How and why humans trust: A meta-analysis and elaborated model

被引:27
|
作者
Hancock, P. A. [1 ]
Kessler, Theresa T. [2 ]
Kaplan, Alexandra D. [2 ]
Stowers, Kimberly [3 ]
Brill, J. Christopher [4 ]
Billings, Deborah R. [5 ]
Schaefer, Kristin E. [6 ]
Szalma, James L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cent Florida, Inst Simulat & Training, Dept Psychol, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
[2] Univ Cent Florida, Dept Psychol, Orlando, FL USA
[3] Univ Alabama, Dept Management, Tuscaloosa, AL USA
[4] united States Air Force Res Lab, Dayton, NV USA
[5] Broky Consulting LLC, Hillsboro, OR USA
[6] DEVCOM Army Res Lab, Adelphi, MD USA
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2023年 / 14卷
关键词
trustors; trustees; meta-analysis; trust; dispositional trust; INTERPERSONAL-TRUST; AUTOMATION; PERFORMANCE; SCALE; COMMUNICATION; TRUSTWORTHINESS; COOPERATION; INEQUALITY; OUTCOMES; EMOTION;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1081086
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Trust exerts an impact on essentially all forms of social relationships. It affects individuals in deciding whether and how they will or will not interact with other people. Equally, trust also influences the stance of entire nations in their mutual dealings. In consequence, understanding the factors that influence the decision to trust, or not to trust, is crucial to the full spectrum of social dealings. Here, we report the most comprehensive extant meta-analysis of experimental findings relating to such human-to-human trust. Our analysis provides a quantitative evaluation of the factors that influence interpersonal trust, the initial propensity to trust, as well as an assessment of the general trusting of others. Over 2,000 relevant studies were initially identified for potential inclusion in the meta-analysis. Of these, (n = 338) passed all screening criteria and provided therefrom a total of (n = 2,185) effect sizes for analysis. The identified dependent variables were trustworthiness, propensity to trust, general trust, and the trust that supervisors and subordinates express in each other. Correlational results demonstrated that a large range of trustor, trustee, and shared, contextual factors impact each of trustworthiness, the propensity to trust, and trust within working relationships. The emphasis in the present work on contextual factors being one of several trust dimensions herein originated. Experimental results established that the reputation of the trustee and the shared closeness of trustor and trustee were the most predictive factors of trustworthiness outcome. From these collective findings, we propose an elaborated, overarching descriptive theory of trust in which special note is taken of the theory's application to the growing human need to trust in non-human entities. The latter include diverse forms of automation, robots, artificially intelligent entities, as well as specific implementations such as driverless vehicles to name but a few. Future directions as to the momentary dynamics of trust development, its sustenance and its dissipation are also evaluated.
引用
收藏
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] How effective are social engineering interventions? A meta-analysis
    Bullee, Jan-Willem
    Junger, Marianne
    INFORMATION AND COMPUTER SECURITY, 2020, 28 (05) : 801 - 830
  • [42] How to empower patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Werbrouck, Amber
    Swinnen, Eva
    Kerckhofs, Eric
    Buyl, Ronald
    Beckwee, David
    De Wit, Liesbet
    TRANSLATIONAL BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2018, 8 (05) : 660 - 674
  • [43] How Efficient Are Emotional Intelligence Trainings: A Meta-Analysis
    Hodzic, Sabina
    Scharfen, Jana
    Ripoll, Pilar
    Holling, Heinz
    Zenasni, Franck
    EMOTION REVIEW, 2018, 10 (02) : 138 - 148
  • [44] Towards a research agenda on how, when and why trust and distrust matter to coopetition
    Kostis, Angelos
    Nasholm, Malin Harryson
    JOURNAL OF TRUST RESEARCH, 2020, 10 (01) : 66 - 90
  • [45] Trust and corruption revisited: how and why trust and corruption shape each other
    Uslaner, Eric M.
    QUALITY & QUANTITY, 2013, 47 (06) : 3603 - 3608
  • [46] Trust and corruption revisited: how and why trust and corruption shape each other
    Eric M. Uslaner
    Quality & Quantity, 2013, 47 : 3603 - 3608
  • [47] Leading from the inside out: a meta-analysis of how, when, and why self-leadership affects individual outcomes
    Knotts, Kevin
    Houghton, Jeffery D.
    Pearce, Craig L.
    Chen, Huaizhong
    Stewart, Greg L.
    Manz, Charles C.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WORK AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 31 (02) : 273 - 291
  • [48] How to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic model studies
    Damen, Johanna A. A.
    Moons, Karel G. M.
    van Smeden, Maarten
    Hooft, Lotty
    CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2023, 29 (04) : 434 - 440
  • [49] The brand experience extended model: a meta-analysis
    Santini, Fernando de Oliveira
    Junior Ladeira, Wagner
    Sampaio, Claudio Hoffmann
    Pinto, Diego Costa
    JOURNAL OF BRAND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 25 (06) : 519 - 535
  • [50] A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of trust in the sharing economy
    Jiang, Jiang
    Li, Eldon Y.
    Tang, Li
    INTERNET RESEARCH, 2024, 34 (06) : 2257 - 2297