Robotic-assisted pyeloplasty in children: a systematic review of the literature

被引:16
作者
Esposito, Ciro [1 ]
Cerulo, Mariapina [1 ]
Lepore, Benedetta [1 ]
Coppola, Vincenzo [1 ]
D'Auria, Daniela [2 ]
Esposito, Giorgia [3 ]
Carulli, Roberto [1 ]
Del Conte, Fulvia [1 ]
Escolino, Maria [1 ]
机构
[1] Federico II Univ Naples, Dept Translat Med Sci DISMET, Pediat Surg Unit, Sch Med, Via S Pansini 5, I-80131 Naples, Italy
[2] Free Univ Bolzano, Fac Comp Sci, Bolzano, Italy
[3] Univ Naples Federico II, Internal Med Unit, Naples, Italy
关键词
Pediatric urology; UPJO; Robotic pyeloplasty; URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION; LAPAROSCOPIC PYELOPLASTY; LEARNING-CURVE; NATIONAL TRENDS; SURGERY; OUTCOMES; COST; EXPERIENCE; STANDARD; INFANTS;
D O I
10.1007/s11701-023-01559-1
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Robotic pyeloplasty has become a natural progression from the development of open, then laparoscopic procedures to treat pediatric patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). Robotic-assisted pyeloplasty (RALP) is now considered a new gold standard in pediatric MIS. A systematic review of the literature retrieved from PubMed and published in the last 10 years (2012-2022) was performed. This review underlines that in all children except the smallest infants, where the open procedure has benefits in terms of duration of general anesthetic and there are limitations in the size of instruments, robotic pyeloplasty is becoming the preferred procedure to perform in patients with UPJO. Results for the robotic approach are extremely promising, with shorter operative times than laparoscopy and equal success rates, length of stay and complications. In case of redo pyeloplasty, RALP is easier to perform than other open or MIS procedures. By 2009, robotic surgery became the most used modality to treat all UPJO and continues to grow in popularity. Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children is safe and effective with excellent outcomes, even in redo pyeloplasty or challenging anatomical cases. Moreover, robotic approach shortens the learning curve for junior surgeons, who can readily achieve levels of expertise comparable to senior practitioners. However, there are still concerns regarding the cost associated with this procedure. Further high-quality prospective observational studies and clinical trials, as well as new technologies specific for the pediatric population, are advisable for RALP to reach the level of gold standard.
引用
收藏
页码:1239 / 1246
页数:8
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]   Laparoscopic and robotic pyeloplasty as minimally invasive alternatives to the open approach for the treatment of uretero-pelvic junction obstruction in infants: a multi-institutional comparison of outcomes and learning curves [J].
Andolfi, C. ;
Lombardo, A. M. ;
Aizen, J. ;
Recabal, X. ;
Walker, J. P. ;
Barashi, N. S. ;
Reed, F. ;
Lopez, P. J. ;
Wilcox, D. T. ;
Gundeti, M. S. .
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 40 (04) :1049-1056
[2]   Failed pyeloplasty in children: Is robot-assisted laparoscopic reoperative repair feasible? [J].
Asensio, Marino ;
Gander, Romy ;
Royo, Gloria F. ;
Lloret, Josep .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2015, 11 (02) :69.e1-69.e6
[3]   Robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children [J].
Atug, F ;
Woods, M ;
Burgess, SV ;
Castle, EP ;
Thomas, R .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 174 (04) :1440-1442
[4]   Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: Multi-institutional experience in infants [J].
Avery, Daniel I. ;
Herbst, Katherine W. ;
Lendvay, Thomas S. ;
Noh, Paul H. ;
Dangle, Pankaj ;
Gundeti, Mohan S. ;
Steele, Matthew C. ;
Corbett, Sean T. ;
Peters, Craig A. ;
Kim, Christina .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2015, 11 (03) :139.e1-139.e5
[5]   Quantifying the Additional Difficulty of Pediatric Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Re-Do Pyeloplasty: A Comparison of Primary and Re-Do Procedures [J].
Baek, Minki ;
Silay, Mesrur Selcuk ;
Au, Jason K. ;
Huang, Gene O. ;
Elizondo, Rodolfo A. ;
Puttmann, Kathleen ;
Janzen, Nicolette K. ;
Seth, Abhishek ;
Roth, David R. ;
Koh, Chester J. .
JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 28 (05) :610-616
[6]   Robotic Management of Urolithiasis in the Pediatric Population [J].
Ballesteros, Natalia ;
Snow, Zachary A. ;
Moscardi, Paulo R. M. ;
Ransford, George A. ;
Gomez, Pablo ;
Castellan, Miguel .
FRONTIERS IN PEDIATRICS, 2019, 7
[7]   A comparison of robotic surgery in children weighing above and below 15.0 kg: size does not affect surgery success [J].
Ballouhey, Quentin ;
Villemagne, Thierry ;
Cros, Jerome ;
Szwarc, Caroline ;
Braik, Karim ;
Longis, Bernard ;
Lardy, Hubert ;
Fourcade, Laurent .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2015, 29 (09) :2643-2650
[8]   Infant robotic pyeloplasty: Comparison with an open cohort [J].
Bansal, D. ;
Cost, N. G. ;
DeFoor, W. R., Jr. ;
Reddy, P. P. ;
Minevich, E. A. ;
Vanderbrink, B. A. ;
Alam, S. ;
Sheldon, C. A. ;
Noh, P. H. .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2014, 10 (02) :380-385
[9]   Validated cost comparison of open vs. robotic pyeloplasty in American children’s hospitals [J].
Bennett W.E., Jr. ;
Whittam B.M. ;
Szymanski K.M. ;
Rink R.C. ;
Cain M.P. ;
Carroll A.E. .
Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2017, 11 (2) :201-206
[10]   Transperitoneal Versus Retroperitoneal Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Children. A Multicentre, Prospective Study [J].
Blanc, Thomas ;
Abbo, Olivier ;
Vatta, Fabrizio ;
Grosman, Julien ;
Marquant, Fabienne ;
Elie, Caroline ;
Juricic, Melodie ;
Laraqui, Samia ;
Broch, Aline ;
Arnaud, Alexis .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2022, 41 :134-140