
    Park, Junha
    Fields, Beth E.
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2023, 63 (03) : 428 - 438