The Role of 12/14F Ureteral Access Sheath in Flexible Ureteroscopy for Moderate Nephrolithiasis

被引:0
作者
Ozimek, Tomasz [1 ,4 ]
Dellas, Pauline [1 ]
Becker, Benedikt [2 ]
Miernik, Arkadiusz [3 ]
Roesch, Marie Christine [1 ]
Merseburger, Axel Stuart [1 ]
Kramer, Mario Wolfgang [1 ]
Wiessmeyer, Judith Riccarda [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Klinikum Schleswig Holstein, Klin Urol, Campus Lubeck, Lubeck, Germany
[2] Asklepios Klin Barmbek, Abt Urol, Hamburg, Germany
[3] Univ Klinikum Freiburg, Dept Urol, Freiburg, Germany
[4] Univ Klinikum Schleswig Holstein, Klin Urol, Campus Lubeck,Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23562 Lubeck, Germany
关键词
ureteroscopy; flexible ureteroscopy; kidney stones; stone therapy; ureteral access sheath; PRESSURE; OUTCOMES; GUIDELINES; MANAGEMENT; STONES; IMPACT; TRACT;
D O I
10.1055/a-2024-0359
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: The aim was a retrospective analysis of 12/14F ureteral access sheath (UAS) usage on perioperative outcomes in patients with moderate nephrolithiasis (MN). MN was defined as a maximum of two unilateral kidney stones with a maximum stone diameter of 6-10 mm.Material and Methods: We conducted a monocentric retrospective univariate and multivariate analysis of flexible ureteroscopies (fURS) performed for MN between 01/2014 and 12/2018.Results: A total of 402 fURS were performed in patients with urolithiasis; 112 MN cases underwent further analysis. UAS was successfully applied in 33 MN cases [33/112 (29.46%)]. UAS was inserted regardless of the maximum kidney stone diameter and the presence of multiple kidney stones (p > 0.05). Univariate analysis revealed a prolonged median operation time (UAS: 94 min, non-UAS: 74 min, p = 0.04) and median fluoroscopy time (UAS: 75 s, non-UAS: 57.5 s, p = 0.04) in the UAS cohort. These differences were not confirmed on multivariate logistic regression.UAS was not associated with better stone-free rates in either the univariate or multivariate analysis (UAS: 26/33, non-UAS: 61/79, p = 1.0) nor with the occurrence of Clavien-Dindo & GE;2 complications (UAS: 3/33, non-UAS: 9/79, p = 0.98) or median length of hospital stay (UAS: 2 days, non-UAS: 2 days, p = 0.169).Conclusion: We identified no statistical benefits from the usage of 12/14F UAS for MN. As no relevant UAS-associated complications were documented, both strategies (with and without UAS) are feasible.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluating Predictive Factor of Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome and Postoperative Pain in Patients Without Ureteral Stent Placement After Ureteral Access Sheath Use in Flexible Ureteroscopy for Stone Management
    Inoue, Takaaki
    Hamamoto, Shuzo
    Okada, Shinsuke
    Yamamichi, Fukashi
    Fujita, Masaichiro
    Tominaga, Koki
    Fujisawa, Masato
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2022, 36 (02) : 169 - 175
  • [42] Understanding the Role of Ureteral Access Sheath in Preventing Post-Operative Infectious Complications in Stone Patients Treated with Ureteroscopy and Ho:YAG Laser Lithotripsy: Results from a Tertiary Care Referral Center
    Villa, Luca
    Dioni, Pietro
    Candela, Luigi
    Ventimiglia, Eugenio
    De Angelis, Mario
    Corsini, Christian
    Robesti, Daniele
    Fantin, Margherita
    D'Arma, Alessia
    Proietti, Silvia
    Giusti, Guido
    Goumas, Ioannis Kartalas
    Briganti, Alberto
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Salonia, Andrea
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (04)
  • [43] The effect of using ureteral access sheath for treatment of impacted ureteral stones at mid-upper part with flexible ureterorenoscopy: a randomized prospective study
    Ozkaya, Fatih
    Sertkaya, Zulfu
    Karabulut, Ibrahim
    Aksoy, Yilmaz
    MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA, 2019, 71 (04) : 413 - 420
  • [44] Multicenter outcome analysis of different sheath sizes for Flexible and Navigable Suction ureteral access sheath (FANS) ureteroscopy: an EAU Endourology collaboration with the global FANS study group
    Kwok, Jia-Lun
    Somani, Bhaskar
    Sarica, Kemal
    Yuen, Steffi Kar Kei
    Zawadzki, Marek
    Castellani, Daniele
    Persaud, Satyendra
    Chai, Chu Ann
    Kamal, Wissam
    Tefik, Tzevat
    Tursunkulov, Azimdjon N.
    Soebhali, Boyke
    El Hajj, Albert
    Ko, Raymond
    Fong, Khi Yung
    Dragos, Laurian
    Tanidir, Yiloren
    Angerri, Oriol
    Traxer, Olivier
    Gauhar, Vineet
    UROLITHIASIS, 2024, 52 (01)
  • [45] Re: Multicenter outcome analysis of different sheath sizes for Flexible and Navigable Suction ureteral access sheath (FANS) ureteroscopy: an EAU Endourology collaboration with the global FANS study group
    Sariduman, Nursah
    Kaba, Mustafa
    Gurocak, Ozdemir Serhat
    Tan, Mustafa Ozgur
    UROLITHIASIS, 2025, 53 (01)
  • [46] Prospective randomized comparison of 2 ureteral access sheaths during flexible retrograde ureteroscopy
    Monga, M
    Best, S
    Venkatesh, R
    Ames, C
    Lieber, D
    Vanlangendock, R
    Landman, J
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 172 (02) : 572 - 573
  • [47] Omnidirectional (Flexible) Ureteral Access Sheath: Safety, Efficacy, and Initial Experience Report
    Ding, Jie
    Su, Tingting
    Zhang, Xiangmin
    Qian, Subo
    Duan, Liujian
    Huang, Yunteng
    Chu, Jian
    Zhang, Lin
    Cao, Jianwei
    Cui, Xingang
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2023, 37 (11) : 1184 - 1190
  • [48] The use of a ureteral access sheath does not improve stone-free rate after ureteroscopy for upper urinary tract stones
    Gaetan Berquet
    Paul Prunel
    Grégory Verhoest
    Romain Mathieu
    Karim Bensalah
    World Journal of Urology, 2014, 32 : 229 - 232
  • [49] Outcomes and Long-Term Follow-Up with the Use of Ureteral Access Sheath for Pediatric Ureteroscopy and Stone Treatment: Results from a Tertiary Endourology Center
    Anbarasan, Ravindar
    Griffin, Stephen J.
    Somani, Bhaskar K.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2019, 33 (02) : 79 - 83
  • [50] Combined semirigid and flexible ureterorenoscopy via a large ureteral access sheath for kidney stones >2 cm: a bicentric prospective assessment
    Arkadiusz Miernik
    Martin Schoenthaler
    Konrad Wilhelm
    Ulrich Wetterauer
    Marcin Zyczkowski
    Andrzej Paradysz
    Piotr Bryniarski
    World Journal of Urology, 2014, 32 : 697 - 702