A multi-criteria decision making approach to evaluating the performance of Indian railway zones

被引:4
作者
Jose, Esther [1 ]
Agarwal, Puneet [2 ]
Zhuang, Jun [1 ]
Swaminathan, Jose [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Buffalo, Buffalo, NY USA
[2] Calif Polytech State Univ San Luis Obispo, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407 USA
[3] Vellore Inst Technol, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
Multi-criteria decision making; Performance evaluation; Fuzzy axiomatic design; Railways; Ranking; FUZZY AXIOMATIC DESIGN; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; EVALUATION MODEL; TRANSPORTATION; EFFICIENCY; AHP; SELECTION; WEIGHTS;
D O I
10.1007/s10479-022-04866-2
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The Indian Railways is India's biggest employer and undeniably influences the country's transportation network, economy, and social and cultural systems. The network is split into zones for operational reasons. It is vital to evaluate these railway networks to identify their strengths and shortcomings and to improve their performance. Past works often use Data Envelopment Analysis to evaluate railway services. Our contribution lies in the inclusion of several aspects not previously considered, such as (i) both tangible and intangible criteria, (ii) the hierarchical nature of the problem, and (iii) additional useful criteria and data to analyze the performance of the zones, including physical assets, operating ratio, accidents, comfort, travel experience, flexibility, transparency, etc. We use the novel Hierarchical Fuzzy Axiomatic Design method to evaluate the performance of sixteen zones in the Indian Railways since it suits our problem well. We find that the Southern Railway zone performs best, while the Northeast Frontier zone is ranked last. We also identify the strengths and weaknesses of all railway zones.
引用
收藏
页码:1133 / 1168
页数:36
相关论文
共 86 条
[1]   Public Transportation and Customer Satisfaction: The Case of Indian Railways [J].
Agarwal, Reeti .
GLOBAL BUSINESS REVIEW, 2008, 9 (02) :257-272
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, The Times of India
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Times of India
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2018, TIMELINE 165 YEARS H
[5]  
Ayyappan V, 2020, EC TIMES
[6]  
Ayyappan V., 2020, TIMES INDIA
[7]   Performance evaluation of rail transportation systems by considering resilience engineering factors: Tehran railway electrification system [J].
Azadeh, A. ;
Salehi, V. ;
Kianpour, M. .
TRANSPORTATION LETTERS-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH, 2018, 10 (01) :12-25
[8]   Improved hierarchical fuzzy TOPSIS for road safety performance evaluation [J].
Bao, Qiong ;
Ruan, Da ;
Shen, Yongjun ;
Hermans, Elke ;
Janssens, Davy .
KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2012, 32 :84-90
[9]   Evaluation of E-Learning Web Sites Using Fuzzy Axiomatic Design Based Approach [J].
Bueyuekoezkan, Guelcin ;
Arsenyan, Jbid ;
Ertek, Guerdal .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS, 2010, 3 (01) :28-42
[10]   Education and crime: evidence from Italian regions [J].
Buonanno, Paolo ;
Leonida, Leone .
APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2006, 13 (11) :709-713