Evidence accumulation modelling in the wild: understanding safety-critical decisions

被引:12
作者
Boag, Russell J. [1 ]
Strickland, Luke [2 ]
Heathcote, Andrew [4 ]
Neal, Andrew [3 ,5 ]
Palada, Hector [5 ]
Loft, Shayne [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Australia, Sch Psychol Sci, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
[2] Curtin Univ, Future Work Inst, Perth, WA 6000, Australia
[3] Univ Newcastle, Sch Psychol, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
[4] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Psychol, NL-1018 WS Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Univ Queensland, Sch Psychol, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
AIR-TRAFFIC-CONTROL; PROSPECTIVE MEMORY; CONFLICT DETECTION; COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE; DIFFUSION-MODEL; RESPONSE-TIMES; ONE-CHOICE; WORKLOAD; DRIVER; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.tics.2022.11.009
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Evidence accumulation models (EAMs) are a class of computational cognitive model used to understand the latent cognitive processes that underlie human decisions and response times (RTs). They have seen widespread application in cognitive psychology and neuroscience. However, historically, the application of these models was limited to simple decision tasks. Recently, researchers have applied these models to gain insight into the cognitive processes that underlie observed behaviour in applied domains, such as air-traffic control (ATC), driving, forensic and medical image discrimination, and maritime surveillance. Here, we discuss how this modelling approach helps researchers understand how the cognitive system adapts to task demands and interventions, such as task automation. We also discuss future directions and argue for wider adoption of cognitive modelling in Human Factors research.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 188
页数:14
相关论文
共 83 条
[1]  
Anderson J.R., 2014, ATOMIC COMPONENTS TH
[2]   The importance of age-related differences in prospective memory: Evidence from diffusion model analyses [J].
Ball, B. Hunter ;
Aschenbrenner, Andrew J. .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2018, 25 (03) :1114-1122
[3]   On the Pursuit of Multiple Goals With Different Deadlines [J].
Ballard, Timothy ;
Vancouver, Jeffrey B. ;
Neal, Andrew .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 103 (11) :1242-1264
[4]   Strategic attention and decision control support prospective memory in a complex dual-task environment [J].
Boag, Russell J. ;
Strickland, Luke ;
Loft, Shayne ;
Heathcote, Andrew .
COGNITION, 2019, 191
[5]   Cognitive Control and Capacity for Prospective Memory in Complex Dynamic Environments [J].
Boag, Russell James ;
Strickland, Luke ;
Heathcote, Andrew ;
Neal, Andrew ;
Loft, Shayne .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2019, 148 (12) :2181-2206
[6]   The neural basis of the speed-accuracy tradeoff [J].
Bogacz, Rafal ;
Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan ;
Forstmann, Birte U. ;
Nieuwenhuis, Sander .
TRENDS IN NEUROSCIENCES, 2010, 33 (01) :10-16
[7]   The variable nature of cognitive control: a dual mechanisms framework [J].
Braver, Todd S. .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2012, 16 (02) :106-113
[8]   The simplest complete model of choice response time: Linear ballistic accumulation [J].
Brown, Scott D. ;
Heathcote, Andrew .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 57 (03) :153-178
[9]  
Carver Charles S., 1998, On the Self-regulation of Behavior
[10]   Cognitive Workload Measurement and Modeling Under Divided Attention [J].
Castro, Spencer C. ;
Strayer, David L. ;
Matzke, Dora ;
Heathcote, Andrew .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2019, 45 (06) :826-839