Localized keyhole pore prediction during laser powder bed fusion via multimodal process monitoring and X-ray radiography

被引:9
作者
Gorgannejad, Sanam [1 ]
Martin, Aiden A. [1 ]
Nicolino, Jenny W. [1 ]
Strantza, Maria [1 ]
Guss, Gabriel M. [1 ]
Khairallah, Saad [1 ]
Forien, Jean-Baptiste [1 ]
Thampy, Vivek [2 ]
Liu, Sen [2 ]
Quan, Peiyu [2 ]
Tassone, Christopher J. [2 ]
Calta, Nicholas P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab, Livermore, CA 94550 USA
[2] SLAC Natl Accelerator Lab, Stanford Synchrotron Radiat Lightsource, Menlo Pk, CA 94025 USA
关键词
Laser powder bed fusion; In situ monitoring; X-ray radiography; Keyhole pore identification; Sensor fusion; ACOUSTIC-EMISSION; FAULT-DETECTION; CLASSIFICATION; HCTSA;
D O I
10.1016/j.addma.2023.103810
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Systematic fault detection and control during laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF) has been a long-standing objective for system manufacturers and researchers in the additive manufacturing (AM) industry. This manuscript investigates a data fusion approach for detection of keyhole porosity formation during laser irradiation of Ti-6Al-4V substrates by concurrent recording of thermally induced optical emission measured using both off-axis and coaxial photodiode sensors, and acoustic emission. Subsurface defect formation was monitored via high-speed synchrotron X-ray imaging at 20,000 frames per second, enabling temporal registration of keyhole pore formation events to the monitoring signals at a resolution of 50 mu s. We developed data fusion machine learning (ML) models for localized prediction of keyhole pore formation at various time scales ranging from 0.5 ms to 2 ms. The signal segments were featurized using two independent approaches: (1) power spectral density (PSD) and (2) highly comparative time series analysis (HCTSA) framework. The extracted features from different sensor mo-dalities were fused together to construct a multimodal feature space and sequential feature selection was used to determine the most informative features for training the ML models. The predictive performance was evaluated for three classifying algorithms: Support Vector Machine (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), and Gaussian Naive Bayes (GNB). As a result, pore formation events were predicted with up to 0.95 F1-score, 1.0 recall and 0.94 accuracy. The most heavily weighted features indicate that model performance is chiefly governed by the acoustic monitoring signal, with a secondary contribution from the optical emission sensors.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]   Opening the Black Box: Interpretable Machine Learning for Geneticists [J].
Azodi, Christina B. ;
Tang, Jiliang ;
Shiu, Shin-Han .
TRENDS IN GENETICS, 2020, 36 (06) :442-455
[2]   Keyhole-induced porosities in Laser-based Powder Bed Fusion (L-PBF) of Ti6Al4V: High-fidelity modelling and experimental validation [J].
Bayat, Mohamad ;
Thanki, Aditi ;
Mohanty, Sankhya ;
Witvrouw, Ann ;
Yang, Shoufeng ;
Thorborg, Jesper ;
Tiedje, Niels Skat ;
Hattel, Jesper Henri .
ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2019, 30
[3]   An instrument for in situ time-resolved X-ray imaging and diffraction of laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing processes [J].
Calta, Nicholas P. ;
Wang, Jenny ;
Kiss, Andrew M. ;
Martin, Aiden A. ;
Depond, Philip J. ;
Guss, Gabriel M. ;
Thampy, Vivek ;
Fong, Anthony Y. ;
Weker, Johanna Nelson ;
Stone, Kevin H. ;
Tassone, Christopher J. ;
Kramer, Matthew J. ;
Toney, Michael F. ;
Van Buuren, Anthony ;
Matthews, Manyalibo J. .
REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, 2018, 89 (05)
[4]   Observing molten pool surface oscillations during keyhole processing in laser powder bed fusion as a novel method to estimate the penetration depth [J].
Caprio, Leonardo ;
Demir, Ali Gokhan ;
Previtali, Barbara .
ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2020, 36
[5]   A Review of Data Fusion Techniques [J].
Castanedo, Federico .
SCIENTIFIC WORLD JOURNAL, 2013,
[6]   Melt pool sensing and size analysis in laser powder-bed metal additive manufacturing [J].
Cheng, Bo ;
Lydon, James ;
Cooper, Kenneth ;
Cole, Vernon ;
Northrop, Paul ;
Chou, Kevin .
JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING PROCESSES, 2018, 32 :744-753
[7]  
Chua ZY, 2017, INT J PR ENG MAN-GT, V4, P235
[8]   Laser-metal interaction dynamics during additive manufacturing resolved by detection of thermally-induced electron emission [J].
DePond, Philip J. ;
Fuller, John C. ;
Khairallah, Saad A. ;
Angus, Justin R. ;
Guss, Gabe ;
Matthews, Manyalibo J. ;
Martin, Aiden A. .
COMMUNICATIONS MATERIALS, 2020, 1 (01)
[9]   THE EFFECT OF SURFACE CONDITION ON ACOUSTIC-EMISSION DURING WELDING OF ALUMINUM WITH CO2-LASER RADIATION [J].
DULEY, WW ;
MAO, YL .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICS D-APPLIED PHYSICS, 1994, 27 (07) :1379-1383
[10]   Review of in-situ process monitoring and in-situ metrology for metal additive manufacturing [J].
Everton, Sarah K. ;
Hirsch, Matthias ;
Stravroulakis, Petros ;
Leach, Richard K. ;
Clare, Adam T. .
MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2016, 95 :431-445