A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model for Selecting the Best Project Delivery Systems for Offsite Construction Projects

被引:9
作者
Assaf, Mohamed [1 ]
Hussein, Mohamed [2 ,3 ]
Abdelkhalek, Sherif [4 ]
Zayed, Tarek [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3, Canada
[2] Assiut Univ, Fac Engn, Civil Engn Dept, Assiut 71511, Egypt
[3] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Bldg & Real Estate, Hong Kong 999077, Peoples R China
[4] Tanta Univ, Fac Engn, Struct Engn Dept, Tanta 31527, Egypt
关键词
off-site construction; project delivery systems; multi-criteria decision making; analytic network process; evidential reasoning; BARRIERS; INDEX; COST;
D O I
10.3390/buildings13020571
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Off-site construction (OSC) is an innovative construction method that transfers most of the site-based work to a more controlled environment. Construction waste minimization, speedy schedules, higher sustainability, and better quality are some of the perceived benefits of OSC. Therefore, significant research attention has been given to OSC. However, minimal research attention has been given to procurement management in OSC, which could impact its pace of adoption. Existing studies on the procurement methods of OSC projects have overlooked several criteria related to OSC that impact the selection of the appropriate procurement methods (i.e., design-build, construction management, etc.). In addition, the literature lacks decision-making tools to assist OSC practitioners in selecting the appropriate procurement method. In this regard, this study contributes to the body of knowledge by (1) identifying the criteria that impact the selection of OSC procurement methods; (2) developing a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) model to select the appropriate OSC procurement methods. The developed MCDM model uses a hybrid approach of analytic network process (ANP) and evidential reasoning (ER). The ANP, which considers the interdependencies among the collected OSC procurement criteria, is used to calculate the relative importance weights through questionnaire surveys. The ER method evaluates various OSC procurement methods in accordance with the criteria importance weights. The results indicate that project quality, cost control, and funding arrangement are the prominent selection factors. On the other hand, the model reveals that the integrated project delivery (IPD) and construction management (CM) methods have the highest utility scores. The MCDM model has been validated by comparing the results with similar studies. The present study could assist OSC practitioners in selecting the appropriate procurement method for OSC projects.
引用
收藏
页数:35
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach for Selecting Wind Energy Power Plant Locations [J].
Rehman, Ateekh Ur ;
Abidi, Mustufa Haider ;
Umer, Usama ;
Usmani, Yusuf Siraj .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (21)
[22]   Multi-criteria decision making entropy model for project portfolio selection [J].
Wang, Zhaohong ;
Zhan, Wei .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RISK MANAGEMENT & GLOBAL E-BUSINESS, VOLS I AND II, 2009, :1033-1037
[23]   Using multi-criteria decision-making methods to select the best location for the construction of a biomass power plant in Iran [J].
Shahraki Shahdabadi, Reza ;
Maleki, Akbar ;
Haghighat, S. ;
Ghalandari, Mohammad .
JOURNAL OF THERMAL ANALYSIS AND CALORIMETRY, 2021, 145 (04) :2105-2122
[24]   Using multi-criteria decision-making methods to select the best location for the construction of a biomass power plant in Iran [J].
Reza Shahraki Shahdabadi ;
Akbar Maleki ;
S. Haghighat ;
Mohammad Ghalandari .
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 2021, 145 :2105-2122
[25]   Development of a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making model to assist building designers in the choice of superficial construction systems in urban areas [J].
Duerr, Jonas ;
Geissler, Achim ;
Hoffmann, Caroline .
JOURNAL OF BUILDING PHYSICS, 2023, 46 (05) :513-540
[26]   The Dialectical Systems Theory's Capacity for Multi-Criteria Decision-Making [J].
Cancer, Vesna ;
Mulej, Matjaz .
SYSTEMS RESEARCH AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 2010, 27 (03) :285-300
[27]   Multi-criteria decision-making for sustainable metropolitan cities assessment [J].
Carli, Raffaele ;
Dotoli, Mariagrazia ;
Pellegrino, Roberta .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 226 :46-61
[28]   Using multi-criteria decision making for selecting picking strategies [J].
Hernandez, Liseth Contreras ;
Jimenez G., Hanser S. ;
Dantas, Priscilla P. L. ;
Cavalcante, Cristiano A. V. .
OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2022, 22 (04) :3265-3290
[29]   Using multi-criteria decision making for selecting picking strategies [J].
Liseth Contreras Hernandez ;
Hanser S. Jiménez G. ;
Priscilla P. L. Dantas ;
Cristiano A. V. Cavalcante .
Operational Research, 2022, 22 :3265-3290
[30]   Multi-criteria decision-making applied to the sustainability of building structures based on Modern Methods of Construction [J].
Sanchez-Garrido, Antonio J. ;
Navarro, Ignacio J. ;
Yepes, Victor .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 330