A Deep Learning Decision Support Tool to Improve Risk Stratification and Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies in BI-RADS 4 Mammograms

被引:3
作者
Ezeana, Chika F. [1 ]
He, Tiancheng [1 ]
Patel, Tejal A. [3 ]
Kaklamani, Virginia [6 ]
Elmi, Maryam [6 ]
Brigmon, Erika [6 ]
Otto, Pamela M. [6 ]
Kist, Kenneth A. [6 ]
Speck, Heather [7 ]
Wang, Lin [1 ]
Ensor, Joe [2 ]
Shih, Ya-Chen T. [4 ]
Kim, Bumyang [4 ]
Pan, I. -Wen [4 ]
Cohen, Adam L. [8 ]
Kelley, Kristen [8 ]
Spak, David [5 ]
Yang, Wei T. [5 ]
Chang, Jenny C. [2 ]
Wong, Stephen T. C. [1 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Houston Methodist Hosp, Houston Methodist Neal Canc Ctr, Dept Syst Med & Bioengn, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Houston Methodist Hosp, Houston Methodist Neal Canc Ctr, Houston, TX USA
[3] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Gen Oncol, Houston, TX USA
[4] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Hlth Serv Res, Houston, TX USA
[5] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, Houston, TX USA
[6] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr, San Antonio, TX USA
[7] Univ Incarnate Word, Sch Osteopath Med, San Antonio, TX USA
[8] Univ Utah, Huntsman Canc Inst, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[9] Houston Methodist Hosp, Dept Radiol, Weill Cornell Med, 6670 Bertner Ave, Houston, TX 77030 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
POSITIVE PREDICTIVE-VALUE; OCCULT BREAST-LESIONS; CANCER; WOMEN; VARIABILITY; CATEGORIES; ACCURACY; DENSITY;
D O I
10.1148/ryai.220259
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the performance of a biopsy decision support algorithmic model, the intelligent-augmented breast cancer risk calculator (iBRISK), on a multicenter patient dataset. Materials and Methods: iBRISK was previously developed by applying deep learning to clinical risk factors and mammographic descriptors from 9700 patient records at the primary institution and validated using another 1078 patients. All patients were seen from March 2006 to December 2016. In this multicenter study, iBRISK was further assessed on an independent, retrospective dataset (January 2015-June 2019) from three major health care institutions in Texas, with Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 4 lesions. Data were dichotomized and trichotomized to measure precision in risk stratification and probability of malignancy (POM) estimation. iBRISK score was also evaluated as a continuous predictor of malignancy, and cost savings analysis was performed. Results: The iBRISK model's accuracy was 89.5%, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.92, 0.95), sensitivity was 100%, and specificity was 81%. A total of 4209 women (median age, 56 years [IQR, 45-65 years]) were included in the multicenter dataset. Only two of 1228 patients (0.16%) in the "low" POM group had malignant lesions, while in the "high" POM group, the malignancy rate was 85.9%. iBRISK score as a continuous predictor of malignancy yielded an AUC of 0.97 (95% CI: 0.97, 0.98). Estimated potential cost savings were more than $420 million. Conclusion: iBRISK demonstrated high sensitivity in the malignancy prediction of BI-RADS 4 lesions. iBRISK may safely obviate biop-sies in up to 50% of patients in low or moderate POM groups and reduce biopsy-associated costs.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Predicting Breast Cancer by Applying Deep Learning to Linked Health Records and Mammograms [J].
Akselrod-Ballin, Ayelet ;
Chorev, Michal ;
Shoshan, Yoel ;
Spiro, Adam ;
Hazan, Alon ;
Melamed, Roie ;
Barkan, Ella ;
Herzel, Esma ;
Naor, Shaked ;
Karavani, Ehud ;
Koren, Gideon ;
Goldscbmidt, Yaara ;
Shalev, Varda ;
Rosen-Zvi, Michal ;
Guindy, Michal .
RADIOLOGY, 2019, 292 (02) :331-342
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Obstet Gynecol, V118, P372, DOI 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31822c98e5
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, SAS Software
[4]   The Positive Predictive Value of BI-RADS Microcalcification Descriptors and Final Assessment Categories [J].
Bent, Chris K. ;
Bassett, Lawrence W. ;
D'Orsi, Carl J. ;
Sayre, James W. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 194 (05) :1378-1383
[5]  
Bruening W, Comparative Effectiveness of Core-Needle and Open Surgical Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Breast Lesions
[6]   Deep Learning Pre-training Strategy for Mammogram Image Classification: an Evaluation Study [J].
Clancy, Kadie ;
Aboutalib, Sarah ;
Mohamed, Aly ;
Sumkin, Jules ;
Wu, Shandong .
JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 2020, 33 (05) :1257-1265
[7]   Improving the Prediction of Benign or Malignant Breast Masses Using a Combination of Image Biomarkers and Clinical Parameters [J].
Cui, Yanhua ;
Li, Yun ;
Xing, Dong ;
Bai, Tong ;
Dong, Jiwen ;
Zhu, Jian .
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
[8]   The Clinically Relevant Breast Imaging Audit [J].
D'Orsi, Carl Joseph .
JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING, 2020, 2 (01) :2-6
[9]  
Dahabreh IJ., 2014, Core Needle and Open Surgical Biopsy for Diagnosis of Breast Lesions: An Update to the 2009 Report. edn
[10]   COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER 2 OR MORE CORRELATED RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES - A NONPARAMETRIC APPROACH [J].
DELONG, ER ;
DELONG, DM ;
CLARKEPEARSON, DI .
BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (03) :837-845