The impact of neoliberal education on the alignment of student-supervisor expectations in Malaysia

被引:4
作者
Baydarova, Irina [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southampton Malaysia, Sch Business, Kota Iskandar, Malaysia
关键词
Doctoral supervision; student-supervisor expectations; neoliberalism; dialogue; equal power relationship; CHALLENGES;
D O I
10.1080/07294360.2022.2096575
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
While researchers explored arising expectations and the mismatches in perceptions of doctoral students and supervisors, less attention has been placed on the causes of such mismatches. This study contributes to a broader understanding of the current issues hindering the alignment of mutual expectations in postgraduate supervision within a dominating neoliberal agenda. Using an exploratory qualitative research design, interviews were held with 15 doctoral students and 12 supervisors in two research universities in Malaysia. Through an inductive thematic analysis, three sources of student-supervisor expectation misalignment were identified: power and hierarchy, student-supervisor dialogue and institutional support. The results suggest that within dominating neoliberal education, where focus has been placed on the achievement of tangible outcomes, Malaysian supervisors expect students to obey their decisions given their superior power. The monologic relationships between parties were observed because of limited time per student supervision. Lastly, given little attention towards development of supervisory relationships within a dominating neoliberal agenda, participants were unaware of the existing supervisory relationship's guidelines. The findings of this study highlight the importance of improving higher education research policy and practices. Suggestions on improving existing practices and where the attention should be focused are provided in the conclusion.
引用
收藏
页码:544 / 558
页数:15
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]  
ABDULLAH Asma., 2003, Understanding Multicultural Malaysia: Delights, Puzzles Irritations, XIII
[2]  
Adrian-Taylor S., 2007, J STUD INT EDUC, V11, P90, DOI DOI 10.1177/1028315306286313
[3]  
Angen MJ, 2000, QUAL HEALTH RES, V10, P378, DOI 10.1177/104973230001000308
[4]   Psychological health of doctoral candidates, study-related challenges and perceived performance [J].
Barry, K. M. ;
Woods, M. ;
Warnecke, E. ;
Stirling, C. ;
Martin, A. .
HIGHER EDUCATION RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 37 (03) :468-483
[5]  
Baydarova I., 2021, INT J DOCTORAL STUDI, V16, P001, DOI [10.28945/4682, DOI 10.28945/4682]
[6]  
Bertuletti S., 2016, Sensors Applications Symposium (SAS), P1, DOI [10.1007/978-981-10-0468-1_30-1, DOI 10.1109/SAS.2016.7479899]
[7]  
Boud D., 2006, HIGH EDUC RES DEV, V25, P293, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360600793093, DOI 10.1080/07294360600793093, 10.1080/07294360600793093]
[8]  
Braun V., 2006, Qualitative research in psychology, V3, P77, DOI [10.1191/1478088706qp063oa, doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa, DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA]
[9]  
Brown G., 1988, EFFECTIVE TEACHING H
[10]  
Bryman A., 2012, Social research methods, V4th ed.