Comparison of specimen extraction site and another site for protective loop ileostomy in laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection: a retrospective comparative study

被引:4
|
作者
Liu, Chao [1 ]
Zhang, Jizhun [2 ]
Li, Leping [2 ]
Zhang, Li [2 ]
Shang, Liang [2 ]
Ma, Yan [2 ]
机构
[1] Shandong First Med Univ, Shandong Prov Hosp, Dept Laser Cosmet Clin, Jinan 250021, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong First Med Univ, Shandong Prov Hosp, Dept Gastrointestinal Surg, Jinan 250021, Shandong, Peoples R China
关键词
Rectal cancer; Laparoscopic low anterior resection; Protective loop ileostomy; Ileostomy position; Specimen extraction site; ANASTOMOTIC LEAKAGE; DEFUNCTIONING ILEOSTOMY; PERMANENT STOMA; OPEN SURGERY; RISK-FACTORS; CANCER; OUTCOMES; TRIAL; LIFE;
D O I
10.1007/s00423-023-02886-5
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundProtective loop ileostomy is commonly performed in laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection to prevent the serious complications of anastomotic fistula. It is usually created at the right lower quadrant of the abdomen and another wound is required for stoma. The study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of ileostomy at the specimen extraction site (SES) and another site (AS) beside the auxiliary incision.MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 101 eligible patients with pathologically diagnosed adenocarcinoma of the rectum from January 2020 to December 2021 in the study center. According to whether the ileostomy was at the specimen extraction site, patients were divided into SES group (40 patients) and AS group (61 patients). Clinicopathological characteristics, the intraoperative details, and postoperative outcomes of the two groups were measured.ResultsUnivariate analysis showed that the operative time was significantly shorter and the blood loss was significantly less in the SES group than in the AS group during laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection, the time to first flatus was significantly shorter, and the pain was significantly less in the SES group than in the AS group during ileostomy closure. The postoperative complications were similar in both groups. Multivariable analysis showed that ileostomy at the specimen extraction site was a significant factor influencing the operative time and blood loss of rectal resection, and influencing the pain and the time to first flatus during ileostomy closure.ConclusionCompared to ileostomy at AS, protective loop ileostomy at SES was time-saving and less bleeding during laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection, and more quick to first flatus and less pain during stoma closure, and did not lead to more postoperative complications. The median incision of the lower abdomen and the left lower abdominal incision were both good sites for ileostomy.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Surgical Management by Disk Excision or Rectal Resection of Low Rectal Endometriosis and Risk of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome: A Retrospective Comparative Study
    Farella, Marilena
    Tuech, Jean-Jacques
    Bridoux, Valerie
    Coget, Julien
    Chati, Rachid
    Resch, Benoit
    Marpeau, Loic
    Roman, Horace
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 28 (12) : 2013 - 2024
  • [32] Comparative study between ghost ileostomy and defunctioning ileostomy in terms of morbidity and cost-effectiveness in low anterior resection for rectal cancer
    Serkan Zenger
    Bulent Gurbuz
    Ugur Can
    Emre Balik
    Tunc Yalti
    Dursun Bugra
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 2021, 406 : 339 - 347
  • [33] Comparison of symptomatic anastomotic leakage following laparoscopic and open low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis of 1014 consecutive patients
    Katsuno, Hidetoshi
    Shiomi, Akio
    Ito, Masaaki
    Koide, Yoshikazu
    Maeda, Koutarou
    Yatsuoka, Toshimasa
    Hase, Kazuo
    Komori, Koji
    Minami, Kazuhito
    Sakamoto, Kazuhiro
    Saida, Yoshihisa
    Saito, Norio
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2016, 30 (07): : 2848 - 2856
  • [34] Use of a nomogram to predict the closure rate of diverting ileostomy after low anterior resection: A retrospective cohort study
    Abe, Shinya
    Kawai, Kazushige
    Nozawa, Hiroaki
    Hata, Keisuke
    Kiyomatsu, Tomomichi
    Tanaka, Toshiaki
    Nishikawa, Takeshi
    Otani, Kensuke
    Sasaki, Kazuhito
    Kaneko, Manabu
    Murono, Koji
    Emoto, Shigenobu
    Watanabe, Toshiaki
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 47 : 83 - 88
  • [35] Diverting Stoma Versus No Diversion in Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection: A Single-center Retrospective Study in Japan
    Wang, Liming
    Hirano, Yasumitsu
    Ishii, Toshimasa
    Kondo, Hiroka
    Hara, Kiyoka
    Obara, Nao
    Tan, Pauleon
    Yamaguchi, Shigeki
    IN VIVO, 2019, 33 (06): : 2125 - 2131
  • [36] Comparison between robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and traditional laparoscopic low anterior resection for middle and low rectal cancer: A propensity score matching analysis
    Feng, Qingyang
    Ng, Simon S. M.
    Zhang, Zhiyuan
    Lin, Songbin
    Niu, Zhengchuan
    Wei, Ye
    He, Guodong
    Chang, Wenju
    Zhu, Dexiang
    Xu, Jianmin
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 124 (04) : 607 - 618
  • [37] Meta-analysis of laparoscopic anterior resection with natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE-LAR) versus abdominal incision specimen extraction (AISE-LAR) for sigmoid or rectal tumors
    He, Jun
    Yao, Hai-Bo
    Wang, Chang-Jian
    Yang, Qin-Yan
    Qiu, Jian-Ming
    Chen, Jin-Ming
    Shen, Zhong
    Yang, Guan-Gen
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 18 (01)
  • [38] Risk factors of stoma re-creation after closure of diverting ileostomy in patients with rectal cancer who underwent low anterior resection or intersphincteric resection with loop ileostomy
    Song, Ook
    Kim, Kyung Hwan
    Lee, Soo Young
    Kim, Chang Hyun
    Kim, Young Jin
    Kim, Hyeong Rok
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL TREATMENT AND RESEARCH, 2018, 94 (04) : 203 - 208
  • [39] Does the timing of protective ileostomy closure post-low anterior resection have an impact on the outcome? A retrospective study
    Sauri, Fozan
    Sakr, Ahmad
    Kim, Ho Seung
    Alessa, Mohammed
    Torky, Radwan
    Zakarneh, Eman
    Yang, Seung Yoon
    Kim, Nam Kyu
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 44 (01) : 374 - 379
  • [40] Comparison of hand-sewn anterior repair, resection and hand-sewn anastomosis, resection and stapled anastomosis techniques for the reversal of diverting loop ileostomy after low anterior rectal resection: a randomized clinical trial
    Yazd, Seyed Mostafa Meshkati
    Shahriarirad, Reza
    Keramati, Mohammad Reza
    Fallahi, Mehdi
    Nourmohammadi, Soheila-sadat
    Kazemeini, Alireza
    Fazeli, Mohammad Sadegh
    Keshvari, Amir
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2024, 28 (01)