Model-free real-time optimization of process systems using safe Bayesian optimization

被引:8
作者
Krishnamoorthy, Dinesh [1 ,2 ]
Doyle, Francis J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Eindhoven Univ Technol, NL-5600 MB Eindhoven, Netherlands
[2] Harvard John A Paulson Sch Engn & Appl Sci, Allston, MA 02134 USA
关键词
Bayesian optimization; model-free optimization; real-time optimization; LOOP; STRATEGIES;
D O I
10.1002/aic.17993
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Conventional real-time optimization (RTO) requires detailed process models, which may be challenging or expensive to obtain. Model-free RTO methods are an attractive alternative to circumvent the challenge of developing accurate models. Most model-free RTO methods are based on estimating the steady-state cost gradient with respect to the decision variables and driving the estimated gradient to zero using integral action. However, accurate gradient estimation requires clear time scale separation from the plant dynamics, such that the dynamic plant can be assumed to be a static map. For processes with long settling times, this can lead to prohibitively slow convergence to the optimum. To avoid the need to estimate the cost gradients from the measurement, this article uses Bayesian optimization, which is a zeroth order black-box optimization framework. In particular, this article uses a safe Bayesian optimization based on interior point methods to ensure that the setpoints computed by the model-free steady-state RTO layer are guaranteed to be feasible with high probability (i.e., the safety-critical constraints will not be violated at steady-state). The proposed method can thus be seen as a model-free variant of the conventional two-step steady-state RTO framework (with steady-state detection), which is demonstrated on a benchmark Williams-Otto reactor example.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Steady-state real-time optimization using transient measurements on an experimental rig
    Matias, Jose
    Oliveira, Julio P. C.
    Le Roux, Galo A. C.
    Jaeschke, Johannes
    JOURNAL OF PROCESS CONTROL, 2022, 115 : 181 - 196
  • [42] Real-time process optimization based on grey-box neural models
    Cubillos, F. A.
    Acuna, G.
    Lima, E. L.
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2007, 24 (03) : 433 - 443
  • [43] Plantwide optimization via real-time optimization with persistent parameter adaptation
    Matias, Jose O. A.
    Roux, Galo A. C. Le
    JOURNAL OF PROCESS CONTROL, 2020, 92 (92) : 62 - 78
  • [44] Modifier Adaptation for Real-Time Optimization-Methods and Applications
    Marchetti, Alejandro G.
    Francois, Gregory
    Faulwasser, Timm
    Bonvin, Dominique
    PROCESSES, 2016, 4 (04)
  • [45] Process intensification of solar thermal power using hybridization, flexible heat integration, and real-time optimization
    Rashid, Khalid
    Safdarnejad, Seyed Mostafa
    Powell, Kody M.
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING AND PROCESSING-PROCESS INTENSIFICATION, 2019, 139 : 155 - 171
  • [46] Real-Time Batch Optimization for the Stochastic Container Relocation Problem
    Zhou, Sifang
    Zhang, Qingnian
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2024, 14 (06):
  • [47] Bayes_Opt-SWMM: : A Gaussian process-based Bayesian optimization tool for real-time flood modeling with SWMM
    Tanim, Ahad Hasan
    Smith-Lewis, Corinne
    Downey, Austin R. J.
    Imran, Jasim
    Goharian, Erfan
    ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2024, 179
  • [48] A study of model adaptation in iterative real-time optimization of processes with uncertainties
    Ahmad, Afaq
    Gao, Weihua
    Engell, Sebastian
    COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 122 : 218 - 227
  • [49] Steady-state target optimization designs for integrating real-time optimization and model predictive control
    Marchetti, A. G.
    Ferramosca, A.
    Gonzalez, A. H.
    JOURNAL OF PROCESS CONTROL, 2014, 24 (01) : 129 - 145
  • [50] Sensitivity-based Mnemonic Enhancement Optimization (S-MEO) for Real-time Optimization of Chemical Process
    Chen, Weifeng
    Zhu, Lingyu
    Chen, Xi
    Xu, Zuhua
    Shao, Zhijiang
    23 EUROPEAN SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER AIDED PROCESS ENGINEERING, 2013, 32 : 853 - 858