Comparison of specimen extraction site and another site for protective loop ileostomy in laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection: a retrospective comparative study

被引:4
|
作者
Liu, Chao [1 ]
Zhang, Jizhun [2 ]
Li, Leping [2 ]
Zhang, Li [2 ]
Shang, Liang [2 ]
Ma, Yan [2 ]
机构
[1] Shandong First Med Univ, Shandong Prov Hosp, Dept Laser Cosmet Clin, Jinan 250021, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong First Med Univ, Shandong Prov Hosp, Dept Gastrointestinal Surg, Jinan 250021, Shandong, Peoples R China
关键词
Rectal cancer; Laparoscopic low anterior resection; Protective loop ileostomy; Ileostomy position; Specimen extraction site; ANASTOMOTIC LEAKAGE; DEFUNCTIONING ILEOSTOMY; PERMANENT STOMA; OPEN SURGERY; RISK-FACTORS; CANCER; OUTCOMES; TRIAL; LIFE;
D O I
10.1007/s00423-023-02886-5
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundProtective loop ileostomy is commonly performed in laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection to prevent the serious complications of anastomotic fistula. It is usually created at the right lower quadrant of the abdomen and another wound is required for stoma. The study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of ileostomy at the specimen extraction site (SES) and another site (AS) beside the auxiliary incision.MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 101 eligible patients with pathologically diagnosed adenocarcinoma of the rectum from January 2020 to December 2021 in the study center. According to whether the ileostomy was at the specimen extraction site, patients were divided into SES group (40 patients) and AS group (61 patients). Clinicopathological characteristics, the intraoperative details, and postoperative outcomes of the two groups were measured.ResultsUnivariate analysis showed that the operative time was significantly shorter and the blood loss was significantly less in the SES group than in the AS group during laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection, the time to first flatus was significantly shorter, and the pain was significantly less in the SES group than in the AS group during ileostomy closure. The postoperative complications were similar in both groups. Multivariable analysis showed that ileostomy at the specimen extraction site was a significant factor influencing the operative time and blood loss of rectal resection, and influencing the pain and the time to first flatus during ileostomy closure.ConclusionCompared to ileostomy at AS, protective loop ileostomy at SES was time-saving and less bleeding during laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection, and more quick to first flatus and less pain during stoma closure, and did not lead to more postoperative complications. The median incision of the lower abdomen and the left lower abdominal incision were both good sites for ileostomy.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Integration of prolapsing technique and one-stitch method of ileostomy during laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a retrospective study
    Li, Xiangmin
    Tian, Min
    Chen, Jingbo
    Liu, Yulin
    Tian, Hu
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2023, 10
  • [22] The safety of early versus late ileostomy reversal after low anterior rectal resection: a retrospective study in 47 patients
    Fukudome, Ian
    Maeda, Hiromichi
    Okamoto, Ken
    Kuroiwa, Hajime
    Yamaguchi, Sachi
    Fujisawa, Kazune
    Shiga, Mai
    Dabanaka, Ken
    Kobayashi, Michiya
    Namikawa, Tsutomu
    Hanazaki, Kazuhiro
    PATIENT SAFETY IN SURGERY, 2021, 15 (01)
  • [23] Efficacy of transanal tube for prevention of anastomotic leakage following laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancers: a retrospective cohort study in a single institution
    Hidaka, Eiji
    Ishida, Fumio
    Mukai, Shumpei
    Nakahara, Kenta
    Takayanagi, Daisuke
    Maeda, Chiyo
    Takehara, Yusuke
    Tanaka, Jun-ichi
    Kudo, Shin-ei
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2015, 29 (04): : 863 - 867
  • [24] Interventions to reduce dehydration related to defunctioning loop ileostomy after low anterior resection in rectal cancer: a prospective cohort study
    Munshi, Eihab
    Bengtsson, Eva
    Blomberg, Karin
    Syk, Ingvar
    Buchwald, Pamela
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 90 (09) : 1627 - 1631
  • [25] The association of age with decline in renal function after low anterior resection and loop ileostomy for rectal cancer: a retrospective cohort prognostic factor study
    Rhemouga, Amal
    Buettner, Stefan
    Bechstein, Wolf O.
    Woeste, Guido
    Schreckenbach, Teresa
    BMC GERIATRICS, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [26] A comparison of the long-term anorectal function between laparoscopic intersphincteric resection and low anterior resection for low rectal cancer
    Kawada, Kenji
    Hida, Koya
    Hasegawa, Suguru
    Sakai, Yoshiharu
    SURGERY TODAY, 2018, 48 (10) : 921 - 927
  • [27] The association of age with decline in renal function after low anterior resection and loop ileostomy for rectal cancer: a retrospective cohort prognostic factor study
    Amal Rhemouga
    Stefan Buettner
    Wolf O. Bechstein
    Guido Woeste
    Teresa Schreckenbach
    BMC Geriatrics, 21
  • [28] Loop ostomy following laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
    Wu, Xin
    Lin, Guole
    Qiu, Huizhong
    Xiao, Yi
    Wu, Bin
    Zhong, Miner
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2018, 23
  • [29] Intracorporeal reinforcement with barbed suture is associated with low anastomotic leakage rates after laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a retrospective study
    Haiping Lin
    Minhao Yu
    Guangyao Ye
    Shaolan Qin
    Hongsheng Fang
    Ran Jing
    Tingyue Gong
    Yang Luo
    Ming Zhong
    BMC Surgery, 22
  • [30] Comparative short-term and survival outcomes of three specimen extraction techniques in laparoscopic low rectal cancer surgery: does it affect ileostomy closure?
    Chen, Haipeng
    Huang, Fei
    Yang, Ming
    Zhao, Zhixun
    Guan, Xu
    Liu, Zheng
    Jiang, Zheng
    Liu, Qian
    Zheng, Zhaoxu
    Wang, Xishan
    BMC SURGERY, 2023, 23 (01)