Machine learning prediction models for diabetic kidney disease: systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Chen, Lianqin [1 ,2 ]
Shao, Xian [1 ,2 ]
Yu, Pei [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Med Univ, Chu Hsien I Mem Hosp, NHC Key Lab Hormones & Dev, Tianjin Key Lab Metab Dis, Tianjin 300134, Peoples R China
[2] Tianjin Med Univ, Tianjin Inst Endocrinol, Tianjin 300134, Peoples R China
关键词
Machine learning; Diabetic kidney disease; Prediction model; Prognostic model; Meta-analysis; GLOMERULAR-FILTRATION-RATE; RISK; VALIDATION; NEPHROPATHY; PROGRESSION; MELLITUS; NOMOGRAM;
D O I
10.1007/s12020-023-03637-8
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Machine learning is increasingly recognized as a viable approach for identifying risk factors associated with diabetic kidney disease (DKD). However, the current state of real-world research lacks a comprehensive systematic analysis of the predictive performance of machine learning (ML) models for DKD.Objectives The objectives of this study were to systematically summarize the predictive capabilities of various ML methods in forecasting the onset and the advancement of DKD, and to provide a basic outline for ML methods in DKD.Methods We have searched mainstream databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and MEDLINE databases to obtain the eligible studies. Subsequently, we categorized various ML techniques and analyzed the differences in their performance in predicting DKD.Results Logistic regression (LR) was the prevailing ML method, yielding an overall pooled area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.83. On the other hand, the non-LR models also performed well with an overall pooled AUROC of 0.80. Our t-tests showed no statistically significant difference in predicting ability between LR and non-LR models (t = 1.6767, p > 0.05).Conclusion All ML predicting models yielded relatively satisfied DKD predicting ability with their AUROCs greater than 0.7. However, we found no evidence that non-LR models outperformed the LR model. LR exhibits high performance or accuracy in practice, while it is known for algorithmic simplicity and computational efficiency compared to others. Thus, LR may be considered a cost-effective ML model in practice.
引用
收藏
页码:890 / 902
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Machine Learning-Based Prediction Models for Delirium: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Xie, Qi
    Wang, Xinglei
    Pei, Juhong
    Wu, Yinping
    Guo, Qiang
    Su, Yujie
    Yan, Hui
    Nan, Ruiling
    Chen, Haixia
    Dou, Xinman
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION, 2022, 23 (10) : 1655 - +
  • [2] 69 A systematic review and meta-analysis of machine learning models in the prediction of adverse outcomes in peripheral arterial disease
    Ravindhran, Bharadhwaj
    Ubhi, Laila
    Nazir, Shahani
    Pymer, Sean
    Smith, George
    Carradice, Daniel
    Torgerson, David
    Mitchell, Alex
    Chetter, Ian
    BJS-BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2025, 112
  • [3] Machine learning-based prediction models for pressure injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Pei, Juhong
    Guo, Xiaojing
    Tao, Hongxia
    Wei, Yuting
    Zhang, Hongyan
    Ma, Yuxia
    Han, Lin
    INTERNATIONAL WOUND JOURNAL, 2023, 20 (10) : 4328 - 4339
  • [4] Prediction of hypertension using traditional regression and machine learning models: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chowdhury, Mohammad Ziaul Islam
    Naeem, Iffat
    Quan, Hude
    Leung, Alexander A.
    Sikdar, Khokan C.
    O'Beirne, Maeve
    Turin, Tanvir C.
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (04):
  • [5] Machine learning-based models for prediction of survival in medulloblastoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hajikarimloo, Bardia
    Habibi, Mohammad Amin
    Alvani, Mohammadamin Sabbagh
    Meinagh, Sima Osouli
    Kooshki, Alireza
    Afkhami-Ardakani, Omid
    Rasouli, Fatemeh
    Tos, Salem M.
    Tavanaei, Roozbeh
    Akhlaghpasand, Mohammadhosein
    Hashemi, Rana
    Hasanzade, Arman
    NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2025, 46 (02) : 689 - 696
  • [6] Fufang Xueshuantong for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Tan, Yu-meng
    Hu, Jun
    Wu, Qian
    Zhang, Yi
    Suo, Wen-dong
    Zhou, Yu-tong
    Guo, He
    Ni, Qing
    EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE, 2020, 2020
  • [7] Machine learning-based risk predictive models for diabetic kidney disease in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Yihan
    Jin, Nan
    Zhan, Qiuzhong
    Huang, Yue
    Sun, Aochuan
    Yin, Fen
    Li, Zhuangzhuang
    Hu, Jiayu
    Liu, Zhengtang
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2025, 16
  • [8] Machine learning for prediction of viral hepatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Moulaei, Khadijeh
    Sharifi, Hamid
    Bahaadinbeigy, Kambiz
    Haghdoost, Ali Akbar
    Nasiri, Naser
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2023, 179
  • [9] Machine learning algorithms’ accuracy in predicting kidney disease progression: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Nuo Lei
    Xianlong Zhang
    Mengting Wei
    Beini Lao
    Xueyi Xu
    Min Zhang
    Huifen Chen
    Yanmin Xu
    Bingqing Xia
    Dingjun Zhang
    Chendi Dong
    Lizhe Fu
    Fang Tang
    Yifan Wu
    BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 22
  • [10] Machine learning algorithms' accuracy in predicting kidney disease progression: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lei, Nuo
    Zhang, Xianlong
    Wei, Mengting
    Lao, Beini
    Xu, Xueyi
    Zhang, Min
    Chen, Huifen
    Xu, Yanmin
    Xia, Bingqing
    Zhang, Dingjun
    Dong, Chendi
    Fu, Lizhe
    Tang, Fang
    Wu, Yifan
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2022, 22 (01) : 205