Equity implications of electric bikesharing in Philadelphia

被引:13
作者
Caspi, Or [1 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers Univ Edward J Bloustein Sch Planning & Pu, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA
关键词
Micromobility; Bikesharing; E-bikes; Bicycle Transportation; Transportation Equity; BICYCLE-SHARING SYSTEM; BUILT ENVIRONMENT; EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS; BIKE SHARE; USAGE; INEQUALITIES; WASHINGTON; DEMAND; CHOICE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s10708-022-10698-1
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Bikesharing is an affordable mode of transportation and a potential tool to reduce car usage in cities. However, in many cities, bikesharing seems to be used mostly by affluent populations. Indego, Philadelphia's bikeshare, embraced the promotion of equity as part of its primary goals. While previous measures were not adequate for that cause, Indego decided to integrate e-bikes into its system to promote usage among current non-users. In this study, I examine how the integration of e-bikes influences Indego's usage in disadvantaged areas. For that purpose, I combined official publicly available data using spatial analysis methods. Furthermore, I used random forest and spatial negative binomial regression to examine factors associated with shared bicycle and e-bike usage in Philadelphia. The findings show that e-bikes increase the overall usage of Indego, specifically in disadvantaged areas. In these regions, the users use shared e-bikes for commute, leisure, and other utilitarian purposes, while in the rest of the city, users use e-bikes mainly for commuting. I conclude that the integration of e-bikes was successful in promoting bikesharing usage in disadvantaged areas.
引用
收藏
页码:1559 / 1617
页数:59
相关论文
共 77 条
  • [1] Dynamics of bike sharing in Washington, DC and Brisbane, Australia: Implications for policy and planning
    Ahillen, Michael
    Mateo-Babiano, Derlie
    Corcoran, Jonathan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORTATION, 2016, 10 (05) : 441 - 454
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2014, BIKEMAD
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2019, OPENSTREETMAP
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2012, Capital Bikeshare 2011 Member Survey Report
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2018, US
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2012, TRB 2012 ANN M
  • [7] Anzilotti E., 2019, MADISON IS 1 CITY GO
  • [8] Exploring gendered cycling behaviours within a large-scale behavioural data-set
    Beecham, Roger
    Wood, Jo
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 37 (01) : 83 - 97
  • [9] Knowing about a public bicycle share program in Montreal, Canada: Are diffusion of innovation and proximity enough for equitable awareness?
    Bernatchez, Annie C.
    Gauvin, Lise
    Fuller, Daniel
    Dube, Anne Sophie
    Drouin, Louis
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT & HEALTH, 2015, 2 (03) : 360 - 368
  • [10] Community mobility MAUP-ing: A socio-spatial investigation of bikeshare demand in Chicago
    Biehl, Alec
    Ermagun, Alireza
    Stathopoulos, Amanda
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 66 : 80 - 90