How and why humans trust: A meta-analysis and elaborated model

被引:24
|
作者
Hancock, P. A. [1 ]
Kessler, Theresa T. [2 ]
Kaplan, Alexandra D. [2 ]
Stowers, Kimberly [3 ]
Brill, J. Christopher [4 ]
Billings, Deborah R. [5 ]
Schaefer, Kristin E. [6 ]
Szalma, James L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cent Florida, Inst Simulat & Training, Dept Psychol, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
[2] Univ Cent Florida, Dept Psychol, Orlando, FL USA
[3] Univ Alabama, Dept Management, Tuscaloosa, AL USA
[4] united States Air Force Res Lab, Dayton, NV USA
[5] Broky Consulting LLC, Hillsboro, OR USA
[6] DEVCOM Army Res Lab, Adelphi, MD USA
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2023年 / 14卷
关键词
trustors; trustees; meta-analysis; trust; dispositional trust; INTERPERSONAL-TRUST; AUTOMATION; PERFORMANCE; SCALE; COMMUNICATION; TRUSTWORTHINESS; COOPERATION; INEQUALITY; OUTCOMES; EMOTION;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1081086
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Trust exerts an impact on essentially all forms of social relationships. It affects individuals in deciding whether and how they will or will not interact with other people. Equally, trust also influences the stance of entire nations in their mutual dealings. In consequence, understanding the factors that influence the decision to trust, or not to trust, is crucial to the full spectrum of social dealings. Here, we report the most comprehensive extant meta-analysis of experimental findings relating to such human-to-human trust. Our analysis provides a quantitative evaluation of the factors that influence interpersonal trust, the initial propensity to trust, as well as an assessment of the general trusting of others. Over 2,000 relevant studies were initially identified for potential inclusion in the meta-analysis. Of these, (n = 338) passed all screening criteria and provided therefrom a total of (n = 2,185) effect sizes for analysis. The identified dependent variables were trustworthiness, propensity to trust, general trust, and the trust that supervisors and subordinates express in each other. Correlational results demonstrated that a large range of trustor, trustee, and shared, contextual factors impact each of trustworthiness, the propensity to trust, and trust within working relationships. The emphasis in the present work on contextual factors being one of several trust dimensions herein originated. Experimental results established that the reputation of the trustee and the shared closeness of trustor and trustee were the most predictive factors of trustworthiness outcome. From these collective findings, we propose an elaborated, overarching descriptive theory of trust in which special note is taken of the theory's application to the growing human need to trust in non-human entities. The latter include diverse forms of automation, robots, artificially intelligent entities, as well as specific implementations such as driverless vehicles to name but a few. Future directions as to the momentary dynamics of trust development, its sustenance and its dissipation are also evaluated.
引用
收藏
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Trust, Conflict, and Cooperation: A Meta-Analysis
    Balliet, Daniel
    Van Lange, Paul A. M.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2013, 139 (05) : 1090 - 1112
  • [2] Trust games: A meta-analysis
    Johnson, Noel D.
    Mislin, Alexandra A.
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 32 (05) : 865 - 889
  • [3] Qualitative meta-analysis of propensity to trust measurement
    Patent, Volker
    Searle, Rosalind H.
    JOURNAL OF TRUST RESEARCH, 2019, 9 (02) : 136 - 163
  • [4] Sex differences in trust and trustworthiness: A meta-analysis of the trust game and the gift-exchange game
    van den Akker, Olmo R.
    van Assen, Marcel A. L. M.
    van Vugt, Mark
    Wicherts, Jelte M.
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 81
  • [5] Trust and performance in business teams: a meta-analysis
    Morrissette, Amy M.
    Kisamore, Jennifer L.
    TEAM PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, 2020, 26 (5-6) : 287 - 300
  • [6] How effective are warnings? A meta-analysis
    Hancock, P. A.
    Kaplan, A. D.
    MacArthur, K. R.
    Szalma, J. L.
    SAFETY SCIENCE, 2020, 130
  • [7] Trust, Punishment, and Cooperation Across 18 Societies: A Meta-Analysis
    Balliet, Daniel
    Van Lange, Paul A. M.
    PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2013, 8 (04) : 363 - 379
  • [8] A meta-analysis on the trust in agrifood supply chains
    Assis, Michel T. Q. M.
    Lucas, Maria Raquel
    Rainho, Maria Jose M.
    FOOD FRONTIERS, 2022, 3 (03): : 413 - 427
  • [9] Trust and Team Performance: A Meta-Analysis of Main Effects, Moderators, and Covariates
    De Jong, Bart A.
    Dirks, Kurt T.
    Gillespie, Nicole
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 101 (08) : 1134 - 1150
  • [10] Meta-analysis and traditional systematic literature reviews-What, why, when, where, and how?
    Paul, Justin
    Barari, Mojtaba
    PSYCHOLOGY & MARKETING, 2022, 39 (06) : 1099 - 1115