The Role of 12/14F Ureteral Access Sheath in Flexible Ureteroscopy for Moderate Nephrolithiasis

被引:0
作者
Ozimek, Tomasz [1 ,4 ]
Dellas, Pauline [1 ]
Becker, Benedikt [2 ]
Miernik, Arkadiusz [3 ]
Roesch, Marie Christine [1 ]
Merseburger, Axel Stuart [1 ]
Kramer, Mario Wolfgang [1 ]
Wiessmeyer, Judith Riccarda [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Klinikum Schleswig Holstein, Klin Urol, Campus Lubeck, Lubeck, Germany
[2] Asklepios Klin Barmbek, Abt Urol, Hamburg, Germany
[3] Univ Klinikum Freiburg, Dept Urol, Freiburg, Germany
[4] Univ Klinikum Schleswig Holstein, Klin Urol, Campus Lubeck,Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23562 Lubeck, Germany
关键词
ureteroscopy; flexible ureteroscopy; kidney stones; stone therapy; ureteral access sheath; PRESSURE; OUTCOMES; GUIDELINES; MANAGEMENT; STONES; IMPACT; TRACT;
D O I
10.1055/a-2024-0359
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: The aim was a retrospective analysis of 12/14F ureteral access sheath (UAS) usage on perioperative outcomes in patients with moderate nephrolithiasis (MN). MN was defined as a maximum of two unilateral kidney stones with a maximum stone diameter of 6-10 mm.Material and Methods: We conducted a monocentric retrospective univariate and multivariate analysis of flexible ureteroscopies (fURS) performed for MN between 01/2014 and 12/2018.Results: A total of 402 fURS were performed in patients with urolithiasis; 112 MN cases underwent further analysis. UAS was successfully applied in 33 MN cases [33/112 (29.46%)]. UAS was inserted regardless of the maximum kidney stone diameter and the presence of multiple kidney stones (p > 0.05). Univariate analysis revealed a prolonged median operation time (UAS: 94 min, non-UAS: 74 min, p = 0.04) and median fluoroscopy time (UAS: 75 s, non-UAS: 57.5 s, p = 0.04) in the UAS cohort. These differences were not confirmed on multivariate logistic regression.UAS was not associated with better stone-free rates in either the univariate or multivariate analysis (UAS: 26/33, non-UAS: 61/79, p = 1.0) nor with the occurrence of Clavien-Dindo & GE;2 complications (UAS: 3/33, non-UAS: 9/79, p = 0.98) or median length of hospital stay (UAS: 2 days, non-UAS: 2 days, p = 0.169).Conclusion: We identified no statistical benefits from the usage of 12/14F UAS for MN. As no relevant UAS-associated complications were documented, both strategies (with and without UAS) are feasible.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Ureteroscopy-assisted retrograde nephrostomy (UARN) without ureteral access sheath (UAS)
    Kawahara, Takashi
    Ito, Hiroki
    Terao, Hideyuki
    Uemura, Hiroji
    Yao, Masahiro
    Matsuzaki, Junichi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY CASE REPORTS, 2015, 10 : 56 - 58
  • [32] Flexible ureteroscopy with novel flexible ureteral access sheath versus mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of 2-3 cm renal stones
    Chen, Yujun
    Xi, Haibo
    Yu, Yue
    Cheng, Xiaofeng
    Yang, Heng
    Deng, Wen
    Liu, Wei
    Wang, Gongxian
    Zhou, Xiaochen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 31 (03) : 281 - 286
  • [33] Suctioning ureteral access sheath use in flexible ureteroscopy might decrease operation time and prevent infectious complications
    Tonyali, Senol
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 37 (02) : 393 - 394
  • [34] Comparison of flexible ureteroscopy with flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotripsy for the treatment of impacted upper ureteral stones: a retrospective study
    Tang, Haiyang
    Che, Yulong
    Wu, Zhanpeng
    Yuan, Fangchao
    Liu, Jiayu
    Li, Jie
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2025, 12
  • [35] Optimal placement of flexible ureteral access sheath in retrograde intrarenal surgery
    Yujun Chen
    Xiaofeng Cheng
    Heng Yang
    Wen Deng
    Luyao Chen
    Gongxian Wang
    Xiaochen Zhou
    Urolithiasis, 51
  • [36] Use of a modified ureteral access sheath in semi-rigid ureteroscopy to treat large upper ureteral stones is associated with high stone free rates
    AlSmadi, Jad Khaled
    Li, Xiaohang
    Zeng, Guohua
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 6 (03) : 217 - 221
  • [37] The Impact of Ureteral Access Sheath Use on the Development of Abnormal Postoperative Upper Tract Imaging after Ureteroscopy
    Cooper, John L.
    Francois, Nathaly
    Sourial, Michael W.
    Miyagi, Hiroko
    Rose, Justin R.
    Shields, John
    Sharma, Nitin
    Domino, Paula
    Otto, Brandon
    Box, Geoffrey N.
    Bird, Vincent G.
    Posid, Tasha
    Knudsen, Bodo E.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 204 (05) : 976 - 981
  • [38] The use of a ureteral access sheath does not improve stone-free rate after ureteroscopy for upper urinary tract stones
    Berquet, Gaetan
    Prunel, Paul
    Verhoest, Gregory
    Mathieu, Romain
    Bensalah, Karim
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 32 (01) : 229 - 232
  • [39] Bladder Recurrence Following Diagnostic Ureteroscopy in Patients Undergoing Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer: Is Ureteral Access Sheath Protective?
    Douglawi, Antoin
    Ghoreifi, Alireza
    Lee, Ryan
    Yip, Wesley
    Seyedian, Seyedeh-Sanam Ladi
    Ahmadi, Hamed
    Cai, Jie
    Miranda, Gus
    Yu, Wenhao
    Bhanvadia, Sumeet
    Schuckman, Anne
    Desai, Mihir
    Aron, Monish
    Sotelo, Rene
    Gill, Inderbir
    Daneshmand, Siamak
    Fuchs, Gerhard
    Djaladat, Hooman
    UROLOGY, 2022, 160 : 142 - 146
  • [40] Can mirabegron facilitate ureteral access sheath placement during flexible ureterorenoscopy?
    Keske, Murat
    Sonmez, Gokhan
    Karadag, Mert Ali
    ANNALS OF CLINICAL AND ANALYTICAL MEDICINE, 2020, 11 (06): : 553 - 556