Evaluation of sex dimorphism of the mandible with geometric morphometric analysis: conventional and reconstructed panoramic radiography study

被引:2
作者
Sessiz, Ruya [1 ]
Ercan, Ilker [2 ]
Ozkan, Gokhan [3 ]
Toluk, Ozlem [2 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Canakkale Onsekiz Mart Univ, Dept Dentomaxillofacial Radiol, Fac Dent, Canakkale, Turkiye
[2] Bursa Uludag Univ, Dept Biostat, Fac Med, Bursa, Turkiye
[3] Aydin Adnan Menderes Univ, Dept Dentomaxillofacial Radiol, Fac Dent, Aydin, Turkiye
[4] Bezmialem Vakif Univ, Dept Biostat & Med Informat, Fac Med, Istanbul, Turkiye
[5] Bursa Uludag Univ, Inst Hlth Sci, Dept Biostat, Bursa, Turkiye
关键词
Cone beam computed tomography; Forensic anthropology; Geometric morphometrics; Mandible shape; Panoramic radiography; Sexual dimorphism;
D O I
10.1007/s00276-023-03201-z
中图分类号
R602 [外科病理学、解剖学]; R32 [人体形态学];
学科分类号
100101 ;
摘要
Purpose The purpose of the study was to investigate the mandible shape dimorphism between males and females both on conventional panoramic radiographs (cPR) and reconstructed panoramic radiographs obtained from cone beam computed tomography (rPR) with geometric morphometric method. Methods Panoramic radiographs and cone beam computed tomography scans were performed on 33 males and 35 females with median age 23.0 (13.0-57.0) years old. The mandibular shape comparisons between genders were examined with Procrustes analysis, mandible shape classification analysis was made with principal component analysis and shape deformations were concluded from thin plate spline (TPS) analysis. Results Age had no statistically significant difference between gender (p = 0.580). For the shape of mandible on cPR and rPR, there were statistically significant differences between males and females (p = 0.002, p = 0.032, respectively). The shape variabilities of mandible on cPR for females were 0.054 and for males 0.053. The shape variabilities of mandible on rPR for females were 0.051 and for males 0.049. Both on cPR and rPR, the shape variability of the females' mandible was similar within their group, the shape variability of the males' mandible was similar within their group. In the examination of mandibular dimorphism in cPR, maximal deformations were seen in the region between the mandibular notch, posterior ramus, anterior ramus, gonion, in both sides, in TPS graphs. On the other hand, a high level of deformations was observed in all landmarks that define the mandibular shape on rPR. Conclusions The mandible dimorphism can be detected in the examination performed with geometric morphometric methods on cPR and rPR. While mandible shape differences according to gender are seen most in the ramus region in cPR, differences can be detected in all landmarks in rRP.
引用
收藏
页码:1497 / 1504
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Abu Taleb NS, 2015, J FORENSIC RES, V6, P1
[2]   Sex determination using mandibular anthropometric parameters in subadult Iranian samples [J].
Akhlaghi, Mitra ;
Khalighi, Zahra ;
Vasigh, Shayesteh ;
Yousefinejad, Vahid .
JOURNAL OF FORENSIC AND LEGAL MEDICINE, 2014, 22 :150-153
[3]   Anthropometric analysis of mandible: an important step for sex determination [J].
Alias, Aspalilah ;
Ibrahim, Abdelnasser ;
Abu Bakar, Siti Noorain ;
Shafie, Mohamed Swarhib ;
Das, Srijit ;
Abdullah, Nurliza ;
Noor, Helmee Mohammad ;
Liao, Iman Yi ;
Nor, Faridah Mohd .
CLINICA TERAPEUTICA, 2018, 169 (05) :E217-E223
[4]   Linear measurement accuracy of CBCT panoramic reconstructions: experimental study with dry human mandibles [J].
Almeida, Viviane de Sousa Moreira ;
Bomfim, Rodrigo Tavares ;
Sobreira, Ana Cristina Rosario ;
Barbosa, Inessa da Silva ;
Leite-Ribeiro, Patricia Miranda ;
Rubira-Bullen, Izabel Regina ;
Sarmento, Viviane Almeida .
ORAL RADIOLOGY, 2021, 37 (03) :421-426
[5]  
Bhuyan Ruchi, 2018, J Oral Maxillofac Pathol, V22, P266, DOI 10.4103/jomfp.JOMFP_90_17
[6]   Object position and image magnification in dental panoramic radiography: a theoretical analysis [J].
Devlin, H. ;
Yuan, J. .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2013, 42 (01)
[7]  
Dimitrov DM, 2006, ASSESSMENT COUNSELOR
[8]  
Ercan I., 2008, Int. J. Tomogr. Stat, V9, P51
[9]  
Flores-Mir Carlos, 2014, Dental Press J. Orthod., V19, P45, DOI 10.1590/2176-9451.19.5.045-053.oar
[10]  
Franklin D, 2008, S AFR J SCI, V104, P101