Analysis of the curative effect and prognostic factors in patients with scapular fracture with surgical indications after conservative treatment: a case series and clinical outcomes

被引:2
作者
Chen, Xi [1 ,2 ]
Deng, Ya-Dian [3 ]
Qiu, Xu-Sheng [4 ]
Chen, Yi-Xin [1 ,4 ]
Zhang, Zi-Tao [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Chinese Med, Nanjing Drum Tower Hosp Clin Coll, Dept Orthoped Surg, Zhongshan Rd 321, Nanjing 210008, Peoples R China
[2] Orthoped Hosp Henan Prov, Dept Shoulder & Elbow Surg, Zhengzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Henan Tradit Chinese Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Emergency, Zhengzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Nanjing Univ, Med Sch, Affiliated Hosp, Nanjing Drum Tower Hosp,Dept Orthoped Surg, Nanjing 210008, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Scapular fracture; conservative treatment; surgical indications; fracture healing; shoulder function; CLASSIFICATION-SYSTEM FOCUS; GLENOID NECK; AO FOUNDATION; TRAUMA; BODY;
D O I
10.21037/qims-23-278
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: The choice of treatment for scapular fractures is a topic worth discussing. The type of scapular fracture is often complex, and more and more scholars prefer surgical treatment to obtain better shoulder joint function. In addition, because of the rich blood supply and muscles of the scapula, some scholars believe that simple suspension can also achieve satisfactory clinical effects. The aim of this study was to investigate the curative effect and prognostic factors of patients with scapular fracture with indications for surgery after receiving conservative treatment. Methods: Patients with scapular fracture who did not receive surgical treatment from July 2016 to May 2021 were recruited from the orthopedic trauma database of Nanjing Gulou Hospital, and the data from patients with indications for surgery were screened out for a retrospective analysis. The data were obtained from the database of orthopaedic trauma patients in Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital. The relevant data were recorded during telephone and video follow-up visits. Linear regression was used to analyze the factors associated with disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) score after receiving conservative treatment. Results: A total of 21 patients were included in the final statistical analysis. All patients were followed up for 31.0 +/- 20.3 (range, 6-63) months, aged 52.9 +/- 12.7 (range, 27-71) years. All fractures had clinical healing with a 100% recovery satisfaction rate. Outcome measures of efficacy [both DASH scores and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores], were correlated with whether the fracture involved the superior border of the scapular, were not associated with the following variables: age (P=0.18), Injury Severity Score (ISS) score (P=0.10), the glenopolar angle (GPA) value (P=0.76), superior shoulder suspensory complex (SSSC) injury (P=0.82), and glenoid fracture (P=0.84). The range of motion of the affected shoulder was significantly reduced compared to the healthy shoulder (P<0.01), but the range of forward flexion and elevation was not significantly different from that of the healthy shoulder (P>0.05). Patients with fractures not involving the superior border of the scapula had a much lower range of motion in the affected shoulder than in the healthy shoulder during abduction (P<0.05). Conclusions: The range of surgical indications for scapular fractures with scapular fractures involving the lower margin of the scapular can be appropriately narrowed. Some patients with scapular fracture who have surgical indications can regain satisfactory shoulder function after receiving conservative treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:5130 / 5140
页数:11
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] The relation between scapula fracture and the severity of trauma in blunt thoracic trauma
    Algan Kaya, Hatice
    Eroglu, Oguz
    Gunal, Nesimi
    Coskun, Figen
    Deniz, Turgut
    [J]. TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 48 (06) : 1228 - 1233
  • [2] The AO Foundation and Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) scapula fracture classification system: focus on body involvement
    Audige, Laurent
    Kellam, James F.
    Lambert, Simon
    Madsen, Jan Erik
    Babst, Reto
    Andermahr, Jonas
    Li, Wilson
    Jaeger, Martin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2014, 23 (02) : 189 - 196
  • [3] Scapular body fractures: results of operative treatment
    Bartonicek, Jan
    Fric, Vladimir
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2011, 35 (05) : 747 - 753
  • [4] Cole PA, 2021, EVIDENCE BASED ORTHO, P457
  • [5] Outcomes of Nonoperatively Treated Displaced Scapular Body Fractures
    Dimitroulias, Apostolos
    Molinero, Kenneth G.
    Krenk, Daniel E.
    Muffly, Matthew T.
    Altman, Daniel T.
    Altman, Gregory T.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2011, 469 (05) : 1459 - 1465
  • [6] How to deal with a glenoid fracture
    Frich, Lars Henrik
    Larsen, Morten Schultz
    [J]. EFORT OPEN REVIEWS, 2017, 2 (05): : 151 - 157
  • [7] The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire: longitudinal construct validity and measuring self-rated health change after surgery
    Gummesson, C
    Atroshi, I
    Ekdahl, C
    [J]. BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2003, 4 (1) : 1 - 6
  • [8] The AO Foundation and Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) scapula fracture classification system: focus on glenoid fossa involvement
    Jaeger, Martin
    Lambert, Simon
    Suedkamp, Norbert P.
    Kellam, James F.
    Madsen, Jan Erik
    Babst, Reto
    Andermahr, Jonas
    Li, Wilson
    Audige, Laurent
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2013, 22 (04) : 512 - 520
  • [9] Functional Outcome of Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Displaced Extra-Articular Scapula Fractures
    Jaikish, S.
    Sambandam, Balaji
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2021, 55 (03) : 708 - 713
  • [10] Modified Judet Approach and Minifragment Fixation of Scapular Body and Glenoid Neck Fractures
    Jones, Clifford B.
    Cornelius, Jondthan P.
    Sietsema, Debra L.
    Ringler, James R.
    Endres, Terrence J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2009, 23 (08) : 558 - 564