A Redesign Decision Model for Large-Scale Complex Sustainment-Dominated Systems

被引:3
作者
Classi, Cal C. [1 ,2 ]
Nowicki, David R. [3 ]
Dickens, John M. [4 ]
Glassburner, Aaron, V [4 ]
机构
[1] Stevens Inst Technol, Hoboken, NJ 07030 USA
[2] Northrop Grumman, Orlando, FL 32826 USA
[3] Univ North Texas, Denton, TX 76203 USA
[4] Air Force Inst Technol, Wright Patterson AFB, OH 45433 USA
关键词
Mathematical model; Aging; Decision making; Systems thinking; Surface acoustic waves; Linguistics; Planning; Fuzzy; multiattribute decision-making method; sustainment dominated systems; systems thinking; technology refresh planning (TRP); TECHNOLOGY INSERTION; OBSOLESCENCE; REPLACEMENT; SELECTION; COST; ART;
D O I
10.1109/TEM.2021.3092962
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This article presents a fuzzy, multiattribute decision-making method to assist managers in making more informed technology refresh planning decisions; especially when evaluating large-scale complex sustainment-dominated systems. These types of systems have inherently long operational lives, thereby incurring multiple technology design refreshes throughout their extensive lifecycles. Strategically planning for these technology refreshes presents a significant engineering, business, and logistical challenge. Existing refresh planning models are limited as they do not consider a systems' view when forming recommendations, which can lead to suboptimal decisions. The mathematical models developed in this article are the foundation of the fuzzy, multiattribute decision-making method that allows engineering managers to use a systems' thinking approach to evaluate competing technology refresh options. When applied to multidisciplinary projects, the fuzzy, multiattribute decision-making method evaluates several competing and complementary redesign drivers, leading to more informed systems refresh recommendations.
引用
收藏
页码:3410 / 3420
页数:11
相关论文
共 65 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1972, Academy of Management Journal, DOI [DOI 10.2307/255139, 10.2307/255139]
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2004, INT J ADV MANUF SYST
  • [3] Ashby WR, 1956, An Introduction to Cybernetics
  • [4] Boardman J, 2008, IND INNOV SER, P1
  • [5] An Alternative FMEA Method for Simple and Accurate Ranking of Failure Modes
    Bradley, James R.
    Guerrero, Hector H.
    [J]. DECISION SCIENCES, 2011, 42 (03) : 743 - 771
  • [6] A new method selection approach for fuzzy group multicriteria decision making
    Chang, Yu-Hern
    Yeh, Chung-Hsing
    Chang, Yu-Wei
    [J]. APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2013, 13 (04) : 2179 - 2187
  • [7] A Strategic Technology Planning Framework: A Case of Taiwan's Semiconductor Foundry Industry
    Chen, Hongyi
    Ho, Jonathan C.
    Kocaoglu, Dundar F.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2009, 56 (01) : 4 - 15
  • [8] A fuzzy simple additive weighting system under group decision-making for facility location selection with objective/subjective attributes
    Chou, Shuo-Yan
    Chang, Yao-Hui
    Shen, Chun-Ying
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2008, 189 (01) : 132 - 145
  • [9] A Systems Thinking Approach to Managing Sustainment Phase Redesign Planning
    Classi, Cal C.
    Nowicki, David R.
    Mansouri, Mo
    Sauser, Brian J.
    Randall, Wesley S.
    [J]. ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2018, 30 (01) : 68 - 81
  • [10] Fly-by-wire flight control
    Collinson, RPG
    [J]. COMPUTING & CONTROL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 1999, 10 (04): : 141 - 152