How and why humans trust: A meta-analysis and elaborated model

被引:27
|
作者
Hancock, P. A. [1 ]
Kessler, Theresa T. [2 ]
Kaplan, Alexandra D. [2 ]
Stowers, Kimberly [3 ]
Brill, J. Christopher [4 ]
Billings, Deborah R. [5 ]
Schaefer, Kristin E. [6 ]
Szalma, James L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cent Florida, Inst Simulat & Training, Dept Psychol, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
[2] Univ Cent Florida, Dept Psychol, Orlando, FL USA
[3] Univ Alabama, Dept Management, Tuscaloosa, AL USA
[4] united States Air Force Res Lab, Dayton, NV USA
[5] Broky Consulting LLC, Hillsboro, OR USA
[6] DEVCOM Army Res Lab, Adelphi, MD USA
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2023年 / 14卷
关键词
trustors; trustees; meta-analysis; trust; dispositional trust; INTERPERSONAL-TRUST; AUTOMATION; PERFORMANCE; SCALE; COMMUNICATION; TRUSTWORTHINESS; COOPERATION; INEQUALITY; OUTCOMES; EMOTION;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1081086
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Trust exerts an impact on essentially all forms of social relationships. It affects individuals in deciding whether and how they will or will not interact with other people. Equally, trust also influences the stance of entire nations in their mutual dealings. In consequence, understanding the factors that influence the decision to trust, or not to trust, is crucial to the full spectrum of social dealings. Here, we report the most comprehensive extant meta-analysis of experimental findings relating to such human-to-human trust. Our analysis provides a quantitative evaluation of the factors that influence interpersonal trust, the initial propensity to trust, as well as an assessment of the general trusting of others. Over 2,000 relevant studies were initially identified for potential inclusion in the meta-analysis. Of these, (n = 338) passed all screening criteria and provided therefrom a total of (n = 2,185) effect sizes for analysis. The identified dependent variables were trustworthiness, propensity to trust, general trust, and the trust that supervisors and subordinates express in each other. Correlational results demonstrated that a large range of trustor, trustee, and shared, contextual factors impact each of trustworthiness, the propensity to trust, and trust within working relationships. The emphasis in the present work on contextual factors being one of several trust dimensions herein originated. Experimental results established that the reputation of the trustee and the shared closeness of trustor and trustee were the most predictive factors of trustworthiness outcome. From these collective findings, we propose an elaborated, overarching descriptive theory of trust in which special note is taken of the theory's application to the growing human need to trust in non-human entities. The latter include diverse forms of automation, robots, artificially intelligent entities, as well as specific implementations such as driverless vehicles to name but a few. Future directions as to the momentary dynamics of trust development, its sustenance and its dissipation are also evaluated.
引用
收藏
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Converging Measures and an Emergent Model: A Meta-Analysis of Human-Machine Trust Questionnaires
    Razin, Yosef s.
    Feign, Karen m.
    ACM TRANSACTIONS ON HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION, 2024, 13 (04)
  • [22] A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of trust in mobile commerce
    Sarkar, Subhro
    Chauhan, Sumedha
    Khare, Arpita
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2020, 50 : 286 - 301
  • [23] A Meta-analysis on Children's Trust in Social Robots
    Stower, Rebecca
    Calvo-Barajas, Natalia
    Castellano, Ginevra
    Kappas, Arvid
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ROBOTICS, 2021, 13 (08) : 1979 - 2001
  • [24] A Meta-analysis on Children’s Trust in Social Robots
    Rebecca Stower
    Natalia Calvo-Barajas
    Ginevra Castellano
    Arvid Kappas
    International Journal of Social Robotics, 2021, 13 : 1979 - 2001
  • [25] Does Trust Matter More in Virtual Teams? A Meta-Analysis of Trust and Team Effectiveness Considering Virtuality and Documentation as Moderators
    Breuer, Christina
    Hueffmeier, Joachim
    Hertel, Guido
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 101 (08) : 1151 - 1177
  • [26] A qualitative meta-analysis of trust in supervisor-subordinate relationships
    Nienaber, Ann-Marie
    Romeike, Philipp Daniel
    Searle, Rosalind
    Schewe, Gerhard
    JOURNAL OF MANAGERIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 30 (05) : 507 - 534
  • [27] Consumer Trust: Meta-Analysis of 50 Years of Empirical Research
    Khamitov, Mansur
    Rajavi, Koushyar
    Huang, Der-Wei
    Hong, Yuly
    JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2024, 51 (01) : 7 - 18
  • [28] Does Political Trust Matter? A Meta-analysis on the Consequences of Trust
    Devine, Daniel
    POLITICAL BEHAVIOR, 2024, 46 (04) : 2241 - 2262
  • [29] A meta-analysis of the impact of trust on technology acceptance model: Investigation of moderating influence of subject and context type
    Wu, Kewen
    Zhao, Yuxiang
    Zhu, Qinghua
    Tan, Xiaojie
    Zheng, Hua
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2011, 31 (06) : 572 - 581
  • [30] How to read a meta-analysis?
    Moulis, G.
    Sommet, A.
    REVUE DE MEDECINE INTERNE, 2014, 35 (04): : 250 - 258