Multi-criteria Decision-Making Techniques for the Selection of Pareto-optimal Machine Learning Models in a Drinking-Water Quality Monitoring Problem

被引:1
|
作者
Henrique Alves Ribeiro, V. [1 ]
Reynoso-Meza, G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Pontifcia Univ Catolica Parana PUCPR, Programa Posgrad Engn Prod & Sistemas PPGEPS, Curitiba, Brazil
关键词
Multi-criteria decision making; multi-objective optimization; machine learning; water quality monitoring; fault detection; DIFFERENTIAL EVOLUTION; OPTIMIZATION; CLASSIFICATION; PROMETHEE;
D O I
10.1142/S0219622023500104
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Machine learning algorithms are valuable tools for solving a wide variety of complex engineering problems. Usually, those problems have multiple criteria to fulfill, but such machine learning-based solutions are usually optimized using a single criterion. In such instances, a multi-objective optimization-based approach could bring interesting solutions by determining a set of Pareto-optimal solutions with different trade-off. Therefore, a multi-criteria decision-making process must be carried out. To the authors' present knowledge, multi-criteria decision-making is yet to be fully explored for selecting preferable Pareto-optimal machine learning models after the training step. Therefore, this paper proposes applying and comparing five different multi-criteria decision-making techniques for selecting a preferred machine learning model. Additionally, an ensemble-based framework is proposed to cope with the difficulty of selecting parameters for such techniques. Those tools are tested on a complex real-world drinking-water quality monitoring problem. Results based on the F1 score indicate that via a multi-criteria decision-making process (F1=0.56), it is possible to select better solutions than single-criterion approaches (F1=0.55). Moreover, the proposed ensemble framework is able to mitigate the difficulty in defining preferences and regions of interest, achieving competitive solutions.
引用
收藏
页码:447 / 474
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Selection of optimal assembly strategy at an engine assembly plant using fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making tools
    Pattanaik L.N.
    Jena A.
    International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 2020, 36 (02) : 281 - 299
  • [42] Effect of normalization techniques in multi-criteria decision making methods for the design of ship internal layout from a Pareto optimal set
    H. Jafaryeganeh
    M. Ventura
    C. Guedes Soares
    Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2020, 62 : 1849 - 1863
  • [43] A Comprehensive Framework for Supplier Selection: Using Subjective, Objective, and Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Techniques With Sensitivity Analysis
    Boukrouh, Ikhlass
    Tayalati, Faouzi
    Azmani, Abdellah
    IEEE ACCESS, 2024, 12 : 145550 - 145569
  • [44] Optimal site selection of electrochemical energy storage station based on a novel grey multi-criteria decision-making framework
    Han, Zhi-Qiu
    Xu, Zi-Qiang
    Yang, Wu -E
    SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND ASSESSMENTS, 2024, 67
  • [45] Multi-criteria group decision-making method for optimal selection of sustainable industrial building options focused on petrochemical projects
    Heravi, Gholamreza
    Fathi, Medya
    Faeghi, Shiva
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 142 : 2999 - 3013
  • [46] Modification of the Water Quality Index (WQI) Process for Simple Calculation Using the Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) Method: A Review
    Akhtar, Naseem
    Ishak, Muhammad Izzuddin Syakir
    Ahmad, Mardiana Idayu
    Umar, Khalid
    Yusuff, Mohamad Shaiful Md
    Anees, Mohd Talha
    Qadir, Abdul
    Almanasir, Yazan Khalaf Ali
    WATER, 2021, 13 (07)
  • [47] Selection of sustainable juice extraction techniques for non-centrifugal sugar industry using multi-criteria decision-making methods
    Beeram, Sravya
    Srinivas, M.
    Raj, S. P.
    Reddy, K. S.
    JOURNAL OF FOOD PROCESS ENGINEERING, 2020, 43 (07)
  • [48] A comparison among fuzzy multi-criteria decision making, bivariate, multivariate and machine learning models in landslide susceptibility mapping
    Quoc Bao Pham
    Achour, Yacine
    Ali, Sk Ajim
    Parvin, Farhana
    Vojtek, Matej
    Vojtekova, Jana
    Al-Ansari, Nadhir
    Achu, A. L.
    Costache, Romulus
    Khedher, Khaled Mohamed
    Duong Tran Anh
    GEOMATICS NATURAL HAZARDS & RISK, 2021, 12 (01) : 1741 - 1777
  • [49] Optimal site selection for wind power plant using multi-criteria decision-making methods: A case study in eastern Iran
    Alavi, Seyed Mohammad Seyed
    Maleki, Akbar
    Khaleghi, Ali
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LOW-CARBON TECHNOLOGIES, 2022, 17 : 1319 - 1337
  • [50] Ranking based on optimal points and win-loss-draw multi-criteria decision-making with application to supplier evaluation problem
    Zakeri, Shervin
    Chatterjee, Prasenjit
    Cheikhrouhou, Naoufel
    Konstantas, Dimitri
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2022, 191