Comparison of specimen extraction site and another site for protective loop ileostomy in laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection: a retrospective comparative study

被引:4
|
作者
Liu, Chao [1 ]
Zhang, Jizhun [2 ]
Li, Leping [2 ]
Zhang, Li [2 ]
Shang, Liang [2 ]
Ma, Yan [2 ]
机构
[1] Shandong First Med Univ, Shandong Prov Hosp, Dept Laser Cosmet Clin, Jinan 250021, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong First Med Univ, Shandong Prov Hosp, Dept Gastrointestinal Surg, Jinan 250021, Shandong, Peoples R China
关键词
Rectal cancer; Laparoscopic low anterior resection; Protective loop ileostomy; Ileostomy position; Specimen extraction site; ANASTOMOTIC LEAKAGE; DEFUNCTIONING ILEOSTOMY; PERMANENT STOMA; OPEN SURGERY; RISK-FACTORS; CANCER; OUTCOMES; TRIAL; LIFE;
D O I
10.1007/s00423-023-02886-5
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundProtective loop ileostomy is commonly performed in laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection to prevent the serious complications of anastomotic fistula. It is usually created at the right lower quadrant of the abdomen and another wound is required for stoma. The study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of ileostomy at the specimen extraction site (SES) and another site (AS) beside the auxiliary incision.MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 101 eligible patients with pathologically diagnosed adenocarcinoma of the rectum from January 2020 to December 2021 in the study center. According to whether the ileostomy was at the specimen extraction site, patients were divided into SES group (40 patients) and AS group (61 patients). Clinicopathological characteristics, the intraoperative details, and postoperative outcomes of the two groups were measured.ResultsUnivariate analysis showed that the operative time was significantly shorter and the blood loss was significantly less in the SES group than in the AS group during laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection, the time to first flatus was significantly shorter, and the pain was significantly less in the SES group than in the AS group during ileostomy closure. The postoperative complications were similar in both groups. Multivariable analysis showed that ileostomy at the specimen extraction site was a significant factor influencing the operative time and blood loss of rectal resection, and influencing the pain and the time to first flatus during ileostomy closure.ConclusionCompared to ileostomy at AS, protective loop ileostomy at SES was time-saving and less bleeding during laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection, and more quick to first flatus and less pain during stoma closure, and did not lead to more postoperative complications. The median incision of the lower abdomen and the left lower abdominal incision were both good sites for ileostomy.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of specimen extraction site and another site for protective loop ileostomy in laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection: a retrospective comparative study
    Chao Liu
    Jizhun Zhang
    Leping Li
    Li Zhang
    Liang Shang
    Yan Ma
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 408
  • [2] One-stitch versus traditional method of protective loop ileostomy in laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection: A retrospective comparative study
    Chen, Yuezhi
    Pei, Wenting
    Wang, Qiang
    Wang, Wenchen
    Xu, Tao
    Jing, Changqing
    Li, Leping
    Zhang, Jizhun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 80 : 117 - 123
  • [3] Left-Sided Ileostomy at Specimen Extraction Site in Laparoscopic-Assisted Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer
    Yoo, Sang Bum
    Jeong, Seung-Yong
    Lim, Seok-Byung
    Park, Ji Won
    Choi, Hyo Seong
    Oh, Jae Hwan
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2013, 23 (01): : 22 - 25
  • [4] 'Dumpling suture method' versus traditional suture method of protective loop ileostomy in laparoscopic anterior rectal resection with specimen extraction through stoma incision: a retrospective comparative cohort study
    Gu, Jiani
    Wang, Jin
    Hu, Xingwang
    Ding, Wenjun
    Cui, Long
    Du, Peng
    Liang, Zhonglin
    Wu, Tingyu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 110 (03) : 1367 - 1375
  • [5] Safety of temporary ileostomy via specimen extraction site in rectal cancer patients who underwent laparoscopic low anterior resection
    Lee, Kil-yong
    Park, Ji Won
    Lee, Ki-young
    Cho, Sangsik
    Kwon, Yoon-Hye
    Kim, Min Jung
    Ryoo, Seung-Bum
    Jeong, Seung-Yong
    Park, Kyu Joo
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)
  • [6] Which site is better for prophylactic ileostomy after laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery? By the specimen extraction site or new site: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zheng, Bobo
    Wang, Quan
    Wei, Mingtian
    Yue, Yumin
    Li, Xiaojun
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 13
  • [7] Does temporary ileostomy via specimen extraction site affect the short outcomes and complications after laparoscopic low anterior resection in rectal cancer patients? A propensity score matching analysis
    Peng, Dong
    Yu, Dong-Ling
    Liu, Xiao-Yu
    Tao, Wei
    Kang, Bing
    Zhang, Hua
    Wei, Zheng-Qiang
    Ji, Guang-Yan
    BMC SURGERY, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [8] Does temporary ileostomy via specimen extraction site affect the short outcomes and complications after laparoscopic low anterior resection in rectal cancer patients? A propensity score matching analysis
    Dong Peng
    Dong-Ling Yu
    Xiao-Yu Liu
    Wei Tao
    Bing Kang
    Hua Zhang
    Zheng-Qiang Wei
    Guang-Yan Ji
    BMC Surgery, 22
  • [9] Comparative study between transanal tube and loop ileostomy in low anterior resection for mid rectal cancer: a retrospective single center trial
    Kim, Min-Ki
    Won, Dae-Youn
    Lee, Jin-Kwon
    Kang, Won-Kyung
    Kim, Jun-Gi
    Oh, Seong Taek
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL TREATMENT AND RESEARCH, 2015, 88 (05) : 260 - 268
  • [10] Comparison of safety of loop ileostomy and loop transverse colostomy for low-lying rectal cancer patients undergoing anterior resection: A retrospective, single institute, propensity score-matched study
    Sun, Xiyu
    Han, Huiqiao
    Qiu, Huizhong
    Wu, Bin
    Lin, Guole
    Niu, Beizhan
    Zhou, Jiaolin
    Lu, Junyang
    Xu, Lai
    Zhang, Guannan
    Xiao, Yi
    JOURNAL OF BUON, 2019, 24 (01): : 123 - 129