Comparison of specimen extraction site and another site for protective loop ileostomy in laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection: a retrospective comparative study

被引:4
|
作者
Liu, Chao [1 ]
Zhang, Jizhun [2 ]
Li, Leping [2 ]
Zhang, Li [2 ]
Shang, Liang [2 ]
Ma, Yan [2 ]
机构
[1] Shandong First Med Univ, Shandong Prov Hosp, Dept Laser Cosmet Clin, Jinan 250021, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong First Med Univ, Shandong Prov Hosp, Dept Gastrointestinal Surg, Jinan 250021, Shandong, Peoples R China
关键词
Rectal cancer; Laparoscopic low anterior resection; Protective loop ileostomy; Ileostomy position; Specimen extraction site; ANASTOMOTIC LEAKAGE; DEFUNCTIONING ILEOSTOMY; PERMANENT STOMA; OPEN SURGERY; RISK-FACTORS; CANCER; OUTCOMES; TRIAL; LIFE;
D O I
10.1007/s00423-023-02886-5
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundProtective loop ileostomy is commonly performed in laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection to prevent the serious complications of anastomotic fistula. It is usually created at the right lower quadrant of the abdomen and another wound is required for stoma. The study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of ileostomy at the specimen extraction site (SES) and another site (AS) beside the auxiliary incision.MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 101 eligible patients with pathologically diagnosed adenocarcinoma of the rectum from January 2020 to December 2021 in the study center. According to whether the ileostomy was at the specimen extraction site, patients were divided into SES group (40 patients) and AS group (61 patients). Clinicopathological characteristics, the intraoperative details, and postoperative outcomes of the two groups were measured.ResultsUnivariate analysis showed that the operative time was significantly shorter and the blood loss was significantly less in the SES group than in the AS group during laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection, the time to first flatus was significantly shorter, and the pain was significantly less in the SES group than in the AS group during ileostomy closure. The postoperative complications were similar in both groups. Multivariable analysis showed that ileostomy at the specimen extraction site was a significant factor influencing the operative time and blood loss of rectal resection, and influencing the pain and the time to first flatus during ileostomy closure.ConclusionCompared to ileostomy at AS, protective loop ileostomy at SES was time-saving and less bleeding during laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection, and more quick to first flatus and less pain during stoma closure, and did not lead to more postoperative complications. The median incision of the lower abdomen and the left lower abdominal incision were both good sites for ileostomy.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Efficacy of transanal tube for prevention of anastomotic leakage following laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancers: a retrospective cohort study in a single institution
    Eiji Hidaka
    Fumio Ishida
    Shumpei Mukai
    Kenta Nakahara
    Daisuke Takayanagi
    Chiyo Maeda
    Yusuke Takehara
    Jun-ichi Tanaka
    Shin-ei Kudo
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2015, 29 : 863 - 867
  • [42] Protective ileostomy after low anterior resection for extraperitoneal rectal cancer: does the reversal surgery timing affect closure failure?
    Batistotti, P.
    Montale, A.
    Bruzzone, M.
    Amato, A.
    Binda, G. A.
    UPDATES IN SURGERY, 2023, 75 (07) : 1811 - 1818
  • [43] A nomogram for predicting feasibility of laparoscopic anterior resection with trans-rectal specimen extraction (NOSES) in patients with upper rectal cancer
    Zhen-Yu Zhang
    Zhe Zhu
    Yuanyuan Zhang
    Li Ni
    Bing Lu
    BMC Surgery, 21
  • [44] A nomogram for predicting feasibility of laparoscopic anterior resection with trans-rectal specimen extraction (NOSES) in patients with upper rectal cancer
    Zhang, Zhen-Yu
    Zhu, Zhe
    Zhang, Yuanyuan
    Ni, Li
    Lu, Bing
    BMC SURGERY, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [45] Loop ostomy following laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
    Xin Wu
    Guole Lin
    Huizhong Qiu
    Yi Xiao
    Bin Wu
    Miner Zhong
    European Journal of Medical Research, 23
  • [46] Comparison of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and conventional laparoscopic-assisted resection in the treatment effects of low rectal cancer
    Zhu, Yihao
    Xiong, Huan
    Chen, Yinggang
    Liu, Zheng
    Jiang, Zheng
    Huang, Rui
    Gao, Feng
    Zhang, Qian
    Wang, Meng
    Jin, Yinghu
    Qiao, Tianyu
    Ma, Tianyi
    Hu, Hanqing
    Wang, Xishan
    Tang, Qingchao
    Wang, Guiyu
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [47] Who needs diverting ileostomy following laparoscopic low anterior resection in rectal cancer patients? Analysis of 417 patients in a single institute
    Hiroki Shimizu
    Shigeki Yamaguchi
    Toshimasa Ishii
    Hiroka Kondo
    Kiyoka Hara
    Kenichi Takemoto
    Shintaro Ishikawa
    Takuhisa Okada
    Asami Suzuki
    Isamu Koyama
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2020, 34 : 839 - 846
  • [48] Risk factors of symptomatic anastomotic leakage and its impacts on a long-term survival after laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a retrospective single-center study
    Qi, Xinyu
    Liu, Maoxing
    Xu, Kai
    Gao, Pin
    Tan, Fei
    Yao, Zhendan
    Zhang, Nan
    Yang, Hong
    Zhang, Chenghai
    Xing, Jiadi
    Cui, Ming
    Su, Xiangqian
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 19 (01)
  • [49] Totally Laparoscopic Resection for Low Sigmoid and Rectal Cancer Using Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Techniques
    Shimizu, Hideharu
    Adachi, Kensuke
    Ohtsuka, Hideo
    Osaka, Itaru
    Takuma, Kunio
    Takanishi, Kijuro
    Matsumoto, Jun
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2017, 27 (04) : E74 - E79
  • [50] Development of a machine learning algorithm to predict complications of total laparoscopic anterior resection and natural orifice specimen extraction surgery in rectal cancer
    Wei, Ran
    Guan, Xu
    Liu, Enrui
    Zhang, Weiyuan
    Lv, Jingfang
    Huang, Haiyang
    Zhao, Zhixun
    Chen, Haipeng
    Liu, Zheng
    Jiang, Zheng
    Wang, Xishan
    EJSO, 2023, 49 (07): : 1258 - 1268