A multi-criteria decision making approach to evaluating the performance of Indian railway zones

被引:4
作者
Jose, Esther [1 ]
Agarwal, Puneet [2 ]
Zhuang, Jun [1 ]
Swaminathan, Jose [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Buffalo, Buffalo, NY USA
[2] Calif Polytech State Univ San Luis Obispo, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407 USA
[3] Vellore Inst Technol, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
Multi-criteria decision making; Performance evaluation; Fuzzy axiomatic design; Railways; Ranking; FUZZY AXIOMATIC DESIGN; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; EVALUATION MODEL; TRANSPORTATION; EFFICIENCY; AHP; SELECTION; WEIGHTS;
D O I
10.1007/s10479-022-04866-2
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The Indian Railways is India's biggest employer and undeniably influences the country's transportation network, economy, and social and cultural systems. The network is split into zones for operational reasons. It is vital to evaluate these railway networks to identify their strengths and shortcomings and to improve their performance. Past works often use Data Envelopment Analysis to evaluate railway services. Our contribution lies in the inclusion of several aspects not previously considered, such as (i) both tangible and intangible criteria, (ii) the hierarchical nature of the problem, and (iii) additional useful criteria and data to analyze the performance of the zones, including physical assets, operating ratio, accidents, comfort, travel experience, flexibility, transparency, etc. We use the novel Hierarchical Fuzzy Axiomatic Design method to evaluate the performance of sixteen zones in the Indian Railways since it suits our problem well. We find that the Southern Railway zone performs best, while the Northeast Frontier zone is ranked last. We also identify the strengths and weaknesses of all railway zones.
引用
收藏
页码:1133 / 1168
页数:36
相关论文
共 86 条
[11]   An integrated approach to machine selection problem using fuzzy SMART-fuzzy weighted axiomatic design [J].
Cakir, Suleyman .
JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING, 2018, 29 (07) :1433-1445
[12]   Developing a group decision support system based on fuzzy information axiom [J].
Cebi, Selcuk ;
Kahraman, Cengiz .
KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2010, 23 (01) :3-16
[13]   Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP [J].
Chang, DY .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1996, 95 (03) :649-655
[14]   Preface: DEA and its applications in operations and data analytics [J].
Chen, Yao ;
Cook, Wade D. ;
Lim, Sungmook .
ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2019, 278 (1-2) :1-4
[15]   COMPARISON OF 2 METHODS FOR DETERMINING THE WEIGHTS OF BELONGING TO FUZZY-SETS [J].
CHU, ATW ;
KALABA, RE ;
SPINGARN, K .
JOURNAL OF OPTIMIZATION THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 1979, 27 (04) :531-538
[16]  
Demirel T, 2008, SPRINGER SER OPTIM A, V16, P53
[17]   Social and Economic Efficiency of Operation Dependent and Independent Traction in Rail Freight [J].
Dolinayova, Anna ;
Kanis, Juraj ;
Loch, Martin .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 9TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE (TRANSBALTICA 2015), 2016, 134 :187-195
[18]  
Gaied M, 2018, INT C CONTROL DECISI, P841, DOI 10.1109/CoDIT.2018.8394927
[19]   A performance benchmarking study of Indian Railway zones [J].
George, Sajeev Abraham ;
Rangaraj, Narayan .
BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2008, 15 (05) :599-617
[20]   Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to Introduce Weights to Social Life Cycle Assessment of Mobility Services [J].
Gompf, Katharina ;
Traverso, Marzia ;
Hetterich, Joerg .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (03) :1-10