Variation in quality of care by medical institute level in China: a systematic review protocol

被引:0
作者
Wang, Quan [1 ,2 ]
Tu, Xi [3 ,4 ]
Fu, Yaqun [1 ]
Zhang, Jiawei [1 ]
Wei, Xia [5 ]
Zhu, Zheng [1 ]
Wang, Ting [6 ]
Yang, Li [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ Hlth Sci Ctr, Sch Publ Hlth, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Washington Univ St Louis, Brown Sch, St Louis, MO USA
[3] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Sch Hlth Policy & Management, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Peking Union Med Coll, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Dept Hlth Serv Res & Policy, London, England
[6] Shandong Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Jinan, Shandong, Peoples R China
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2023年 / 13卷 / 01期
关键词
Quality in health care; PRIMARY CARE; Health & safety; PRIMARY-HEALTH-CARE; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067683
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IntroductionQuality variation has been widely witnessed and discussed in China. However, limited evidence reveals quality gaps by the medical institute level, especially between hospitals and primary care institutes. This systematic review will synthesise the available evidence on quality variation between medical institutes at different levels in China. By adopting a quality framework, we will also explore the detailed domains (structure, process and outcomes) and dimensions (safety, effectiveness, timeliness, patient-centredness, efficiency, integration and equity) of quality gaps.Methods and analysisAn extensive literature search will be conducted on eight key electronic databases: MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus, EMBASE, ProQuest, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and WANFANG database. The Grey Matter Checklist will be used to screen relevant grey literature. The publication time limit should be before 31 December 2022 when we plan to conduct a literature search. All kinds of studies that revealed the quality difference between medical institutes at different levels will be included, no matter if quality improvement intervention is involved. All quality measures and indicators will be recorded and sorted into appropriate domains and dimensions. For those studies that took the completion rate of standard operations to assess the quality, we will also record the name of the clinical pathways, guidelines or checklists used. Two reviewers will independently perform the study selection, data extraction and quality assessment process. A narrative or quantitative synthesis will be performed based on the available data.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval is not applicable. The results of this study will be submitted to a widely accepted peer-review journal. The findings will also be used to inform administration about quality gaps by different medical institute levels and, therefore, help them to design policies that will minimise the quality variation.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42022345933.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Bellagio Declaration on high-quality health systems: from a quality moment to a quality movement
    Al-Janabi, Annegret
    Al-Wahdani, Batool
    Ammar, Walid
    Arsenault, Catherine
    Asiedu, Ernest Konadu
    Etiebet, Mary-Ann
    Forde, Ian
    Gage, Anna D.
    Garcia-Saiso, Sebastian
    Guanais, Frederico
    Hansen, Peter M.
    Hovig, Dana
    Jhalani, Manoj
    Kruk, Margaret E.
    Maliqi, Blerta
    Marikar, Kadar
    Matsoso, Malebona Precious
    Pate, Muhammad
    Peterson, Stefan
    Roder-DeWan, Sanam
    Schulze, Alexander
    Somers, Kate
    Shiozaki, Yasuhisa
    Thapa, Gagan
    [J]. LANCET GLOBAL HEALTH, 2018, 6 (11): : E1144 - E1145
  • [2] Expansion of the quality of care index on breast cancer and its risk factors using the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019
    Azadnajafabad, Sina
    Moghaddam, Sahar Saeedi
    Keykhaei, Mohammad
    Shobeiri, Parnian
    Rezaei, Negar
    Ghasemi, Erfan
    Mohammadi, Esmaeil
    Ahmadi, Naser
    Ghamari, Azin
    Shahin, Sarvenaz
    Rezaei, Nazila
    Aghili, Mahdi
    Kaviani, Ahmad
    Larijani, Bagher
    Farzadfar, Farshad
    [J]. CANCER MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (02): : 1729 - 1743
  • [3] A systematic review of quality measures used in primary care dentistry
    Byrne, Matthew J.
    Tickle, Martin
    Glenny, Anne-Marie
    Campbell, Stephen
    Goodwin, Tom
    O'Malley, Lucy
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL DENTAL JOURNAL, 2019, 69 (04) : 252 - 264
  • [4] Canadian Agency for drug and techonologies in Health (CADTH) Ottawa Ontario Canada, GREY MATT PRACT TOOL
  • [5] Committee on Quality of HealthCarein America, 2001, CROSSING QUALITY CHA
  • [6] Consumers RR, 2019, COCHRANE CONSUMERS C
  • [7] People In Sub-Saharan Africa Rate Their Health And Health Care Among The Lowest In The World
    Deaton, Angus S.
    Tortora, Robert
    [J]. HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2015, 34 (03) : 519 - 527
  • [8] THE QUALITY OF CARE - HOW CAN IT BE ASSESSED
    DONABEDIAN, A
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1988, 260 (12): : 1743 - 1748
  • [9] Differences in regional distribution and inequality in health-resource allocation at hospital and primary health centre levels: a longitudinal study in Shanghai, China
    Dong, Enhong
    Liu, Shipeng
    Chen, Minjie
    Wang, Hongmei
    Chen, Li-Wu
    Xu, Ting
    Wang, Tao
    Zhang, Lufa
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (07):
  • [10] How could health care be anything other than high quality?
    Ghebreyesus, Tedros Adhanom
    [J]. LANCET GLOBAL HEALTH, 2018, 6 (11): : E1140 - E1141