Alternative Tissue Sampling for Improved Detection of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus

被引:1
作者
Hajeri, Subhas [1 ]
Olkowski, Sandra [2 ]
Kumagai, Lucita [3 ]
Mcroberts, Neil [2 ]
Yokomi, Raymond K. [4 ]
机构
[1] Alliance Pest Control Dist, Citrus Pest Detect Program, Tulare, CA 93274 USA
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Plant Pathol, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[3] Calif Dept Food & Agr, Sacramento, CA 95832 USA
[4] USDA, Agr Res Serv, SJVASC, Parlier, CA 93648 USA
来源
PLANTS-BASEL | 2023年 / 12卷 / 19期
关键词
HLB; citrus greening; qPCR; early detection; detection sensitivity; sample tissue; leaf petiole; fruit peduncle; feeder root; CITRUS; DISEASE; PCR;
D O I
10.3390/plants12193364
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Early detection and prompt response are key factors in the eradication of 'huanglongbing' (HLB) in California. Currently, qPCR testing of leaf tissue guides the removal of infected trees. However, because of the uneven distribution of 'Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus' (CLas) in an infected tree and asymptomatic infection, selecting the best leaves to sample, from a mature tree with more than 200,000 estimated leaves, is a major hurdle for timely detection. The goal of this study was to address this issue by testing alternative tissues that might improve the CLas detection rate. Using two years of field data, old and young leaves, peduncle bark of fruit, and feeder roots were evaluated for the presence of CLas. Quadrant-peduncle (Q-P) tissue sampling consistently resulted in better CLas detection than any other tissue type. Q-P samples had a 30% higher qPCR positivity rate than quadrant-leaf (Q-L) samples. No significant seasonal patterns were observed. Roots and single peduncles had similar detection rates; both were higher than single leaves or Q-L samples. If symptoms were used to guide sampling, 30% of infected trees would have been missed. Taken together, these results suggest that Q-P tissue sampling is the optimal choice for improved CLas detection under California growing conditions.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Albrecht C., 2020, J CITRUS PATHOL, V7, P1, DOI [10.5070/C471049054, DOI 10.5070/C471049054]
[2]  
Babcock B.A., 2022, J CITRUS PATHOL, V9, P36, DOI [10.5070/C49156433, DOI 10.5070/C49156433]
[3]  
BARJOSEPH M, 1979, PHYTOPATHOLOGY, V69, P190, DOI 10.1094/Phyto-69-190
[4]   The enemy within: phloem-limited pathogens [J].
Bendix, Claire ;
Lewis, Jennifer D. .
MOLECULAR PLANT PATHOLOGY, 2018, 19 (01) :238-254
[5]  
Bové JM, 2006, J PLANT PATHOL, V88, P7
[6]   Root samples provide early and improved detection of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus in Citrus [J].
Braswell, W. Evan ;
Park, Jong-Won ;
Stansly, Philip A. ;
Kostyk, Barry Craig ;
Louzada, Eliezer S. ;
da Graca, John V. ;
Kunta, Madhurababu .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
[7]   Phloem Loading and Unloading of Sucrose: What a Long, Strange Trip from Source to Sink [J].
Braun, David M. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT BIOLOGY, 2022, 73 :553-584
[8]  
California Department of Food and Agriculture, 2023, HLB Regulations and Quarantine Boundaries
[9]  
Futch S, 2009, PROC FL STATE HORTIC, V122, P152
[10]  
Gottwald T. R., 2007, Plant Health Progress, P1, DOI 10.1094/PHP-2007-0405-01-RS