Why do firms down-list or exit from securities markets? Evidence from the German Stock Exchange

被引:5
作者
Bessler, Wolfgang [1 ]
Beyenbach, Johannes [2 ]
Rapp, Marc Steffen [3 ,4 ]
Vendrasco, Marco [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hamburg, Fac Business Adm, Empir Capital Market Res, Hamburg, Germany
[2] Philipps Univ Marburg, Ctr Corp Governance, HHL Leipzig Grad Sch Management, Management Accounting Res Grp, Leipzig, Germany
[3] Philipps Univ Marburg, Management Accounting Res Grp, Marburg, Germany
[4] Copenhagen Business Sch, Ctr Corp Governance, Frederiksberg, Denmark
[5] Univ Hamburg, Fac Business Adm, Hamburg, Germany
关键词
Securities market organization; Capital market regulation; Delisting; Down-listing; Going private; Corporate governance; FREE CASH FLOW; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; PRIVATE EQUITY; EUROPEAN FIRMS; IMPACT; CONSEQUENCES; REPURCHASES; ECONOMICS; COMPANIES; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1007/s11846-022-00554-4
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
In 2003, the German Stock Exchange instituted the Prime Standard as the highest regulated stock market segment in Germany. We analyze the firms' delisting decisions from this market segment between 2003 and 2015, with a focus on different delisting reasons and firm characteristics. We identify 518 firms that listed on the Prime Standard at least once during the sample period of which 243 firms left this market segment. Of these firms, 107 down-listed and transferred to lower market segments and 136 firms exited the public equity market for the following reasons: 61 firms merged, 53 were insolvent, and 22 firms went private. Using cross-sectional and firm-fixed effects logit regressions, we provide new evidence for firms' market segment and delisting decisions. Consistent with a cost-benefit analysis, we observe that inferior growth opportunities, low stock liquidity, smaller firm size, poor operating performance, higher audit fees, and more agency conflicts increase the probability that firms opt for a less regulated stock market segment or voluntarily go private. This raises the important issue of securities market reforms that best meet firms and investors preferences.
引用
收藏
页码:1175 / 1211
页数:37
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   Private Equity Acquisitions of Continental European Firms: the Impact of Ownership and Control on the Likelihood of Being Taken Private [J].
Achleitner, Ann-Kristin ;
Betzer, Andre ;
Goergen, Marc ;
Hinterramskogler, Bastian .
EUROPEAN FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2013, 19 (01) :72-107
[2]  
Andres C, 2007, FINANC MARK PORTFOLI, V21, P403, DOI 10.1007/s11408-007-0061-7
[3]   Lemons or Cherries? Growth Opportunities and Market Temptations in Going Public and Private [J].
Aslan, Hadiye ;
Kumar, Praveen .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS, 2011, 46 (02) :489-526
[4]   Why Do European Firms Go Public? [J].
Bancel, Franck ;
Mittoo, Usha R. .
EUROPEAN FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2009, 15 (04) :844-884
[5]  
Berninger M., 2018, SCHMALENBACHS BETRIE, V70, P351, DOI [10.1007/s41471-018-0058-0, DOI 10.1007/S41471-018-0058-0]
[6]   The creation and evolution of entrepreneurial public markets [J].
Bernstein, Shai ;
Dev, Abhishek ;
Lerner, Josh .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2020, 136 (02) :307-329
[7]  
Bessler W., 2022, IDEENGESCHICHTE BETR, V2, P271
[8]  
Bessler W, 2022, RELEVANCE DUAL CLASS
[9]  
Bessler W, 2021, STRATEGIEN NACHHALTI
[10]  
Bessler W., 2016, BANKR BANKWIRTSCH, V28, P362, DOI [10.15375/zbb-2016-0604, DOI 10.15375/ZBB-2016-0604]