Robotic-assisted pyeloplasty in children: a systematic review of the literature

被引:12
作者
Esposito, Ciro [1 ]
Cerulo, Mariapina [1 ]
Lepore, Benedetta [1 ]
Coppola, Vincenzo [1 ]
D'Auria, Daniela [2 ]
Esposito, Giorgia [3 ]
Carulli, Roberto [1 ]
Del Conte, Fulvia [1 ]
Escolino, Maria [1 ]
机构
[1] Federico II Univ Naples, Dept Translat Med Sci DISMET, Pediat Surg Unit, Sch Med, Via S Pansini 5, I-80131 Naples, Italy
[2] Free Univ Bolzano, Fac Comp Sci, Bolzano, Italy
[3] Univ Naples Federico II, Internal Med Unit, Naples, Italy
关键词
Pediatric urology; UPJO; Robotic pyeloplasty; URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION; LAPAROSCOPIC PYELOPLASTY; LEARNING-CURVE; NATIONAL TRENDS; SURGERY; OUTCOMES; COST; EXPERIENCE; STANDARD; INFANTS;
D O I
10.1007/s11701-023-01559-1
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Robotic pyeloplasty has become a natural progression from the development of open, then laparoscopic procedures to treat pediatric patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). Robotic-assisted pyeloplasty (RALP) is now considered a new gold standard in pediatric MIS. A systematic review of the literature retrieved from PubMed and published in the last 10 years (2012-2022) was performed. This review underlines that in all children except the smallest infants, where the open procedure has benefits in terms of duration of general anesthetic and there are limitations in the size of instruments, robotic pyeloplasty is becoming the preferred procedure to perform in patients with UPJO. Results for the robotic approach are extremely promising, with shorter operative times than laparoscopy and equal success rates, length of stay and complications. In case of redo pyeloplasty, RALP is easier to perform than other open or MIS procedures. By 2009, robotic surgery became the most used modality to treat all UPJO and continues to grow in popularity. Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children is safe and effective with excellent outcomes, even in redo pyeloplasty or challenging anatomical cases. Moreover, robotic approach shortens the learning curve for junior surgeons, who can readily achieve levels of expertise comparable to senior practitioners. However, there are still concerns regarding the cost associated with this procedure. Further high-quality prospective observational studies and clinical trials, as well as new technologies specific for the pediatric population, are advisable for RALP to reach the level of gold standard.
引用
收藏
页码:1239 / 1246
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Outcomes of robotic-assisted pyeloplasty in symptomatic versus asymptomatic patients
    Razavi, Sarah
    Babbin, Josh
    Dahl, Douglas M. M.
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 41 (07) : 1959 - 1965
  • [22] Robotic-assisted microsurgery in andrology: a systematic review
    Douroumis, Konstantinos
    Spartalis, Eleftherios
    Stravodimos, Konstantinos
    Levis, Panagiotis K.
    Tsourouflis, Gerasimos
    Dimitroulis, Dimitrios
    Nikiteas, Nikolaos, I
    [J]. ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2023, 25 (04) : 454 - 461
  • [23] Robotic-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review
    Kordan, Yakup
    Canda, Abdullah Erdem
    Koseoglu, Ersin
    Balbay, Derya
    Laguna, M. Pilar
    de la Rosette, Jean
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (06) : 1 - 15
  • [24] Robotic-assisted parathyroidectomy and short-term outcomes: a systematic review of the literature
    Paspala, A.
    Spartalis, E.
    Nastos, C.
    Tsourouflis, G.
    Dimitroulis, D.
    Pikoulis, E.
    Nikiteas, N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2020, 14 (06) : 821 - 827
  • [25] Robotic-assisted hepatic resection: a systematic review
    Pelletier, Jean-Sebastien
    Gill, Richdeep S.
    Shi, Xinzhe
    Birch, Daniel W.
    Karmali, Shahzeer
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2013, 9 (03) : 262 - 267
  • [26] Robotic-assisted bariatric surgery: a systematic review
    Gill, Richdeep S.
    Al-Adra, David P.
    Birch, Daniel
    Hudson, Matthew
    Shi, Xinzhe
    Sharma, Arya M.
    Karmali, Shahzeer
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2011, 7 (03) : 249 - 255
  • [27] Is secondary robotic pyeloplasty safe and effective as primary robotic pyeloplasty? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Dirie, Najib Isse
    Ahmed, Mahad A.
    Wang, Shaogang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2020, 14 (02) : 241 - 248
  • [28] Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Han, Caiwen
    Shan, Xinyi
    Yao, Liang
    Yan, Peijing
    Li, Meixuan
    Hu, Lidong
    Tian, Hongwei
    Jing, Wutang
    Du, Binbin
    Wang, Lixia
    Yang, Kehu
    Guo, Tiankang
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 32 (11): : 4377 - 4392
  • [29] Pyeloplasty in children: perioperative results and long-term outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery compared to open surgery
    Salo, Martin
    Altemani, Tania Sjoberg
    Anderberg, Magnus
    [J]. PEDIATRIC SURGERY INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 32 (06) : 599 - 607
  • [30] Current Concepts in Pediatric Robotic Assisted Pyeloplasty
    Morales-Lopez, Ramphis A.
    Perez-Marchan, Marcos
    Brayfield, Marcos Perez
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PEDIATRICS, 2019, 7